Ford Center · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
UTM -7.5✓ EIU covered by 4.5
Closing total126.5Over by 2.5
| This season | UTM | |
|---|---|---|
| 10-19 | Record | 18-10 |
| 16-13 | ATS | 15-13 |
| 13-16 | O/U | 8-20 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: EIU 61–68 UTM · ✓ UTM (73%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIU | 22 | 41 | 63 |
| UTM | 27 | 39 | 66 |
1st half: EIU 22, UTM 27 (UTM by 5). The model had UTM by 4.0 and a total of 60.5 (actual 49).
Team stats
| EIU | UTM | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-53 43% | Field goals | 22-57 39% |
| 8-19 42% | 3-pointers | 8-29 28% |
| 9-13 69% | Free throws | 14-18 78% |
| 33 9 off | Rebounds | 39 14 off |
| 11 | Assists | 13 |
| 6 | Steals | 5 |
| 3 | Blocks | 3 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 19 | Fouls | 13 |
| 28 | Points in paint | 26 |
| 11 | Fast-break points | 10 |
Players
| EIU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kooper Jacobi F | 39 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 5-9 | 1-3 |
| Meechie White G | 36 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4-9 | 3-6 |
| Terry McMorris F | 32 | 15 | 12 | 2 | 5-12 | 0-0 |
| Zion Fruster G | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-1 |
| Nazareth Fisher F | 10 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Markus Blackwell G | 24 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-1 |
| Preston Turner G | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 6-10 | 4-8 |
| Andrew Austin F | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Prince Johnson F | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Andre Washington, Shane Sims, JT Elder, Malik Olafioye, Kyle Layton
| UTM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matas Deniusas F | 31 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-3 |
| Filip Radakovic G | 31 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 3-9 | 0-2 |
| Andrija Bukumirovic F | 30 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 5-10 | 1-5 |
| Filip Petkovski G | 27 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| Luca Colceag F | 21 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Afan Trnka G | 22 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-5 |
| Pedro Santos G | 16 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Vladimir Khryapa F | 15 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| AJ Hopkins F | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Damien King G | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: James Bass, Charlie King, Ama Sow, Enrique Moya, Will Hopkins, Ty Price, Lucas Williams, Dragos Lungu, Lamine Niang
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUTM -7.5
ModelUTM -6.8
Model edgeEIU +0.7
W EIU covered
Total
Market126.5
Model129.1
Model edgeOver 2.6
W Over
Projected score
EIU 61.1 · UTM 68
EIU 63 · UTM 66
Win probability
UTM 73%
1st half
Spread
UTM -4.0
UTM -5.0
Total
60.5
49 points
Projected score
EIU 28.3 · UTM 32.2
EIU 22 · UTM 27
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUTM -6.5
1 → UTM
CloseUTM -7.5
1 pt toward UTM
Total
Open122.5
▲ 4
Close126.5
Up 4 since the open
Moneyline
EIU +310 · UTM -395
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UTM -6.5 · closed UTM -7.5 · moved 1 toward UTMmodel UTM -7
model UTM -7
Opened 122.5 · closed 126.5 · moved 4 upmodel 129
model 129
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 2-8 20% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
EIU 4–6 UTMUTM leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · UTM has won the last 5 meetings · EIU 6-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2025-26 | UTM 76 @ EIU 68 | EIU +3.5 | UTM W |
| Jan 3, 2025-26 | EIU 61 @ UTM 65 | UTM -10.5 | EIU W |
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | UTM 72 @ EIU 68 | EIU +2.5 | UTM W |
| Jan 16, 2024-25 | EIU 63 @ UTM 68 | UTM -5.5 | EIU W |
| Feb 1, 2023-24 | UTM 76 @ EIU 59 | EIU -0.5 | UTM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
E Illinois
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-16
45% overs · avg −1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 63-66 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 65-57 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 58-78 | +23.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 53-99 | +35.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 60-81 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 62-109 | +40.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 74-82 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 59-68 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 53-78 | +43.5 | W +18.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 76-72 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 59-68 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 61-65 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 71-61 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 74-70 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 57-55 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 132.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 63-74 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 59-51 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 68-73 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 68-76 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 129.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 59-77 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 68-77 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 60-54 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 70-79 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 133.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-72 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 70-73 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-70 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 71-67 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 50-77 | +5.5 | L −21.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 77-71 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 128.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
VAL
L 63-66
+2.5
7
vs
NICH
W 65-57
+10.5
11
@
ND
L 58-78
+3.5
14
@
UK
L 53-99
−10.5
25
@
CARK
L 60-81
−15.5
28
@
PUR
L 62-109
−6.5
6
vs
LIN
L 74-82
+0.5
10
vs
EKU
L 59-68
−2.5
14
@
ISU
L 53-78
+18.5
18
vs
SIUE
W 76-72
+10.5
1
@
SEMO
L 59-68
+3.5
3
@
UTM
L 61-65
+6.5
8
vs
TNTC
W 71-61
+11.5
10
vs
TNST
W 74-70
+7.5
13
vs
WIU
W 57-55
−4.5
15
@
LR
L 63-74
−4.5
22
@
USI
W 59-51
+10.5
24
@
MORE
L 68-73
−0.5
29
vs
UTM
L 68-76
−4.5
31
vs
SEMO
L 59-77
−13.5
5
@
TNST
L 68-77
+0.5
7
@
TNTC
W 60-54
+10.5
10
@
WIU
L 70-79
−13.5
14
vs
LR
W 78-72
+8.5
19
vs
MORE
L 70-73
−1.5
21
vs
USI
L 68-70
−6.5
26
@
LIN
W 71-67
+11.5
28
@
SIUE
L 50-77
−21.5
4
vs
SIUE
W 77-71
+9.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
VAL
L 63-66
−15.5
7
vs
NICH
W 65-57
−13.5
11
@
ND
L 58-78
−7.5
14
@
UK
L 53-99
+4.5
25
@
CARK
L 60-81
+1.5
28
@
PUR
L 62-109
+29.5
6
vs
LIN
L 74-82
+10.5
10
vs
EKU
L 59-68
−22.5
14
@
ISU
L 53-78
−13.5
18
vs
SIUE
W 76-72
+13.5
1
@
SEMO
L 59-68
−19.5
3
@
UTM
L 61-65
−7.5
8
vs
TNTC
W 71-61
−8.5
10
vs
TNST
W 74-70
−0.5
13
vs
WIU
W 57-55
−20.5
15
@
LR
L 63-74
+3.5
22
@
USI
W 59-51
−25.5
24
@
MORE
L 68-73
+6.5
29
vs
UTM
L 68-76
+14.5
31
vs
SEMO
L 59-77
−2.5
5
@
TNST
L 68-77
−0.5
7
@
TNTC
W 60-54
−26.5
10
@
WIU
L 70-79
+15.5
14
vs
LR
W 78-72
+15.5
19
vs
MORE
L 70-73
+5.5
21
vs
USI
L 68-70
+2.5
26
@
LIN
W 71-67
−6.5
28
@
SIUE
L 50-77
−2.5
4
vs
SIUE
W 77-71
+19.5
over 13under 16avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
UT Martin
28 games played
Straight up
18-10
64% wins
Against the spread
15-13
54% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-20
29% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | W 86-81 | +16.5 | W +21.5 | 146.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 78-67 | +15.5 | W +26.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 73-87 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 69-68 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 60-70 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 73-56 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-64 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 54-83 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 71-78 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 86-62 | -2.5 | W +21.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 67-60 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 65-61 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 76-68 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 73-56 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 65-59 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 69-55 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 50-66 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 76-68 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 129.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 84-44 | -10.5 | W +29.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 55-52 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 76-54 | -10.5 | W +11.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 55-61 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 74-75 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 81-76 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 129.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 53-56 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 65-67 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 64-49 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 134.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 42-67 | -2.5 | L −27.5 | 143.5 | U 109 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
UNLV
W 86-81
+21.5
12
@
BRAD
W 78-67
+26.5
18
@
FSU
L 73-87
+5.5
22
vs
PV
W 69-68
−9.5
23
vs
USM
L 60-70
−11.5
2
vs
CHSO
W 73-56
+13.5
7
vs
ALST
W 74-64
+3.5
10
@
SIU
L 54-83
−20.5
18
@
TNST
L 71-78
−4.5
20
@
TNTC
W 86-62
+21.5
1
vs
WIU
W 67-60
−6.5
3
vs
EIU
W 65-61
−6.5
8
@
MORE
W 76-68
+5.5
10
@
USI
W 73-56
+11.5
15
vs
SIUE
W 65-59
−1.5
17
vs
LIN
W 69-55
+11.5
20
@
SEMO
L 50-66
−13.5
29
@
EIU
W 76-68
+4.5
31
@
WIU
W 84-44
+29.5
3
vs
LR
W 55-52
−3.5
5
vs
USI
W 76-54
+11.5
7
vs
MORE
L 55-61
−14.5
12
@
LIN
L 74-75
+0.5
14
@
SIUE
W 81-76
+3.5
17
vs
SEMO
L 53-56
−5.5
19
@
LR
L 65-67
−4.5
26
vs
TNTC
W 64-49
+7.5
28
vs
TNST
L 42-67
−27.5
covered 15didn’t cover 13avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
UNLV
W 86-81
+20.5
12
@
BRAD
W 78-67
+0.5
18
@
FSU
L 73-87
−5.5
22
vs
PV
W 69-68
−18.5
23
vs
USM
L 60-70
−16.5
2
vs
CHSO
W 73-56
−18.5
7
vs
ALST
W 74-64
−6.5
10
@
SIU
L 54-83
−9.5
18
@
TNST
L 71-78
+7.5
20
@
TNTC
W 86-62
+2.5
1
vs
WIU
W 67-60
−13.5
3
vs
EIU
W 65-61
−7.5
8
@
MORE
W 76-68
+8.5
10
@
USI
W 73-56
−8.5
15
vs
SIUE
W 65-59
−7.5
17
vs
LIN
W 69-55
−23.5
20
@
SEMO
L 50-66
−24.5
29
@
EIU
W 76-68
+14.5
31
@
WIU
W 84-44
−9.5
3
vs
LR
W 55-52
−32.5
5
vs
USI
W 76-54
−2.5
7
vs
MORE
L 55-61
−20.5
12
@
LIN
L 74-75
+3.5
14
@
SIUE
W 81-76
+27.5
17
vs
SEMO
L 53-56
−29.5
19
@
LR
L 65-67
−4.5
26
vs
TNTC
W 64-49
−21.5
28
vs
TNST
L 42-67
−34.5
over 8under 20avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
E Illinois
10-19 overall · 9-12 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs SIUE77–71
- L@ SIUE50–77
- W@ Lindenwood Lions71–67
- Lvs Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles68–70
- Lvs Morehead St70–73
1 day since their last game.
UT Martin
18-10 overall · 13-7 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee St42–67
- Wvs Tennessee Tech64–49
- L@ Little Rock65–67
- Lvs SE Missouri53–56
- W@ SIUE81–76
5 days since their last game.