Rocket Arena · at Cavaliers
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CLE | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 4-2 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 3-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CLE 118–111 · win probability CLE 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 228.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CLE has more of the edges
LAC 0, CLE 6 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
LAC has played the 10th-hardest schedule, CLE the 24th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAC 52.9 and allows 56.9; CLE 55.3 and allows 52.5
CLE offense vs LAC defense
Offense 2nd of 30 against a defense 12th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: LAC plays 101.7 a game (23rd fastest), CLE 106.2 (3rd). Faster games mean more points
LAC offense vs CLE defense
Offense 28th of 30 against a defense 20th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
LAC hits 38.6% and allows 38.2%; CLE hits 37.0% and allows 33.7%. Threes are 42.3% and 43.6% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAC 26.5%, CLE 26.7%. Defensive: LAC 70.9%, CLE 73.9%
Home court
CLE at home. This season: CLE 3-0 at home, LAC 0-4 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAC 20.4%, CLE 14.2%. Forced: LAC 17.0%, CLE 14.1%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAC 28.0, CLE 28.9. Allowed: LAC 24.7, CLE 23.2
Even
Recent form
Last 5: LAC 2-3 ATS, margin -13.8; CLE 2-3 ATS, margin +7.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAC 100%, CLE 100%. Transfers in: LAC 0, CLE 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelCLE -7.3
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model228.5
Model edge—
Projected score
LAC 110.6 · CLE 117.9
Win probability
CLE 70%
1st half
Spread
CLE -4.0
Total
114.4
Projected score
LAC 55.2 · CLE 59.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
LAC 3–7 CLECLE leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · CLE has won the last 3 meetings · LAC 3-7 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2025-26 | CLE 124 @ LAC 91 | LAC +2.5 | CLE W |
| Nov 23, 2025-26 | LAC 105 @ CLE 120 | CLE -7.5 | CLE W |
| Mar 30, 2024-25 | LAC 122 @ CLE 127 | CLE -6.5 | LAC W |
| Mar 18, 2024-25 | CLE 119 @ LAC 132 | LAC +2.5 | LAC W |
| Apr 7, 2023-24 | CLE 118 @ LAC 120 | LAC -4.5 | CLE W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clippers
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
+19.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+0.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
+9.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−17.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
−19.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
−10.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
−9.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+16.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
−14.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−34.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
+5.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
+15.5
over 3under 3avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Cavaliers
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−5.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
−7.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
−1.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
+0.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−1.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+16.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
22
@
PHI
L 106-114
−17.5
24
vs
BKN
W 125-121
+17.5
26
vs
MIN
W 127-125
+17.5
28
vs
WSH
W 121-111
−8.5
29
@
ATL
L 111-114
−12.5
31
@
MIL
W 136-111
+12.5
over 3under 3avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Cavaliers has the better starters
Position by position: Clippers 1, Cavaliers 4, even 0
ClippersBetterCavaliers
G D. Garland20.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 27
→CLESmall
G J. Harden16.7 pts · 4.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 53
G K. Dunn8.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 25
→CLEBig
G D. Mitchell22.7 pts · 5.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 86
G K. Sanders8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
→CLEBig
G S. Merrill8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 90
F R. Hachimura13.4 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 83
←LACBig
C E. Mobley19.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 30
F I. Jackson8 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 8
→CLEBig
C J. Allen15.3 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 100
ClippersBetterCavaliers
LAC offense28th of 30 · -3.5
→CLESmall
CLE defense20th of 30 · -1.2
LAC defense12th of 30 · +1.7
→CLESmall
CLE offense2nd of 30 · +4.0
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
→CLEBig
Backcourt+25.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
→CLEBig
Frontcourt+17.9 · 2 players
Bench+3.5 · 5 players
=Even
Bench+4.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLAC betterCLE betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Garland33 minK. Dunn30 minK. Sanders23 minK. Wagler25 minJ. Pickett16 minG. Dick14 min
Forwards
R. Hachimura30 minI. Jackson22 minB. Miller8 minN. Martinelli5 min
Centers
B. Lopez22 min
Out
D. JonesDay-To-Day
Guards
J. Harden34 minD. Mitchell33 minS. Merrill24 minM. Thomas21 minT. Proctor12 minC. Porter8 min
Forwards
M. Hezonja18 minT. Enaruna10 minR. Minix7 min
Centers
E. Mobley33 minJ. Allen28 minT. Bryant11 minE. UdehNew
Out
P. WatsonDay-To-DayJ. TysonOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 106.5 #28 | Points per game | 121.0 #2 |
| 1.04 #27 | Points per possession | 1.14 #7 |
| 101.7 #23 | Pace (possessions) | 106.2 #3 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #18 | Effective FG% | 55.3 #7 |
| 38.6 #5 | 3-point % | 37.0 #8 |
| 42.3 #17 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.6 #12 |
| 28.0 #17 | Free throw rate | 28.9 #13 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.4 #30 | Turnover rate | 14.2 #6 |
| 26.5 #21 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.7 #20 |
| 24.3 #26 | Assists per game | 28.7 #4 |
| Defense | ||
| 113.8 #15 | Points allowed | 116.0 #20 |
| 1.13 #22 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #14 |
| 56.9 #28 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #12 |
| 38.2 #26 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.7 #11 |
| 17.0 #8 | Turnovers forced | 14.1 #25 |
| 70.9 #20 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.9 #11 |
| 11.3 #3 | Steals per game | 7.8 #22 |
| 4.2 #22 | Blocks per game | 6.3 #6 |
Clippers
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Warriors112–124
- L@ Timberwolves101–127
- Lvs Lakers87–103
- L@ Thunder101–108
- L@ Lakers117–125
A week or more of rest.
Cavaliers
4-2 overall · 3-2 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Bucks136–111
- L@ Hawks111–114
- Wvs Wizards121–111
- Wvs Timberwolves127–125
- Wvs Nets125–121
A week or more of rest.