TD Garden · at Celtics · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOS | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-2 | Record | 5-1 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 116–111 · win probability BOS 64%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 226.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOS has more of the edges
CLE 2, BOS 3 · 2026-27 so far
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CLE 14.2%, BOS 14.9%. Forced: CLE 14.1%, BOS 17.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: CLE 28.9, BOS 32.3. Allowed: CLE 23.2, BOS 31.7
Context
Tempo
About 105 possessions: CLE plays 106.2 a game (3rd fastest), BOS 103.0 (16th). Faster games mean more points
BOS offense vs CLE defense
Offense 15th of 30 against a defense 20th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
BOS at home. This season: BOS 4-0 at home, CLE 1-2 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CLE 26.7%, BOS 28.3%. Defensive: CLE 73.9%, BOS 68.4%
Even
CLE offense vs BOS defense
Offense 2nd of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Recent form
Last 5: CLE 2-3 ATS, margin +7.6; BOS 3-2 ATS, margin +13.0
Even
Three-pointers
CLE hits 37.0% and allows 33.7%; BOS hits 35.5% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 43.6% and 45.9% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
CLE has played the 24th-hardest schedule, BOS the 25th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: CLE 55.3 and allows 52.5; BOS 55.0 and allows 51.3
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CLE 100%, BOS 100%. Transfers in: CLE 0, BOS 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -4.8
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model226.5
Model edge—
Projected score
CLE 110.8 · BOS 115.7
Win probability
BOS 64%
1st half
Spread
BOS -2.6
Total
113.5
Projected score
CLE 55.5 · BOS 58
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% | |
| 5-1 83% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 22 since 2021-22
CLE 8–14 BOSBOS leads · 22 games since 2021-22 · BOS has won the last 3 meetings · CLE 13-9 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025-26 | BOS 109 @ CLE 98 | CLE -1.5 | BOS W |
| Nov 30, 2025-26 | BOS 117 @ CLE 115 | CLE -7.5 | BOS W |
| Oct 29, 2025-26 | CLE 105 @ BOS 125 | BOS +3.5 | BOS W |
| Feb 28, 2024-25 | CLE 123 @ BOS 116 | BOS -0.5 | CLE W |
| Feb 4, 2024-25 | BOS 112 @ CLE 105 | CLE -1.5 | BOS W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Cavaliers
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−5.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
−7.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
−1.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
+0.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−1.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−17.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
+17.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
+17.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
−8.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−12.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+12.5
over 3under 3avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Celtics
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
over 2under 4avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Celtics has the better starters
Position by position: Cavaliers 1, Celtics 2, even 2
CavaliersBetterCeltics
G J. Harden16.7 pts · 4.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 53
→BOSSmall
G D. White11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 87
G D. Mitchell22.7 pts · 5.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 86
=Even
G J. Walsh4.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
G S. Merrill8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 90
=Even
F J. Tatum28.3 pts · 6 reb · 7.7 ast
Score 86
C E. Mobley19.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 30
→BOSBig
F P. George20.7 pts · 6 reb · 5 ast
Score 66
C J. Allen15.3 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 100
←CLEBig
C N. Queta8.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
CavaliersBetterCeltics
CLE offense2nd of 30 · +4.0
=Even
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
CLE defense20th of 30 · -1.2
→BOSSmall
BOS offense15th of 30 · +0.8
Backcourt+25.3 · 3 players
←CLEBig
Backcourt+15.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+17.9 · 2 players
→BOSBig
Frontcourt+21.5 · 3 players
Bench+4.1 · 5 players
→BOSBig
Bench+32.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCLE betterBOS betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Harden34 minD. Mitchell33 minS. Merrill24 minM. Thomas21 minT. Proctor12 minC. Porter8 min
Forwards
M. Hezonja18 minT. Enaruna10 minR. Minix7 min
Centers
E. Mobley33 minJ. Allen28 minT. Bryant11 minE. UdehNew
Out
P. WatsonDay-To-DayJ. TysonOut
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh17 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman19 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez12 min
Forwards
J. Tatum36 minP. George31 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac4 min
Centers
N. Queta21 minL. Garza11 min
Out
M. RobinsonDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.0 #2 | Points per game | 118.7 #8 |
| 1.14 #7 | Points per possession | 1.15 #6 |
| 106.2 #3 | Pace (possessions) | 103.0 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.3 #7 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #10 |
| 37.0 #8 | 3-point % | 35.5 #10 |
| 43.6 #12 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #7 |
| 28.9 #13 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.2 #6 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #11 |
| 26.7 #20 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #12 |
| 28.7 #4 | Assists per game | 28.0 #6 |
| Defense | ||
| 116.0 #20 | Points allowed | 109.2 #9 |
| 1.09 #14 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #9 |
| 52.5 #12 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #7 |
| 33.7 #11 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #12 |
| 14.1 #25 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #3 |
| 73.9 #11 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #27 |
| 7.8 #22 | Steals per game | 9.2 #9 |
| 6.3 #6 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #25 |
Cavaliers
4-2 overall · 3-2 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Bucks136–111
- L@ Hawks111–114
- Wvs Wizards121–111
- Wvs Timberwolves127–125
- Wvs Nets125–121
A week or more of rest.
Celtics
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
- Wvs Knicks107–103
A week or more of rest.