TD Garden · at Celtics
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOS | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 5-1 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 115–105 · win probability BOS 76%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 220.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOS has more of the edges
LAC 0, BOS 5 · 2026-27 so far
LAC offense vs BOS defense
Offense 28th of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
LAC has played the 10th-hardest schedule, BOS the 25th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAC 52.9 and allows 56.9; BOS 55.0 and allows 51.3
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAC 20.4%, BOS 14.9%. Forced: LAC 17.0%, BOS 17.8%
Three-pointers
LAC hits 38.6% and allows 38.2%; BOS hits 35.5% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 42.3% and 45.9% of their shots
Home court
BOS at home. This season: BOS 4-0 at home, LAC 0-4 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAC 28.0, BOS 32.3. Allowed: LAC 24.7, BOS 31.7
Context
Tempo
About 102 possessions: LAC plays 101.7 a game (23rd fastest), BOS 103.0 (16th). Faster games mean more points
Even
BOS offense vs LAC defense
Offense 15th of 30 against a defense 12th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Recent form
Last 5: LAC 2-3 ATS, margin -13.8; BOS 3-2 ATS, margin +13.0
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAC 26.5%, BOS 28.3%. Defensive: LAC 70.9%, BOS 68.4%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAC 100%, BOS 100%. Transfers in: LAC 0, BOS 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -10.0
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model220.2
Model edge—
Projected score
LAC 105.1 · BOS 115.1
Win probability
BOS 76%
1st half
Spread
BOS -5.5
Total
110.5
Projected score
LAC 52.5 · BOS 58
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 5-1 83% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
LAC 4–6 BOSBOS leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · BOS has won the last 4 meetings · LAC 7-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2025-26 | BOS 146 @ LAC 115 | LAC -1.5 | BOS W |
| Nov 16, 2025-26 | LAC 118 @ BOS 121 | BOS -5.5 | LAC W |
| Jan 22, 2024-25 | BOS 117 @ LAC 113 | LAC +11.5 | LAC W |
| Nov 25, 2024-25 | LAC 94 @ BOS 126 | BOS -10.5 | BOS W |
| Jan 27, 2023-24 | LAC 115 @ BOS 96 | BOS -6.5 | LAC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clippers
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
+19.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+0.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
+9.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−17.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
−19.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
−10.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
−9.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+16.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
−14.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−34.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
+5.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
+15.5
over 3under 3avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Celtics
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
over 2under 4avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Celtics has the better starters
Position by position: Clippers 1, Celtics 4, even 0
ClippersBetterCeltics
G D. Garland20.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 27
→BOSBig
G D. White11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 87
G K. Dunn8.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 25
→BOSBig
G J. Walsh4.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
G K. Sanders8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
→BOSBig
F J. Tatum28.3 pts · 6 reb · 7.7 ast
Score 86
F R. Hachimura13.4 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 83
←LACSmall
F P. George20.7 pts · 6 reb · 5 ast
Score 66
F I. Jackson8 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 8
→BOSBig
C N. Queta8.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
ClippersBetterCeltics
LAC offense28th of 30 · -3.5
→BOSBig
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
LAC defense12th of 30 · +1.7
=Even
BOS offense15th of 30 · +0.8
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
→BOSBig
Backcourt+15.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
→BOSBig
Frontcourt+21.5 · 3 players
Bench+3.5 · 5 players
→BOSBig
Bench+32.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLAC betterBOS betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Garland33 minK. Dunn30 minK. Sanders23 minK. Wagler25 minJ. Pickett16 minG. Dick14 min
Forwards
R. Hachimura30 minI. Jackson22 minB. Miller8 minN. Martinelli5 min
Centers
B. Lopez22 min
Out
D. JonesDay-To-Day
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh17 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman19 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez12 min
Forwards
J. Tatum36 minP. George31 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac4 min
Centers
N. Queta21 minL. Garza11 min
Out
M. RobinsonDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 106.5 #28 | Points per game | 118.7 #8 |
| 1.04 #27 | Points per possession | 1.15 #6 |
| 101.7 #23 | Pace (possessions) | 103.0 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #18 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #10 |
| 38.6 #5 | 3-point % | 35.5 #10 |
| 42.3 #17 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #7 |
| 28.0 #17 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.4 #30 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #11 |
| 26.5 #21 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #12 |
| 24.3 #26 | Assists per game | 28.0 #6 |
| Defense | ||
| 113.8 #15 | Points allowed | 109.2 #9 |
| 1.13 #22 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #9 |
| 56.9 #28 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #7 |
| 38.2 #26 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #12 |
| 17.0 #8 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #3 |
| 70.9 #20 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #27 |
| 11.3 #3 | Steals per game | 9.2 #9 |
| 4.2 #22 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #25 |
Clippers
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Warriors112–124
- L@ Timberwolves101–127
- Lvs Lakers87–103
- L@ Thunder101–108
- L@ Lakers117–125
A week or more of rest.
Celtics
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
- Wvs Knicks107–103
A week or more of rest.