Fiserv Forum · at Bucks · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIL | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 5-1 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIL 121–119 · win probability MIL 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 239.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MIL has more of the edges
CHI 2, MIL 5 · 2026-27 so far
CHI offense vs MIL defense
Offense 12th of 30 against a defense 28th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
CHI hits 28.1% and allows 39.3%; MIL hits 33.9% and allows 34.9%. Threes are 47.9% and 45.9% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
CHI has played the 14th-hardest schedule, MIL the 23rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CHI 29.2%, MIL 29.7%. Defensive: CHI 69.8%, MIL 74.2%
Free throws
Free throw rate: CHI 38.3, MIL 23.9. Allowed: CHI 33.5, MIL 29.7
Shooting
Effective FG%: CHI 48.2 and allows 56.0; MIL 52.0 and allows 55.4
Home court
MIL at home. This season: MIL 1-3 at home, CHI 1-3 away
MIL offense vs CHI defense
Offense 26th of 30 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CHI 16.2%, MIL 15.8%. Forced: CHI 14.7%, MIL 12.2%
Even
Recent form
Last 5: CHI 3-2 ATS, margin -10.4; MIL 2-3 ATS, margin -13.4
Context
Tempo
About 108 possessions: CHI plays 109.8 a game (1st fastest), MIL 106.2 (4th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CHI 100%, MIL 100%. Transfers in: CHI 0, MIL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMIL -2.9
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model239.9
Model edge—
Projected score
CHI 118.5 · MIL 121.4
Win probability
MIL 58%
1st half
Spread
MIL -1.5
Total
119.8
Projected score
CHI 59.1 · MIL 60.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% | |
| 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | 5-1 83% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 26 since 2021-22
CHI 8–18 MILMIL leads · 26 games since 2021-22 · CHI has won the last 2 meetings · CHI 12-14 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026-27 | CHI 132 @ MIL 125 | MIL -1.5 | CHI W |
| Mar 1, 2025-26 | MIL 97 @ CHI 120 | CHI +2.5 | CHI W |
| Feb 3, 2025-26 | CHI 115 @ MIL 131 | MIL +1.5 | MIL W |
| Dec 27, 2025-26 | MIL 112 @ CHI 103 | CHI -2.5 | MIL W |
| Nov 7, 2025-26 | CHI 110 @ MIL 126 | MIL -4.5 | MIL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bulls
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−32.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+8.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−5.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−20.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+1.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
+0.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−10.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+15.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−0.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−0.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+26.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
−0.5
over 2under 4avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bucks
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −7.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
−7.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
−8.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+1.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
+11.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
−23.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
−16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −7.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
WSH
L 116-128
+4.5
23
vs
CHI
L 125-132
+15.5
24
@
PHI
L 116-127
+8.5
26
vs
IND
W 110-102
−27.5
28
vs
HOU
L 100-132
+5.5
31
vs
CLE
L 111-136
+12.5
over 5under 1avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Bucks has the better starters
Position by position: Bulls 2, Bucks 3, even 0
BullsBetterBucks
G N. Powell20.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 71
←CHIBig
G T. Herro22 pts · 4.8 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 6
G J. Giddey8.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 29
←CHISmall
G R. Rollins11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 2
F C. Wilson21.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 6
→MILBig
F J. Jaquez16.2 pts · 7.2 reb · 3 ast
Score 51
F M. Buzelis14.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 4
→MILSmall
F K. Kuzma11.3 pts · 7.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 31
F P. Williams7 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 19
→MILBig
C M. Turner7.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 56
BullsBetterBucks
CHI offense12th of 30 · +1.2
←CHIBig
MIL defense28th of 30 · -6.0
CHI defense30th of 30 · -9.4
=Even
MIL offense26th of 30 · -2.9
Backcourt+5.1 · 2 players
←CHIBig
Backcourt-20.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt-24.0 · 3 players
→MILBig
Frontcourt+5.0 · 3 players
Bench-6.9 · 5 players
→MILBig
Bench-0.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCHI betterMIL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
N. Powell30 minJ. Giddey27 minT. Jones18 minB. Hield14 minJ. Hawkins14 minD. Swain12 min
Forwards
C. Wilson34 minM. Buzelis25 minP. Williams21 minL. Miller19 minZ. Collins18 minI. Okoro18 min
Out
J. SmithDay-To-DayT. AwakaDay-To-Day
Guards
T. Herro30 minR. Rollins26 minK. Porter33 minK. Jakucionis23 minG. Trent21 minA. Green19 min
Forwards
J. Jaquez28 minK. Kuzma27 minN. Ament16 minO. Dieng12 minB. Markovic5 min
Centers
M. Turner26 minJ. Sims20 minK. Ware20 min
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 113.5 #16 | Points per game | 113.0 #17 |
| 1.04 #26 | Points per possession | 1.07 #20 |
| 109.8 #1 | Pace (possessions) | 106.2 #4 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.2 #30 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #21 |
| 28.1 #30 | 3-point % | 33.9 #21 |
| 47.9 #4 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #8 |
| 38.3 #1 | Free throw rate | 23.9 #25 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #20 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #18 |
| 29.2 #9 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.7 #8 |
| 24.3 #25 | Assists per game | 26.0 #20 |
| Defense | ||
| 129.3 #30 | Points allowed | 126.2 #28 |
| 1.17 #27 | Points allowed per possession | 1.18 #28 |
| 56.0 #26 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.4 #24 |
| 39.3 #28 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.9 #14 |
| 14.7 #21 | Turnovers forced | 12.2 #30 |
| 69.8 #24 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.2 #10 |
| 8.7 #17 | Steals per game | 5.7 #30 |
| 5.0 #12 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #27 |
Bulls
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Celtics111–125
- Lvs Knicks127–133
- L@ Celtics99–134
- Lvs Wizards120–124
- W@ Bucks132–125
A week or more of rest.
Bucks
1-5 overall · 1-4 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Cavaliers111–136
- Lvs Rockets100–132
- Wvs Pacers110–102
- L@ 76ers116–127
- Lvs Bulls125–132
A week or more of rest.