Delta Center · at Jazz
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 5-1 | Record | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 1-5 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 119–108 · win probability BOS 80%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 226.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOS has more of the edges
BOS 7, UTAH 2 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
BOS has played the 25th-hardest schedule, UTAH the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BOS 14.9%, UTAH 17.0%. Forced: BOS 17.8%, UTAH 13.3%
UTAH offense vs BOS defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
BOS hits 35.5% and allows 33.8%; UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 45.9% and 41.7% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: BOS 55.0 and allows 51.3; UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9
BOS offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 15th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BOS 28.3%, UTAH 25.7%. Defensive: BOS 68.4%, UTAH 77.1%
Recent form
Last 5: BOS 3-2 ATS, margin +13.0; UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2
Home court
UTAH at home. This season: UTAH 1-4 at home, BOS 1-1 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: BOS 32.3, UTAH 31.6. Allowed: BOS 31.7, UTAH 33.8
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: BOS plays 103.0 a game (16th fastest), UTAH 104.0 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BOS 100%, UTAH 100%. Transfers in: BOS 0, UTAH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -11.6
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model226.9
Model edge—
Projected score
BOS 119.2 · UTAH 107.7
Win probability
BOS 80%
1st half
Spread
BOS -6.7
Total
113.7
Projected score
BOS 60.2 · UTAH 53.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-1 83% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% | |
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
BOS 7–3 UTAHBOS leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · BOS 6-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2025-26 | BOS 129 @ UTAH 119 | UTAH +8.5 | BOS W |
| Nov 3, 2025-26 | UTAH 105 @ BOS 103 | BOS -10.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 21, 2024-25 | BOS 121 @ UTAH 99 | UTAH +15.5 | BOS W |
| Mar 10, 2024-25 | UTAH 108 @ BOS 114 | BOS -15.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 12, 2023-24 | BOS 123 @ UTAH 107 | UTAH +6.5 | BOS W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Celtics
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
over 2under 4avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Celtics has the better starters
Position by position: Celtics 4, Jazz 1, even 0
CelticsBetterJazz
G D. White11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 87
←BOSBig
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
G J. Walsh4.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
←BOSBig
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
F J. Tatum28.3 pts · 6 reb · 7.7 ast
Score 86
←BOSBig
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
F P. George20.7 pts · 6 reb · 5 ast
Score 66
→UTAHSmall
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
C N. Queta8.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
←BOSSmall
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
CelticsBetterJazz
BOS offense15th of 30 · +0.8
←BOSBig
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
←BOSBig
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
Backcourt+15.6 · 2 players
←BOSBig
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt+21.5 · 3 players
←BOSBig
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
Bench+32.1 · 5 players
←BOSBig
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBOS betterUTAH betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh17 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman19 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez12 min
Forwards
J. Tatum36 minP. George31 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac4 min
Centers
N. Queta21 minL. Garza11 min
Out
M. RobinsonDay-To-Day
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 118.7 #8 | Points per game | 108.7 #24 |
| 1.15 #6 | Points per possession | 1.05 #25 |
| 103.0 #16 | Pace (possessions) | 104.0 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.0 #10 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #24 |
| 35.5 #10 | 3-point % | 32.6 #23 |
| 45.9 #7 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.7 #21 |
| 32.3 #7 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #10 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.9 #11 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #25 |
| 28.3 #12 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.7 #22 |
| 28.0 #6 | Assists per game | 26.2 #19 |
| Defense | ||
| 109.2 #9 | Points allowed | 118.8 #25 |
| 1.06 #9 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #25 |
| 51.3 #7 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #18 |
| 33.8 #12 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #25 |
| 17.8 #3 | Turnovers forced | 13.3 #28 |
| 68.4 #27 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.1 #4 |
| 9.2 #9 | Steals per game | 6.2 #29 |
| 4.0 #25 | Blocks per game | 6.5 #5 |
Celtics
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
- Wvs Knicks107–103
A week or more of rest.
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.