TD Garden · at Celtics
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOS | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-0 | Record | 5-1 |
| 6-0 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 118–108 · win probability BOS 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 225.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
MEM 4, BOS 4 · 2026-27 so far
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MEM 30.6%, BOS 28.3%. Defensive: MEM 75.0%, BOS 68.4%
Three-pointers
MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%; BOS hits 35.5% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 42.1% and 45.9% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MEM 15.4%, BOS 14.9%. Forced: MEM 15.7%, BOS 17.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MEM 25.3, BOS 32.3. Allowed: MEM 31.4, BOS 31.7
Recent form
Last 5: MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2; BOS 3-2 ATS, margin +13.0
MEM offense vs BOS defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MEM has played the 30th-hardest schedule, BOS the 25th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2; BOS 55.0 and allows 51.3
Home court
BOS at home. This season: BOS 4-0 at home, MEM 4-0 away
Even
BOS offense vs MEM defense
Offense 15th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: MEM plays 103.6 a game (13th fastest), BOS 103.0 (16th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MEM 100%, BOS 100%. Transfers in: MEM 0, BOS 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -10.1
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model225.3
Model edge—
Projected score
MEM 107.6 · BOS 117.7
Win probability
BOS 77%
1st half
Spread
BOS -5.6
Total
112.9
Projected score
MEM 53.7 · BOS 59.3
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% | |
| 5-1 83% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
MEM 1–9 BOSBOS leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · BOS has won the last 3 meetings · MEM 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2025-26 | BOS 117 @ MEM 112 | MEM +15.5 | MEM W |
| Nov 12, 2025-26 | MEM 95 @ BOS 131 | BOS -8.5 | BOS W |
| Mar 31, 2024-25 | BOS 117 @ MEM 103 | MEM +2.5 | BOS W |
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | MEM 127 @ BOS 121 | BOS -7.5 | MEM W |
| Feb 4, 2023-24 | MEM 91 @ BOS 131 | BOS -19.5 | BOS W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Celtics
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
over 2under 4avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Grizzlies 2, Celtics 1, even 2
GrizzliesBetterCeltics
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
=Even
G D. White11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 87
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
=Even
G J. Walsh4.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
→BOSBig
F J. Tatum28.3 pts · 6 reb · 7.7 ast
Score 86
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
←MEMSmall
F P. George20.7 pts · 6 reb · 5 ast
Score 66
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
←MEMSmall
C N. Queta8.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
GrizzliesBetterCeltics
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
→BOSSmall
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
=Even
BOS offense15th of 30 · +0.8
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
=Even
Backcourt+15.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
←MEMBig
Frontcourt+21.5 · 3 players
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
→BOSBig
Bench+32.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMEM betterBOS betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh17 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman19 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez12 min
Forwards
J. Tatum36 minP. George31 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac4 min
Centers
N. Queta21 minL. Garza11 min
Out
M. RobinsonDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.2 #1 | Points per game | 118.7 #8 |
| 1.16 #4 | Points per possession | 1.15 #6 |
| 103.6 #13 | Pace (possessions) | 103.0 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.9 #5 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #10 |
| 41.7 #1 | 3-point % | 35.5 #10 |
| 42.1 #19 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #7 |
| 25.3 #22 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #16 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #11 |
| 30.6 #5 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #12 |
| 27.0 #13 | Assists per game | 28.0 #6 |
| Defense | ||
| 106.0 #3 | Points allowed | 109.2 #9 |
| 1.03 #2 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #9 |
| 49.2 #3 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #7 |
| 30.0 #3 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #12 |
| 15.7 #15 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #3 |
| 75.0 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #27 |
| 6.3 #28 | Steals per game | 9.2 #9 |
| 5.2 #11 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #25 |
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.
Celtics
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
- Wvs Knicks107–103
A week or more of rest.