Events Center (Binghamton) · at Binghamton · Conference game
Closing line
UALB -4.5✓ BING covered by 1.5
Closing total136.5Over by 14.5
| This season | BING | |
|---|---|---|
| 5-17 | Record | 2-21 |
| 8-14 | ATS | 9-14 |
| 10-12 | O/U | 12-11 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: UALB 74–70 BING · ✓ UALB (64%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UALB | 43 | 34 | 77 |
| BING | 39 | 35 | 74 |
1st half: UALB 43, BING 39 (UALB by 4). The model had UALB by 2.6 and a total of 67.2 (actual 82).
Team stats
| UALB | BING | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-51 45% | Field goals | 22-49 45% |
| 8-21 38% | 3-pointers | 7-19 37% |
| 23-30 77% | Free throws | 23-29 79% |
| 37 10 off | Rebounds | 26 5 off |
| 11 | Assists | 11 |
| 7 | Steals | 11 |
| 1 | Blocks | 5 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 18 | Fouls | 20 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 18 | Fast-break points | 11 |
Players
| UALB | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaden Kempson G | 40 | 11 | 12 | 5 | 3-12 | 0-4 |
| Amir Lindsey G | 40 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 5-10 | 3-7 |
| Tarique Foster G | 38 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 4-9 | 3-7 |
| Okechukwu Okeke F | 31 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 6-12 | 0-0 |
| Isaac Abidde F | 30 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 4-6 | 2-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Ma'Kye Taylor F | 19 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Miles Rose G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Abdoulaye Fall, Wilkin Paulino, Yaya Keita, Ife West-Ingram, Sully Adewale, Nasir Muhammad, Zacharie Matulu, Bautista Giralt, Will Richardson
| BING | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wes Peterson Jr. G | 40 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 6-10 | 3-6 |
| Jeremiah Quigley G | 40 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 5-11 | 0-1 |
| Jackson Benigni G | 37 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 3-9 | 3-7 |
| Bryson Wilson G | 31 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-1 |
| Stephan Snagg F | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Zyier Beverly F | 26 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-1 |
| Jake Blackburn G | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
Did not play: Ryan Richardson, Jayden Kelsey, Sayerr Senghore, Nevin Ibroci, Evan Ashe, Demetrius Lilley, Jayden Lemond
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUALB -4.5
ModelUALB -4.2
Model edgeBING +0.3
W BING covered
Total
Market136.5
Model143.5
Model edgeOver 7.0
W Over
Projected score
UALB 73.9 · BING 69.6
UALB 77 · BING 74
Win probability
UALB 64%
1st half
Spread
UALB -2.6
UALB -4.0
Total
67.2
82 points
Projected score
UALB 34.9 · BING 32.3
UALB 43 · BING 39
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUALB -4.5
no move
CloseUALB -4.5
No change since the open
Total
Open138.5
▼ 2
Close136.5
Down 2 since the open
Moneyline
UALB -218 · BING +180
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UALB -4.5 · unchangedmodel UALB -4
model UALB -4
Opened 138.5 · closed 136.5 · moved 2 downmodel 143.5
model 143.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
UALB 5–5 BINGSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · UALB has won the last 2 meetings · UALB 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2025-26 | BING 53 @ UALB 69 | UALB -8.5 | UALB W |
| Mar 8, 2024-25 | BING 66 @ UALB 69 | UALB -8.5 | BING W |
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | BING 65 @ UALB 61 | UALB -6.5 | BING W |
| Jan 18, 2024-25 | UALB 70 @ BING 65 | BING +2.5 | UALB W |
| Feb 8, 2023-24 | UALB 57 @ BING 69 | BING -3.5 | BING W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UAlbany
22 games played
Straight up
5-17
23% wins
Against the spread
8-14
36% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-12
45% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 53-80 | +24.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 62-83 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 61-80 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 63-73 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 67-69 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 68-88 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 65-93 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 82-93 | +17.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 79-105 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 71-55 | +10.5 | W +26.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 75-83 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 67-96 | +19.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-46 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 69-53 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 75-68 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 49-52 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 101 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 72-80 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 68-77 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-68 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 65-63 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 79-89 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MARQ
L 53-80
−2.5
8
@
MASS
L 62-83
−11.5
14
@
URI
L 61-80
−3.5
21
@
SIE
L 63-73
+0.5
28
vs
COLG
L 67-69
+5.5
29
vs
FOR
L 68-88
−9.5
6
@
COLU
L 65-93
−14.5
10
vs
YALE
L 82-93
+6.5
13
@
FAU
L 79-105
−7.5
17
@
STBK
W 71-55
+26.5
21
vs
COR
L 75-83
−1.5
30
@
SC
L 67-96
−9.5
3
@
UML
L 71-83
−9.5
10
vs
BRY
W 71-46
+21.5
15
vs
BING
W 69-53
+7.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-68
+12.5
22
@
ME
L 49-52
−5.5
24
@
UNH
L 72-80
−5.5
29
vs
NJIT
L 68-77
−14.5
31
vs
UMBC
L 65-68
−1.5
5
@
BRY
W 65-63
+3.5
7
vs
UML
L 79-89
−14.5
covered 8didn’t cover 14avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MARQ
L 53-80
−16.5
8
@
MASS
L 62-83
−10.5
14
@
URI
L 61-80
−9.5
21
@
SIE
L 63-73
−4.5
28
vs
COLG
L 67-69
−5.5
29
vs
FOR
L 68-88
+12.5
6
@
COLU
L 65-93
+13.5
10
vs
YALE
L 82-93
+29.5
13
@
FAU
L 79-105
+36.5
17
@
STBK
W 71-55
−20.5
21
vs
COR
L 75-83
−9.5
30
@
SC
L 67-96
+14.5
3
@
UML
L 71-83
+3.5
10
vs
BRY
W 71-46
−19.5
15
vs
BING
W 69-53
−16.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-68
+3.5
22
@
ME
L 49-52
−30.5
24
@
UNH
L 72-80
+14.5
29
vs
NJIT
L 68-77
+5.5
31
vs
UMBC
L 65-68
−8.5
5
@
BRY
W 65-63
−5.5
7
vs
UML
L 79-89
+24.5
over 10under 12avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Binghamton
23 games played
Straight up
2-21
9% wins
Against the spread
9-14
39% covers · avg −3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-11
52% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 47-85 | +21.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 59-67 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 70-83 | +27.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 82-90 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 52-63 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 66-75 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 80-71 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 63-78 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 67-84 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 63-103 | +24.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 61-82 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-95 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 59-60 | +20.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 53-69 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 60-78 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 82-88 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 63-79 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 63-60 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 62-79 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 64-73 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 65-73 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | O 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−16.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−10.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+14.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+7.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−16.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
−6.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+12.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−12.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
−9.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
−15.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
−13.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+2.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−11.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
+19.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
+1.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−7.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−13.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+3.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
−10.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
+5.5
5
@
UMBC
L 62-79
−5.5
7
@
NJIT
L 64-73
−0.5
12
vs
UVM
L 65-73
+3.5
covered 9didn’t cover 14avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−21.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+11.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+24.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−10.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
+11.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+11.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−3.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
+17.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
+31.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
+10.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+39.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−2.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
−21.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
−5.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−16.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−2.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+34.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
+17.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
−7.5
5
@
UMBC
L 62-79
+2.5
7
@
NJIT
L 64-73
−3.5
12
vs
UVM
L 65-73
+1.5
over 12under 11avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UAlbany
5-17 overall · 4-6 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UMass Lowell79–89
- W@ Bryant65–63
- Lvs UMBC65–68
- Lvs NJIT68–77
- L@ New Hampshire72–80
A week or more of rest.
Binghamton
2-21 overall · 1-10 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Vermont65–73
- L@ NJIT64–73
- L@ UMBC62–79
- Wvs Bryant63–60
- L@ Maine63–79
2 days since their last game.