Gainbridge Fieldhouse · at Pacers
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | IND | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-0 | Record | 2-5 |
| 6-0 | ATS | 3-4 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 3-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MEM 117–115 · win probability MEM 57%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 232.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
MEM 6, IND 1 · 2026-27 so far
Three-pointers
MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%; IND hits 34.1% and allows 35.9%. Threes are 42.1% and 43.1% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MEM 30.6%, IND 23.1%. Defensive: MEM 75.0%, IND 72.7%
MEM offense vs IND defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 25th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2; IND 53.9 and allows 53.9
IND offense vs MEM defense
Offense 24th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Recent form
Last 5: MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2; IND 2-3 ATS, margin -2.8
Home court
IND at home. This season: IND 0-3 at home, MEM 4-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MEM 25.3, IND 31.2. Allowed: MEM 31.4, IND 32.1
Context
Schedule so far
MEM has played the 30th-hardest schedule, IND the 29th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MEM 15.4%, IND 14.8%. Forced: MEM 15.7%, IND 14.9%
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: MEM plays 103.6 a game (13th fastest), IND 103.1 (15th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MEM 100%, IND 100%. Transfers in: MEM 0, IND 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMEM -2.5
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model232.1
Model edge—
Projected score
MEM 117.3 · IND 114.8
Win probability
MEM 57%
1st half
Spread
MEM -1.6
Total
116.1
Projected score
MEM 58.9 · IND 57.3
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% | |
| 2-5 29% | 3-4 43% | 3-4 43% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
MEM 8–2 INDMEM leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · MEM has won the last 2 meetings · MEM 9-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2025-26 | MEM 125 @ IND 106 | IND -1.5 | MEM W |
| Oct 25, 2025-26 | IND 103 @ MEM 128 | MEM -1.5 | MEM W |
| Feb 20, 2024-25 | MEM 113 @ IND 127 | IND -0.5 | IND W |
| Dec 1, 2024-25 | IND 121 @ MEM 136 | MEM -5.5 | MEM W |
| Jan 28, 2023-24 | MEM 110 @ IND 116 | IND -7.5 | MEM W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Pacers
7 games played
Straight up
2-5
29% wins
Against the spread
3-4
43% covers · avg −4.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-4
43% overs · avg −6.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 | @ | W 123-120 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 238.5 | O 243 |
| Oct 23 | vs | L 105-121 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 241.5 | U 226 |
| Oct 25 | @ | W 136-109 | -5.5 | W +21.5 | 231.5 | O 245 |
| Oct 26 | @ | L 102-110 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 239.5 | U 212 |
| Oct 28 | vs | L 109-114 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 234.5 | U 223 |
| Oct 30 | @ | L 125-145 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 236.5 | O 270 |
| Nov 1 | vs | L 90-98 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 230.5 | U 188 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
NO
W 123-120
+0.5
23
vs
DAL
L 105-121
−23.5
25
@
BKN
W 136-109
+21.5
26
@
MIL
L 102-110
−11.5
28
vs
PHI
L 109-114
+2.5
30
@
MIA
L 125-145
−11.5
1
vs
BKN
L 90-98
−11.5
covered 3didn’t cover 4avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
NO
W 123-120
+4.5
23
vs
DAL
L 105-121
−15.5
25
@
BKN
W 136-109
+13.5
26
@
MIL
L 102-110
−27.5
28
vs
PHI
L 109-114
−11.5
30
@
MIA
L 125-145
+33.5
1
vs
BKN
L 90-98
−42.5
over 3under 4avg −6.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Grizzlies 3, Pacers 1, even 1
GrizzliesBetterPacers
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
←MEMSmall
G A. Nembhard18.5 pts · 2.2 reb · 7.3 ast
Score 70
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
←MEMBig
G K. Oubre9.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 32
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
→INDSmall
G A. Nesmith12.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
=Even
F P. Siakam21.4 pts · 7.4 reb · 4 ast
Score 74
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
←MEMBig
C J. Huff6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 10
GrizzliesBetterPacers
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
←MEMBig
IND defense25th of 30 · -3.8
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
←MEMBig
IND offense24th of 30 · -2.3
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
←MEMBig
Backcourt+10.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
←MEMBig
Frontcourt+4.0 · 2 players
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
←MEMBig
Bench-26.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMEM betterIND betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Guards
A. Nembhard33 minK. Oubre23 minA. Nesmith23 minQ. Jackson20 minK. Brown12 minB. Smith6 min
Forwards
P. Siakam32 minJ. Walker22 minL. Nance16 minJ. Slawson13 min
Centers
J. Huff17 min
Out
I. ZubacOutO. ToppinDay-To-DayT. HaliburtonOutB. SheppardOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.2 #1 | Points per game | 112.9 #18 |
| 1.16 #4 | Points per possession | 1.10 #17 |
| 103.6 #13 | Pace (possessions) | 103.1 #15 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.9 #5 | Effective FG% | 53.9 #14 |
| 41.7 #1 | 3-point % | 34.1 #18 |
| 42.1 #19 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.1 #15 |
| 25.3 #22 | Free throw rate | 31.2 #12 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #16 | Turnover rate | 14.8 #10 |
| 30.6 #5 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.1 #27 |
| 27.0 #13 | Assists per game | 28.0 #7 |
| Defense | ||
| 106.0 #3 | Points allowed | 116.7 #23 |
| 1.03 #2 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #23 |
| 49.2 #3 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #19 |
| 30.0 #3 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.9 #20 |
| 15.7 #15 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #19 |
| 75.0 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.7 #16 |
| 6.3 #28 | Steals per game | 6.9 #27 |
| 5.2 #11 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #26 |
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.
Pacers
2-5 overall · 1-4 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Nets90–98
- L@ Heat125–145
- Lvs 76ers109–114
- L@ Bucks102–110
- W@ Nets136–109
A week or more of rest.