Intuit Dome · at Clippers · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-0 | Record | 1-5 |
| 6-0 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 3-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LAC 115–112 · win probability LAC 57%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 227.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
MEM 5, LAC 2 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
MEM has played the 30th-hardest schedule, LAC the 10th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2; LAC 52.9 and allows 56.9
LAC offense vs MEM defense
Offense 28th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%; LAC hits 38.6% and allows 38.2%. Threes are 42.1% and 42.3% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MEM 30.6%, LAC 26.5%. Defensive: MEM 75.0%, LAC 70.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MEM 25.3, LAC 28.0. Allowed: MEM 31.4, LAC 24.7
Recent form
Last 5: MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2; LAC 2-3 ATS, margin -13.8
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: MEM plays 103.6 a game (13th fastest), LAC 101.7 (23rd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
LAC at home. This season: LAC 1-1 at home, MEM 4-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MEM 15.4%, LAC 20.4%. Forced: MEM 15.7%, LAC 17.0%
Even
MEM offense vs LAC defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 12th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MEM 100%, LAC 100%. Transfers in: MEM 0, LAC 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelLAC -2.4
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model227.3
Model edge—
Projected score
MEM 112.4 · LAC 114.9
Win probability
LAC 57%
1st half
Spread
LAC -1.2
Total
113.9
Projected score
MEM 56.3 · LAC 57.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% | |
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 18 since 2021-22
MEM 9–9 LACSeries tied · 18 games since 2021-22 · MEM 12-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025-26 | LAC 123 @ MEM 120 | MEM +7.5 | MEM W |
| Dec 15, 2025-26 | MEM 121 @ LAC 103 | LAC -5.5 | MEM W |
| Dec 5, 2025-26 | LAC 98 @ MEM 107 | MEM +2.5 | MEM W |
| Nov 28, 2025-26 | MEM 112 @ LAC 107 | LAC -6.5 | MEM W |
| Mar 21, 2024-25 | MEM 108 @ LAC 128 | LAC -6.5 | LAC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Clippers
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
+19.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+0.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
+9.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−17.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
−19.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
−10.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
−9.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+16.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
−14.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−34.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
+5.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
+15.5
over 3under 3avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Grizzlies 3, Clippers 0, even 2
GrizzliesBetterClippers
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
←MEMBig
G D. Garland20.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 27
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
←MEMBig
G K. Dunn8.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 25
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
=Even
G K. Sanders8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
=Even
F R. Hachimura13.4 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 83
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
←MEMBig
F I. Jackson8 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 8
GrizzliesBetterClippers
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
=Even
LAC defense12th of 30 · +1.7
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
←MEMBig
LAC offense28th of 30 · -3.5
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
←MEMBig
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
←MEMBig
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
→LACBig
Bench+3.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMEM betterLAC betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Guards
D. Garland33 minK. Dunn30 minK. Sanders23 minK. Wagler25 minJ. Pickett16 minG. Dick14 min
Forwards
R. Hachimura30 minI. Jackson22 minB. Miller8 minN. Martinelli5 min
Centers
B. Lopez22 min
Out
D. JonesDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.2 #1 | Points per game | 106.5 #28 |
| 1.16 #4 | Points per possession | 1.04 #27 |
| 103.6 #13 | Pace (possessions) | 101.7 #23 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.9 #5 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #18 |
| 41.7 #1 | 3-point % | 38.6 #5 |
| 42.1 #19 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.3 #17 |
| 25.3 #22 | Free throw rate | 28.0 #17 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #16 | Turnover rate | 20.4 #30 |
| 30.6 #5 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.5 #21 |
| 27.0 #13 | Assists per game | 24.3 #26 |
| Defense | ||
| 106.0 #3 | Points allowed | 113.8 #15 |
| 1.03 #2 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #22 |
| 49.2 #3 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.9 #28 |
| 30.0 #3 | Opponent 3-point % | 38.2 #26 |
| 15.7 #15 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #8 |
| 75.0 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.9 #20 |
| 6.3 #28 | Steals per game | 11.3 #3 |
| 5.2 #11 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #22 |
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.
Clippers
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Warriors112–124
- L@ Timberwolves101–127
- Lvs Lakers87–103
- L@ Thunder101–108
- L@ Lakers117–125
A week or more of rest.