Kia Center · at Magic
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORL | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-0 | Record | 2-4 |
| 6-0 | ATS | 2-4 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 3-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ORL 116–114 · win probability ORL 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 229.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
MEM 7, ORL 2 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
MEM has played the 30th-hardest schedule, ORL the 1st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MEM 30.6%, ORL 23.4%. Defensive: MEM 75.0%, ORL 68.9%
Shooting
Effective FG%: MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2; ORL 53.4 and allows 53.0
Three-pointers
MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%; ORL hits 35.4% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 42.1% and 46.5% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MEM 15.4%, ORL 17.0%. Forced: MEM 15.7%, ORL 13.6%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MEM 25.3, ORL 31.7. Allowed: MEM 31.4, ORL 29.8
Recent form
Last 5: MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2; ORL 2-3 ATS, margin -9.4
ORL offense vs MEM defense
Offense 21st of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: MEM plays 103.6 a game (13th fastest), ORL 101.9 (22nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
ORL at home. This season: ORL 0-3 at home, MEM 4-0 away
MEM offense vs ORL defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MEM 100%, ORL 100%. Transfers in: MEM 0, ORL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelORL -2.2
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model229.5
Model edge—
Projected score
MEM 113.7 · ORL 115.9
Win probability
ORL 56%
1st half
Spread
ORL -1.1
Total
114.9
Projected score
MEM 56.9 · ORL 58
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% | |
| 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
MEM 8–2 ORLMEM leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · MEM 6-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2025-26 | ORL 109 @ MEM 126 | MEM +2.5 | MEM W |
| Jan 15, 2025-26 | MEM 111 @ ORL 118 | ORL -5.5 | ORL W |
| Feb 21, 2024-25 | MEM 105 @ ORL 104 | ORL +1.5 | ORL W |
| Oct 26, 2024-25 | ORL 111 @ MEM 124 | MEM -0.5 | MEM W |
| Mar 30, 2023-24 | MEM 88 @ ORL 118 | ORL -13.5 | ORL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Magic
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −5.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
−9.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−23.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
+15.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
−24.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+12.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−4.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −5.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
ATL
L 125-132
+23.5
23
vs
MIN
L 93-115
−26.5
25
@
NY
W 111-102
−11.5
28
@
TOR
L 99-129
+3.5
30
@
TOR
W 121-114
+8.5
1
vs
BOS
L 97-108
−16.5
over 3under 3avg −3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Grizzlies 4, Magic 1, even 0
GrizzliesBetterMagic
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
←MEMBig
G D. Bane17.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 62
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
←MEMBig
G J. Richardson5.3 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
Score 3
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
→ORLBig
F F. Wagner19.7 pts · 6.7 reb · 7.8 ast
Score 90
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
←MEMBig
F T. da Silva14.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 35
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
←MEMBig
C W. Carter13.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 28
GrizzliesBetterMagic
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
=Even
ORL defense15th of 30 · -0.1
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
←MEMSmall
ORL offense21st of 30 · -1.5
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
←MEMBig
Backcourt-2.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
←MEMBig
Frontcourt+14.7 · 3 players
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
→ORLBig
Bench-1.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMEM betterORL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Guards
D. Bane35 minJ. Richardson20 minJ. Carter18 minA. Morales6 min
Forwards
F. Wagner35 minT. da Silva29 minJ. Cain15 min
Centers
W. Carter32 minG. Bitadze9 minN. Vucevic9 minC. Castleton5 min
Out
J. SuggsOutP. BancheroOutA. BlackOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.2 #1 | Points per game | 107.7 #26 |
| 1.16 #4 | Points per possession | 1.07 #21 |
| 103.6 #13 | Pace (possessions) | 101.9 #22 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.9 #5 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #15 |
| 41.7 #1 | 3-point % | 35.4 #11 |
| 42.1 #19 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.5 #6 |
| 25.3 #22 | Free throw rate | 31.7 #9 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #16 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #24 |
| 30.6 #5 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.4 #26 |
| 27.0 #13 | Assists per game | 26.3 #16 |
| Defense | ||
| 106.0 #3 | Points allowed | 116.7 #22 |
| 1.03 #2 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #24 |
| 49.2 #3 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.0 #13 |
| 30.0 #3 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #13 |
| 15.7 #15 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #26 |
| 75.0 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #26 |
| 6.3 #28 | Steals per game | 7.0 #26 |
| 5.2 #11 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #23 |
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.
Magic
2-4 overall · 2-3 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Celtics97–108
- W@ Raptors121–114
- L@ Raptors99–129
- W@ Knicks111–102
- Lvs Timberwolves93–115
A week or more of rest.