Delta Center · at Jazz
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UTAH 116–112 · win probability UTAH 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 228.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BKN has more of the edges
BKN 3, UTAH 1 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
BKN has played the 19th-hardest schedule, UTAH the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
BKN hits 35.1% and allows 35.8%; UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 48.0% and 41.7% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BKN 18.2%, UTAH 17.0%. Forced: BKN 15.9%, UTAH 13.3%
Recent form
Last 5: BKN 3-2 ATS, margin -8.0; UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2
Home court
UTAH at home. This season: UTAH 1-4 at home, BKN 1-2 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: BKN 50.7 and allows 55.3; UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BKN 32.9, UTAH 31.6. Allowed: BKN 33.5, UTAH 33.8
Even
BKN offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 29th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Even
UTAH offense vs BKN defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 22nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 105 possessions: BKN plays 105.1 a game (10th fastest), UTAH 104.0 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BKN 25.4%, UTAH 25.7%. Defensive: BKN 77.8%, UTAH 77.1%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BKN 100%, UTAH 100%. Transfers in: BKN 0, UTAH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelUTAH -4.5
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model228.4
Model edge—
Projected score
BKN 111.9 · UTAH 116.4
Win probability
UTAH 63%
1st half
Spread
UTAH -2.4
Total
114.4
Projected score
BKN 56 · UTAH 58.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
BKN 5–5 UTAHSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · BKN 5-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2025-26 | BKN 109 @ UTAH 99 | UTAH -3.5 | BKN W |
| Dec 4, 2025-26 | UTAH 123 @ BKN 110 | BKN +5.5 | UTAH W |
| Jan 12, 2024-25 | BKN 111 @ UTAH 112 | UTAH -3.5 | BKN W |
| Dec 21, 2024-25 | UTAH 105 @ BKN 94 | BKN -1.5 | UTAH W |
| Jan 29, 2023-24 | UTAH 114 @ BKN 147 | BKN -0.5 | BKN W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Nets
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
CHA
L 103-110
−5.5
24
@
CLE
L 121-125
+7.5
25
vs
IND
L 109-136
−21.5
27
@
BOS
L 124-125
+12.5
30
vs
DET
L 94-110
−7.5
1
@
IND
W 98-90
+11.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
CHA
L 103-110
−7.5
24
@
CLE
L 121-125
+17.5
25
vs
IND
L 109-136
+13.5
27
@
BOS
L 124-125
+25.5
30
vs
DET
L 94-110
−18.5
1
@
IND
W 98-90
−42.5
over 3under 3avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Nets 1, Jazz 1, even 3
NetsBetterJazz
G K. Ellis5 pts · 2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 21
=Even
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
G N. Traore10.5 pts · 1.8 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 1
=Even
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
F J. Randle20.8 pts · 7.2 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 39
←BKNSmall
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
F M. Porter21.2 pts · 7.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 91
=Even
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
C D. Sharpe8 pts · 7.7 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 6
→UTAHSmall
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
NetsBetterJazz
BKN offense29th of 30 · -5.5
=Even
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
BKN defense22nd of 30 · -1.7
=Even
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
Backcourt-12.0 · 2 players
←BKNBig
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt+7.8 · 3 players
→UTAHBig
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
Bench-17.9 · 5 players
→UTAHBig
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBKN betterUTAH betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Ellis24 minN. Traore21 minT. Mann24 minD. Powell21 minB. Saraf21 min
Forwards
J. Randle34 minM. Porter32 minC. Johnson22 minN. Clowney22 minD. Wolf21 minJ. Minott11 min
Centers
D. Sharpe23 minM. Wagner19 min
Out
M. BrownDay-To-DayE. DeminOut
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 108.2 #25 | Points per game | 108.7 #24 |
| 1.03 #29 | Points per possession | 1.05 #25 |
| 105.1 #10 | Pace (possessions) | 104.0 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.7 #26 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #24 |
| 35.1 #15 | 3-point % | 32.6 #23 |
| 48.0 #3 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.7 #21 |
| 32.9 #6 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #10 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #27 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #25 |
| 25.4 #23 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.7 #22 |
| 22.8 #28 | Assists per game | 26.2 #19 |
| Defense | ||
| 116.0 #21 | Points allowed | 118.8 #25 |
| 1.11 #18 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #25 |
| 55.3 #23 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #18 |
| 35.8 #19 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #25 |
| 15.9 #12 | Turnovers forced | 13.3 #28 |
| 77.8 #2 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.1 #4 |
| 9.0 #14 | Steals per game | 6.2 #29 |
| 4.7 #17 | Blocks per game | 6.5 #5 |
Nets
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Pacers98–90
- Lvs Pistons94–110
- L@ Celtics124–125
- Lvs Pacers109–136
- L@ Cavaliers121–125
A week or more of rest.
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.