FedExForum · at Grizzlies
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 6-0 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 6-0 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MEM 125–115 · win probability MEM 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 239.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
CHI 1, MEM 7 · 2026-27 so far
Three-pointers
CHI hits 28.1% and allows 39.3%; MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%. Threes are 47.9% and 42.1% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: CHI 48.2 and allows 56.0; MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2
MEM offense vs CHI defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
CHI has played the 14th-hardest schedule, MEM the 30th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CHI 29.2%, MEM 30.6%. Defensive: CHI 69.8%, MEM 75.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: CHI 38.3, MEM 25.3. Allowed: CHI 33.5, MEM 31.4
Context
Tempo
About 107 possessions: CHI plays 109.8 a game (1st fastest), MEM 103.6 (13th). Faster games mean more points
Recent form
Last 5: CHI 3-2 ATS, margin -10.4; MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CHI 16.2%, MEM 15.4%. Forced: CHI 14.7%, MEM 15.7%
Home court
MEM at home. This season: MEM 2-0 at home, CHI 1-3 away
Even
CHI offense vs MEM defense
Offense 12th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CHI 100%, MEM 100%. Transfers in: CHI 0, MEM 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMEM -10.1
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model239.2
Model edge—
Projected score
CHI 114.5 · MEM 124.7
Win probability
MEM 77%
1st half
Spread
MEM -5.6
Total
119.4
Projected score
CHI 56.9 · MEM 62.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% | |
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
CHI 5–5 MEMSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · CHI 5-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2025-26 | CHI 124 @ MEM 125 | MEM +5.5 | MEM W |
| Mar 16, 2025-26 | MEM 107 @ CHI 132 | CHI -7.5 | CHI W |
| Nov 23, 2024-25 | MEM 142 @ CHI 131 | CHI +4.5 | MEM W |
| Oct 28, 2024-25 | CHI 126 @ MEM 123 | MEM -4.5 | CHI W |
| Feb 8, 2023-24 | CHI 118 @ MEM 110 | MEM +5.5 | CHI W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bulls
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−32.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+8.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−5.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−20.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+1.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
+0.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−10.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+15.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−0.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−0.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+26.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
−0.5
over 2under 4avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Bulls 0, Grizzlies 5, even 0
BullsBetterGrizzlies
G N. Powell20.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 71
→MEMSmall
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
G J. Giddey8.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 29
→MEMBig
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
F C. Wilson21.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 6
→MEMSmall
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
F M. Buzelis14.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 4
→MEMBig
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
F P. Williams7 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 19
→MEMBig
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
BullsBetterGrizzlies
CHI offense12th of 30 · +1.2
=Even
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
CHI defense30th of 30 · -9.4
→MEMBig
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
Backcourt+5.1 · 2 players
→MEMBig
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
Frontcourt-24.0 · 3 players
→MEMBig
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
Bench-6.9 · 5 players
←CHIBig
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCHI betterMEM betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
N. Powell30 minJ. Giddey27 minT. Jones18 minB. Hield14 minJ. Hawkins14 minD. Swain12 min
Forwards
C. Wilson34 minM. Buzelis25 minP. Williams21 minL. Miller19 minZ. Collins18 minI. Okoro18 min
Out
J. SmithDay-To-DayT. AwakaDay-To-Day
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 113.5 #16 | Points per game | 121.2 #1 |
| 1.04 #26 | Points per possession | 1.16 #4 |
| 109.8 #1 | Pace (possessions) | 103.6 #13 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.2 #30 | Effective FG% | 55.9 #5 |
| 28.1 #30 | 3-point % | 41.7 #1 |
| 47.9 #4 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.1 #19 |
| 38.3 #1 | Free throw rate | 25.3 #22 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #20 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #16 |
| 29.2 #9 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.6 #5 |
| 24.3 #25 | Assists per game | 27.0 #13 |
| Defense | ||
| 129.3 #30 | Points allowed | 106.0 #3 |
| 1.17 #27 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #2 |
| 56.0 #26 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.2 #3 |
| 39.3 #28 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.0 #3 |
| 14.7 #21 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #15 |
| 69.8 #24 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.0 #9 |
| 8.7 #17 | Steals per game | 6.3 #28 |
| 5.0 #12 | Blocks per game | 5.2 #11 |
Bulls
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Celtics111–125
- Lvs Knicks127–133
- L@ Celtics99–134
- Lvs Wizards120–124
- W@ Bucks132–125
A week or more of rest.
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.