crypto.com Arena · at Lakers · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-0 | Record | 5-2 |
| 6-0 | ATS | 4-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 4-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LAL 121–114 · win probability LAL 68%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 234.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
MEM 5, LAL 3 · 2026-27 so far
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MEM 30.6%, LAL 26.8%. Defensive: MEM 75.0%, LAL 67.4%
Context
Schedule so far
MEM has played the 30th-hardest schedule, LAL the 16th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: MEM 25.3, LAL 37.2. Allowed: MEM 31.4, LAL 30.7
Three-pointers
MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%; LAL hits 38.9% and allows 36.7%. Threes are 42.1% and 45.7% of their shots
LAL offense vs MEM defense
Offense 4th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
MEM offense vs LAL defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 17th, on the model’s ratings
Recent form
Last 5: MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2; LAL 3-2 ATS, margin +1.4
Shooting
Effective FG%: MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2; LAL 60.1 and allows 53.7
Home court
LAL at home. This season: LAL 3-1 at home, MEM 4-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: MEM plays 103.6 a game (13th fastest), LAL 102.9 (17th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MEM 15.4%, LAL 18.3%. Forced: MEM 15.7%, LAL 17.8%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MEM 100%, LAL 100%. Transfers in: MEM 0, LAL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelLAL -6.5
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model234.7
Model edge—
Projected score
MEM 114.1 · LAL 120.6
Win probability
LAL 68%
1st half
Spread
LAL -3.5
Total
117.3
Projected score
MEM 56.9 · LAL 60.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% | |
| 5-2 71% | 4-3 57% | 4-3 57% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 24 since 2021-22
MEM 8–16 LALLAL leads · 24 games since 2021-22 · LAL has won the last 6 meetings · MEM 10-14 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2025-26 | MEM 114 @ LAL 120 | LAL -5.5 | LAL W |
| Jan 2, 2025-26 | MEM 121 @ LAL 128 | LAL -5.5 | LAL W |
| Oct 31, 2025-26 | LAL 117 @ MEM 112 | MEM +1.5 | LAL W |
| Mar 29, 2024-25 | LAL 134 @ MEM 127 | MEM -1.5 | LAL W |
| Dec 15, 2024-25 | MEM 110 @ LAL 116 | LAL +2.5 | LAL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Lakers
7 games played
Straight up
5-2
71% wins
Against the spread
4-3
57% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-3
57% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 | vs | W 127-105 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 233.5 | U 232 |
| Oct 23 | vs | W 125-117 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 225.5 | O 242 |
| Oct 25 | @ | W 132-123 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 237.5 | O 255 |
| Oct 27 | vs | L 129-136 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 234.5 | O 265 |
| Oct 28 | @ | W 103-87 | +1.5 | W +17.5 | 224.5 | U 190 |
| Oct 30 | @ | L 95-112 | -2.5 | L −19.5 | 234.5 | U 207 |
| Nov 1 | vs | W 131-125 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 224.5 | O 256 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
GS
W 127-105
+15.5
23
vs
LAC
W 125-117
−0.5
25
@
UTAH
W 132-123
+2.5
27
vs
POR
L 129-136
−8.5
28
@
LAC
W 103-87
+17.5
30
@
GS
L 95-112
−19.5
1
vs
TOR
W 131-125
+2.5
covered 4didn’t cover 3avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
GS
W 127-105
−1.5
23
vs
LAC
W 125-117
+16.5
25
@
UTAH
W 132-123
+17.5
27
vs
POR
L 129-136
+30.5
28
@
LAC
W 103-87
−34.5
30
@
GS
L 95-112
−27.5
1
vs
TOR
W 131-125
+31.5
over 4under 3avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Grizzlies 3, Lakers 1, even 1
GrizzliesBetterLakers
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
←MEMSmall
G A. Reaves23.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 82
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
=Even
G L. Doncic37.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 7.3 ast
Score 79
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
→LALSmall
G M. Thybulle9 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 50
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
←MEMSmall
F J. LaRavia5.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 70
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
←MEMBig
C W. Kessler14.3 pts · 9.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 42
GrizzliesBetterLakers
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
←MEMSmall
LAL defense17th of 30 · -0.2
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
→LALSmall
LAL offense4th of 30 · +3.2
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
→LALBig
Backcourt+24.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
←MEMBig
Frontcourt+7.4 · 2 players
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
→LALBig
Bench+6.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMEM betterLAL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Guards
A. Reaves36 minL. Doncic36 minM. Thybulle25 minQ. Grimes27 minC. Sexton18 minJ. Hardy16 min
Forwards
J. LaRavia23 minS. Mamukelashvili24 minJ. Vanderbilt15 minK. Looney8 minA. KalumaNewA. OkerekeNew
Centers
W. Kessler31 min
Out
Z. WilliamsOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.2 #1 | Points per game | 120.3 #5 |
| 1.16 #4 | Points per possession | 1.18 #2 |
| 103.6 #13 | Pace (possessions) | 102.9 #17 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.9 #5 | Effective FG% | 60.1 #1 |
| 41.7 #1 | 3-point % | 38.9 #4 |
| 42.1 #19 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.7 #9 |
| 25.3 #22 | Free throw rate | 37.2 #2 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #16 | Turnover rate | 18.3 #28 |
| 30.6 #5 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.8 #19 |
| 27.0 #13 | Assists per game | 23.4 #27 |
| Defense | ||
| 106.0 #3 | Points allowed | 115.0 #17 |
| 1.03 #2 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #19 |
| 49.2 #3 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.7 #17 |
| 30.0 #3 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.7 #22 |
| 15.7 #15 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #4 |
| 75.0 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.4 #29 |
| 6.3 #28 | Steals per game | 10.4 #4 |
| 5.2 #11 | Blocks per game | 6.7 #3 |
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.
Lakers
5-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Raptors131–125
- L@ Warriors95–112
- W@ Clippers103–87
- Lvs Trail Blazers129–136
- W@ Jazz132–123
A week or more of rest.