United Center · at Bulls
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CHI | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-2 | Record | 1-5 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SA 126–110 · win probability SA 87%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 236.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SA has more of the edges
SA 6, CHI 1 · 2026-27 so far
SA offense vs CHI defense
Offense 5th of 30 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: SA 53.3 and allows 52.1; CHI 48.2 and allows 56.0
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SA 13.1%, CHI 16.2%. Forced: SA 15.7%, CHI 14.7%
Three-pointers
SA hits 34.9% and allows 37.3%; CHI hits 28.1% and allows 39.3%. Threes are 39.0% and 47.9% of their shots
CHI offense vs SA defense
Offense 12th of 30 against a defense 7th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SA 27.2%, CHI 29.2%. Defensive: SA 75.8%, CHI 69.8%
Context
Tempo
About 107 possessions: SA plays 104.3 a game (11th fastest), CHI 109.8 (1st). Faster games mean more points
Home court
CHI at home. This season: CHI 0-2 at home, SA 2-0 away
Even
Recent form
Last 5: SA 2-3 ATS, margin +11.0; CHI 3-2 ATS, margin -10.4
Context
Schedule so far
SA has played the 15th-hardest schedule, CHI the 14th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SA 24.5, CHI 38.3. Allowed: SA 21.7, CHI 33.5
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SA 100%, CHI 100%. Transfers in: SA 0, CHI 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelSA -15.8
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model236.2
Model edge—
Projected score
SA 126 · CHI 110.2
Win probability
SA 87%
1st half
Spread
SA -9.1
Total
118.0
Projected score
SA 63.5 · CHI 54.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | |
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
SA 4–7 CHICHI leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · SA has won the last 2 meetings · SA 3-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2025-26 | CHI 114 @ SA 129 | SA -17.5 | CHI W |
| Nov 10, 2025-26 | SA 121 @ CHI 117 | CHI +5.5 | CHI W |
| Jan 6, 2024-25 | SA 110 @ CHI 114 | CHI +2.5 | CHI W |
| Dec 5, 2024-25 | CHI 139 @ SA 124 | SA -1.5 | CHI W |
| Jan 13, 2023-24 | CHI 122 @ SA 116 | SA +6.5 | SA W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Spurs
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −3.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
vs
OKC
L 104-116
−10.5
23
vs
HOU
L 110-114
−8.5
24
@
DAL
W 122-106
+1.5
27
vs
SAC
W 130-103
+7.5
28
@
UTAH
W 117-111
−7.5
31
vs
MIN
W 121-111
−2.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
vs
OKC
L 104-116
−9.5
23
vs
HOU
L 110-114
−0.5
24
@
DAL
W 122-106
−1.5
27
vs
SAC
W 130-103
+0.5
28
@
UTAH
W 117-111
−4.5
31
vs
MIN
W 121-111
+1.5
over 2under 4avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bulls
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−32.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+8.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−5.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−20.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+1.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
+0.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−10.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+15.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−0.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−0.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+26.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
−0.5
over 2under 4avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Spurs has the better starters
Position by position: Spurs 5, Bulls 0, even 0
SpursBetterBulls
G D. Harper18.5 pts · 5.5 reb · 4.8 ast
Score 98
←SASmall
G N. Powell20.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 71
G D. Vassell12 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 53
←SASmall
G J. Giddey8.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 29
G D. Fox16.5 pts · 4.8 reb · 7 ast
Score 84
←SABig
F C. Wilson21.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 6
G S. Castle14.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 69
←SABig
F M. Buzelis14.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 4
F V. Wembanyama28 pts · 10.7 reb · 3 ast
Score 98
←SABig
F P. Williams7 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 19
SpursBetterBulls
SA offense5th of 30 · +2.9
←SABig
CHI defense30th of 30 · -9.4
SA defense7th of 30 · +3.7
←SASmall
CHI offense12th of 30 · +1.2
Backcourt+42.2 · 4 players
←SABig
Backcourt+5.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+17.3 · 1 player
←SABig
Frontcourt-24.0 · 3 players
Bench+19.9 · 5 players
←SABig
Bench-6.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSA betterCHI betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Harper34 minD. Vassell33 minD. Fox32 minS. Castle29 minJ. McLaughlin6 minJ. Gillespie2 min
Forwards
V. Wembanyama33 minJ. Champagnie28 minK. Johnson22 minC. Bryant9 minH. Barnes8 minD. Jones Garcia6 min
Centers
L. Kornet15 minT. Reed4 min
Guards
N. Powell30 minJ. Giddey27 minT. Jones18 minB. Hield14 minJ. Hawkins14 minD. Swain12 min
Forwards
C. Wilson34 minM. Buzelis25 minP. Williams21 minL. Miller19 minZ. Collins18 minI. Okoro18 min
Out
J. SmithDay-To-DayT. AwakaDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 117.3 #12 | Points per game | 113.5 #16 |
| 1.12 #10 | Points per possession | 1.04 #26 |
| 104.3 #11 | Pace (possessions) | 109.8 #1 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.3 #16 | Effective FG% | 48.2 #30 |
| 34.9 #17 | 3-point % | 28.1 #30 |
| 39.0 #24 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.9 #4 |
| 24.5 #24 | Free throw rate | 38.3 #1 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.1 #2 | Turnover rate | 16.2 #20 |
| 27.2 #16 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #9 |
| 27.5 #9 | Assists per game | 24.3 #25 |
| Defense | ||
| 110.2 #12 | Points allowed | 129.3 #30 |
| 1.06 #6 | Points allowed per possession | 1.17 #27 |
| 52.1 #11 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.0 #26 |
| 37.3 #23 | Opponent 3-point % | 39.3 #28 |
| 15.7 #14 | Turnovers forced | 14.7 #21 |
| 75.8 #7 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.8 #24 |
| 9.2 #10 | Steals per game | 8.7 #17 |
| 7.0 #1 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #12 |
Spurs
4-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Timberwolves121–111
- W@ Jazz117–111
- Wvs Kings130–103
- W@ Mavericks122–106
- Lvs Rockets110–114
A week or more of rest.
Bulls
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Celtics111–125
- Lvs Knicks127–133
- L@ Celtics99–134
- Lvs Wizards120–124
- W@ Bucks132–125
A week or more of rest.