Kia Center · at Magic
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORL | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 2-4 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 3-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ORL 113–111 · win probability ORL 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 224.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
LAC 3, ORL 3 · 2026-27 so far
LAC offense vs ORL defense
Offense 28th of 30 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAC 52.9 and allows 56.9; ORL 53.4 and allows 53.0
Context
Schedule so far
LAC has played the 10th-hardest schedule, ORL the 1st. A record against a soft schedule means less
ORL offense vs LAC defense
Offense 21st of 30 against a defense 12th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAC 20.4%, ORL 17.0%. Forced: LAC 17.0%, ORL 13.6%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAC 26.5%, ORL 23.4%. Defensive: LAC 70.9%, ORL 68.9%
Home court
ORL at home. This season: ORL 0-3 at home, LAC 0-4 away
Even
Three-pointers
LAC hits 38.6% and allows 38.2%; ORL hits 35.4% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 42.3% and 46.5% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAC 28.0, ORL 31.7. Allowed: LAC 24.7, ORL 29.8
Context
Tempo
About 102 possessions: LAC plays 101.7 a game (23rd fastest), ORL 101.9 (22nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Recent form
Last 5: LAC 2-3 ATS, margin -13.8; ORL 2-3 ATS, margin -9.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAC 100%, ORL 100%. Transfers in: LAC 0, ORL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelORL -2.0
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model224.3
Model edge—
Projected score
LAC 111.2 · ORL 113.1
Win probability
ORL 56%
1st half
Spread
ORL -1.0
Total
112.5
Projected score
LAC 55.8 · ORL 56.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
LAC 6–4 ORLLAC leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · ORL has won the last 2 meetings · LAC 5-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2025-26 | ORL 111 @ LAC 109 | LAC -4.5 | ORL W |
| Nov 20, 2025-26 | LAC 101 @ ORL 129 | ORL -6.5 | ORL W |
| Mar 31, 2024-25 | LAC 96 @ ORL 87 | ORL +3.5 | LAC W |
| Nov 20, 2024-25 | ORL 93 @ LAC 104 | LAC +2.5 | LAC W |
| Mar 29, 2023-24 | LAC 100 @ ORL 97 | ORL +1.5 | LAC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clippers
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
+19.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+0.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
+9.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−17.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
−19.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
−10.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
−9.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+16.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
−14.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−34.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
+5.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
+15.5
over 3under 3avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Magic
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −5.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
−9.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−23.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
+15.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
−24.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+12.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−4.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −5.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
+23.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−26.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
−11.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
+3.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+8.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−16.5
over 3under 3avg −3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Magic has the better starters
Position by position: Clippers 2, Magic 3, even 0
ClippersBetterMagic
G D. Garland20.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 27
→ORLBig
G D. Bane17.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 62
G K. Dunn8.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 25
←LACSmall
G J. Richardson5.3 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
Score 3
G K. Sanders8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
→ORLBig
F F. Wagner19.7 pts · 6.7 reb · 7.8 ast
Score 90
F R. Hachimura13.4 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 83
←LACBig
F T. da Silva14.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 35
F I. Jackson8 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 8
→ORLSmall
C W. Carter13.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 28
ClippersBetterMagic
LAC offense28th of 30 · -3.5
→ORLBig
ORL defense15th of 30 · -0.1
LAC defense12th of 30 · +1.7
←LACSmall
ORL offense21st of 30 · -1.5
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
→ORLBig
Backcourt-2.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
→ORLBig
Frontcourt+14.7 · 3 players
Bench+3.5 · 5 players
←LACBig
Bench-1.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLAC betterORL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Garland33 minK. Dunn30 minK. Sanders23 minK. Wagler25 minJ. Pickett16 minG. Dick14 min
Forwards
R. Hachimura30 minI. Jackson22 minB. Miller8 minN. Martinelli5 min
Centers
B. Lopez22 min
Out
D. JonesDay-To-Day
Guards
D. Bane35 minJ. Richardson20 minJ. Carter18 minA. Morales6 min
Forwards
F. Wagner35 minT. da Silva29 minJ. Cain15 min
Centers
W. Carter32 minG. Bitadze9 minN. Vucevic9 minC. Castleton5 min
Out
J. SuggsOutP. BancheroOutA. BlackOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 106.5 #28 | Points per game | 107.7 #26 |
| 1.04 #27 | Points per possession | 1.07 #21 |
| 101.7 #23 | Pace (possessions) | 101.9 #22 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #18 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #15 |
| 38.6 #5 | 3-point % | 35.4 #11 |
| 42.3 #17 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.5 #6 |
| 28.0 #17 | Free throw rate | 31.7 #9 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.4 #30 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #24 |
| 26.5 #21 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.4 #26 |
| 24.3 #26 | Assists per game | 26.3 #16 |
| Defense | ||
| 113.8 #15 | Points allowed | 116.7 #22 |
| 1.13 #22 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #24 |
| 56.9 #28 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.0 #13 |
| 38.2 #26 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #13 |
| 17.0 #8 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #26 |
| 70.9 #20 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #26 |
| 11.3 #3 | Steals per game | 7.0 #26 |
| 4.2 #22 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #23 |
Clippers
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Warriors112–124
- L@ Timberwolves101–127
- Lvs Lakers87–103
- L@ Thunder101–108
- L@ Lakers117–125
A week or more of rest.
Magic
2-4 overall · 2-3 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Celtics97–108
- W@ Raptors121–114
- L@ Raptors99–129
- W@ Knicks111–102
- Lvs Timberwolves93–115
A week or more of rest.