Lee's Family Forum · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
HAW -5.5✓ HAW covered by 9.5
Closing total157.5Under by 16.5
| This season | HAW | |
|---|---|---|
| 16-15 | Record | 20-8 |
| 19-11 | ATS | 11-15 |
| 13-17 | O/U | 13-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CSUF 76–82 HAW · ✓ HAW (71%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSUF | 21 | 42 | 63 |
| HAW | 29 | 49 | 78 |
1st half: CSUF 21, HAW 29 (HAW by 8). The model had HAW by 3.6 and a total of 73.9 (actual 50).
Team stats
| CSUF | HAW | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-64 36% | Field goals | 25-61 41% |
| 10-32 31% | 3-pointers | 3-22 14% |
| 7-10 70% | Free throws | 25-26 96% |
| 26 6 off | Rebounds | 53 16 off |
| 14 | Assists | 18 |
| 8 | Steals | 7 |
| 4 | Blocks | 5 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 20 | Fouls | 15 |
| 22 | Points in paint | 42 |
| 15 | Fast-break points | 10 |
Players
| CSUF | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jefferson De La Cruz Monegro G | 33 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3-10 | 0-4 |
| Christian Williams G | 32 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 7-15 | 6-10 |
| Joshua Ward G | 29 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 2-11 | 0-5 |
| Landon Seaman F | 20 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-3 |
| Bryce Cofield G | 19 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 3-4 | 1-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Bailey Nunn G | 25 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3-4 | 3-4 |
| KJ Garris Jr. G | 18 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-4 |
| Kendrick De Luna F | 16 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Jaden Henderson G | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Matthew Quinlan, Ben Winker, Davis White, Yesan Warren, Kidus Tilahun, Karan Kolappa, Cam Smith, Nicholas Khatchikian
| HAW | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Erickson G | 35 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 2-5 | 0-3 |
| Isaac Finlinson F | 34 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-2 |
| Harry Rouhliadeff F | 34 | 16 | 10 | 0 | 6-11 | 0-4 |
| Dre Bullock G | 32 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 4-11 | 1-3 |
| Isaac Johnson C | 22 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 6-15 | 1-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Isaiah Kerr G | 19 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-2 |
| Gytis Nemeiksa F | 14 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| Yacine Toumi F | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Aaron Hunkin-Claytor, Hunter Carter, AJ Economou, Tanner Cuff, Jalen Myers
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketHAW -5.5
ModelHAW -6.2
Model edgeHAW +0.7
W HAW covered
Total
Market157.5
Model158.1
Model edgeOver 0.6
L Under
Projected score
CSUF 76 · HAW 82.2
CSUF 63 · HAW 78
Win probability
HAW 71%
1st half
Spread
HAW -3.6
HAW -8.0
Total
73.9
50 points
Projected score
CSUF 35.2 · HAW 38.7
CSUF 21 · HAW 29
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenHAW -3.5
2 → HAW
CloseHAW -5.5
2 pts toward HAW
Total
Open158.5
▼ 1
Close157.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
CSUF +190 · HAW -230
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened HAW -3.5 · closed HAW -5.5 · moved 2 toward HAWmodel HAW -6
model HAW -6
Opened 158.5 · closed 157.5 · moved 1 downmodel 158
model 158
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
CSUF 5–6 HAWHAW leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · HAW has won the last 5 meetings · CSUF 7-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025-26 | HAW 87 @ CSUF 85 | CSUF +3.5 | CSUF W |
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | CSUF 59 @ HAW 69 | — | — |
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | CSUF 57 @ HAW 82 | HAW -11.5 | HAW W |
| Jan 11, 2024-25 | HAW 95 @ CSUF 86 | CSUF +9.5 | CSUF W |
| Feb 1, 2023-24 | HAW 76 @ CSUF 68 | CSUF -2.5 | HAW W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Fullerton
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
19-11
63% covers · avg +3.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 82-92 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 65-93 | +22.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 73-85 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 85-103 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 88-80 | +11.5 | W +19.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 93-97 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | O 190 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 83-69 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 4 | vs | L 91-94 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 177.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 59-69 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 105-86 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 165.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 89-94 | +19.5 | W +14.5 | 176.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 63-110 | +21.5 | L −25.5 | 170.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 95-84 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 64-86 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 88-71 | +13.5 | W +30.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-79 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 173.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 69-74 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 72-81 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 71-61 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 93-78 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 69-83 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 78-72 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-66 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 86-82 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-86 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 93-92 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 88-80 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 85-87 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 75-71 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 90-77 | +5.5 | W +18.5 | 170.5 | U 167 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 82-70 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
WYO
L 82-92
+5.5
10
@
CAL
L 65-93
−5.5
15
vs
PAC
L 73-85
−5.5
21
@
PORT
L 85-103
−11.5
22
vs
STMN
W 88-80
+19.5
23
vs
UNCO
L 93-97
+4.5
29
vs
PEPP
W 83-69
+12.5
4
vs
CP
L 91-94
−4.5
13
@
DEN
W 105-86
+22.5
21
@
OKST
L 89-94
+14.5
28
@
SMU
L 63-110
−25.5
1
vs
UCSB
W 95-84
+14.5
3
vs
UCI
L 64-86
−18.5
8
@
UCSD
W 88-71
+30.5
10
vs
CSUN
W 86-79
+5.5
15
@
UCD
L 69-74
−1.5
17
@
UCR
L 72-81
−12.5
22
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
+6.5
24
@
CP
W 93-78
+13.5
31
@
UCSB
L 69-83
−5.5
5
vs
UCR
W 78-72
+0.5
7
vs
CSUB
W 82-66
+6.5
12
@
LBSU
W 86-82
+6.5
14
@
UCI
L 65-86
−13.5
19
vs
UCD
W 93-92
−0.5
21
@
CSUB
W 88-80
+2.5
28
vs
HAW
L 85-87
+1.5
5
vs
UCSD
W 75-71
+6.5
7
@
CSUN
W 90-77
+18.5
12
vs
UCD
W 82-70
+10.5
covered 19didn’t cover 11avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
WYO
L 82-92
+19.5
10
@
CAL
L 65-93
−4.5
15
vs
PAC
L 73-85
−1.5
21
@
PORT
L 85-103
+23.5
22
vs
STMN
W 88-80
+5.5
23
vs
UNCO
L 93-97
+25.5
29
vs
PEPP
W 83-69
−9.5
4
vs
CP
L 91-94
+7.5
13
@
DEN
W 105-86
+25.5
21
@
OKST
L 89-94
+6.5
28
@
SMU
L 63-110
+2.5
1
vs
UCSB
W 95-84
+23.5
3
vs
UCI
L 64-86
−10.5
8
@
UCSD
W 88-71
−7.5
10
vs
CSUN
W 86-79
−8.5
15
@
UCD
L 69-74
−23.5
17
@
UCR
L 72-81
−4.5
22
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
−28.5
24
@
CP
W 93-78
−2.5
31
@
UCSB
L 69-83
−1.5
5
vs
UCR
W 78-72
−6.5
7
vs
CSUB
W 82-66
−9.5
12
@
LBSU
W 86-82
+11.5
14
@
UCI
L 65-86
−3.5
19
vs
UCD
W 93-92
+28.5
21
@
CSUB
W 88-80
+7.5
28
vs
HAW
L 85-87
+13.5
5
vs
UCSD
W 75-71
−10.5
7
@
CSUN
W 90-77
−3.5
12
vs
UCD
W 82-70
−3.5
over 13under 17avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Hawai'i
28 games played
Straight up
20-8
71% wins
Against the spread
11-15
42% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-13
50% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 59-60 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 100-74 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 88-56 | -41.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 86-56 | -15.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 68-62 | -16.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 76-83 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 92-55 | -18.5 | W +18.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 75-69 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-59 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 66-61 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 88-45 | -8.5 | W +34.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-83 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 86-66 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-77 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 98-71 | -17.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 89-68 | -10.5 | W +10.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 76-87 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-82 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 72-67 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 89-74 | -13.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 60-84 | -2.5 | L −26.5 | 162.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 75-86 | -11.5 | L −22.5 | 160.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 77-73 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 87-85 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 93-74 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 75-84 | -14.5 | L −23.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
ORE
L 59-60
+10.5
10
vs
ETAM
W 100-74
+7.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 88-56
−9.5
14
vs
MAN
W 86-56
+14.5
15
vs
UTU
W 68-62
−10.5
20
vs
ASU
L 76-83
−8.5
28
vs
UND
W 92-55
+18.5
13
vs
UTEP
W 66-61
−7.5
1
@
UCR
W 88-45
+34.5
3
@
UCSD
L 73-83
−7.5
10
vs
UCI
W 67-66
−3.5
15
@
CP
W 86-66
+14.5
17
@
UCSB
L 62-77
−17.5
22
vs
CSUB
W 98-71
+9.5
24
vs
CSUN
W 89-68
+10.5
29
@
UCI
L 76-87
−9.5
31
@
LBSU
W 89-82
−1.5
7
vs
UCSD
W 72-67
−1.5
12
@
CSUB
W 89-74
+1.5
14
@
CSUN
L 60-84
−26.5
19
vs
CP
L 75-86
−22.5
21
vs
UCSB
W 78-75
−2.5
26
@
UCD
W 77-73
+2.5
28
@
CSUF
W 87-85
−1.5
5
vs
UCR
W 93-74
+6.5
7
vs
LBSU
L 75-84
−23.5
covered 11didn’t cover 15avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
ORE
L 59-60
−25.5
10
vs
ETAM
W 100-74
+28.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 88-56
−7.5
14
vs
MAN
W 86-56
−14.5
15
vs
UTU
W 68-62
−19.5
20
vs
ASU
L 76-83
+15.5
28
vs
UND
W 92-55
−2.5
13
vs
UTEP
W 66-61
−11.5
1
@
UCR
W 88-45
−16.5
3
@
UCSD
L 73-83
+7.5
10
vs
UCI
W 67-66
−7.5
15
@
CP
W 86-66
−8.5
17
@
UCSB
L 62-77
−4.5
22
vs
CSUB
W 98-71
+24.5
24
vs
CSUN
W 89-68
−1.5
29
@
UCI
L 76-87
+18.5
31
@
LBSU
W 89-82
+26.5
7
vs
UCSD
W 72-67
−10.5
12
@
CSUB
W 89-74
+11.5
14
@
CSUN
L 60-84
−18.5
19
vs
CP
L 75-86
+0.5
21
vs
UCSB
W 78-75
+7.5
26
@
UCD
W 77-73
+3.5
28
@
CSUF
W 87-85
+13.5
5
vs
UCR
W 93-74
+16.5
7
vs
LBSU
L 75-84
+8.5
over 13under 13avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Fullerton
16-15 overall · 13-8 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs UC Davis82–70
- W@ CSU Northridge90–77
- Wvs UC San Diego75–71
- Lvs Hawai'i85–87
- W@ Bakersfield88–80
1 day since their last game.
Hawai'i
20-8 overall · 14-6 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Long Beach St75–84
- Wvs UC Riverside93–74
- W@ Fullerton87–85
- W@ UC Davis77–73
- Wvs Santa Barbara78–75
6 days since their last game.