Titan Gym · at Fullerton · Conference game
Closing line
HAW -3.5✓ CSUF covered by 1.5
Closing total158.5Over by 13.5
| This season | CSUF | |
|---|---|---|
| 18-7 | Record | 13-14 |
| 10-13 | ATS | 15-11 |
| 10-13 | O/U | 12-14 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: HAW 81–76 CSUF · ✓ HAW (67%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAW | 32 | 55 | 87 |
| CSUF | 35 | 50 | 85 |
1st half: HAW 32, CSUF 35 (CSUF by 3). The model had HAW by 3.2 and a total of 73.4 (actual 67).
Team stats
| HAW | CSUF | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-59 47% | Field goals | 28-60 47% |
| 14-39 36% | 3-pointers | 11-26 42% |
| 17-20 85% | Free throws | 18-26 69% |
| 37 9 off | Rebounds | 33 8 off |
| 21 | Assists | 18 |
| 5 | Steals | 8 |
| 4 | Blocks | 1 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 7 |
| 21 | Fouls | 22 |
| 28 | Points in paint | 30 |
| 10 | Fast-break points | 21 |
Players
| HAW | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harry Rouhliadeff F | 35 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3-5 | 2-3 |
| Isaac Finlinson F | 33 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-6 |
| Dre Bullock G | 32 | 27 | 8 | 3 | 10-15 | 5-8 |
| Isaac Johnson C | 24 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 5-11 | 3-8 |
| Hunter Erickson G | 21 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Isaiah Kerr G | 30 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 3-11 | 2-9 |
| Gytis Nemeiksa F | 13 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Yacine Toumi F | 8 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| AJ Economou G | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Hunter Carter, Aaron Hunkin-Claytor, Tanner Cuff, Jalen Myers
| CSUF | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua Ward G | 38 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 6-9 | 0-0 |
| Jefferson De La Cruz Monegro G | 31 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-2 |
| Landon Seaman F | 26 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 4-10 | 3-7 |
| Christian Williams G | 20 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 2-3 |
| Bryce Cofield G | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jaden Henderson G | 23 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-6 |
| Bailey Nunn G | 18 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 3-4 | 3-3 |
| KJ Garris Jr. G | 18 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-3 |
| Kendrick De Luna F | 14 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Davis White G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Matthew Quinlan, Ben Winker, Nicholas Khatchikian, Cam Smith, Karan Kolappa, Yesan Warren, Kidus Tilahun
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketHAW -3.5
ModelHAW -5.1
Model edgeHAW +1.6
L CSUF covered
Total
Market158.5
Model157.0
Model edgeUnder 1.5
L Over
Projected score
HAW 81.1 · CSUF 76
HAW 87 · CSUF 85
Win probability
HAW 67%
1st half
Spread
HAW -3.2
CSUF -3.0
Total
73.4
67 points
Projected score
HAW 38.3 · CSUF 35.1
HAW 32 · CSUF 35
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenHAW -3.5
no move
CloseHAW -3.5
No change since the open
Total
Open156.5
▲ 2
Close158.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
HAW -175 · CSUF +145
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened HAW -3.5 · unchangedmodel HAW -5
model HAW -5
Opened 156.5 · closed 158.5 · moved 2 upmodel 157
model 157
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
HAW 5–5 CSUFSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · HAW has won the last 4 meetings · HAW 3-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | CSUF 59 @ HAW 69 | — | — |
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | CSUF 57 @ HAW 82 | HAW -11.5 | HAW W |
| Jan 11, 2024-25 | HAW 95 @ CSUF 86 | CSUF +9.5 | CSUF W |
| Feb 1, 2023-24 | HAW 76 @ CSUF 68 | CSUF -2.5 | HAW W |
| Dec 30, 2023-24 | CSUF 63 @ HAW 61 | HAW -8 | CSUF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Hawai'i
25 games played
Straight up
18-7
72% wins
Against the spread
10-13
43% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-13
43% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 59-60 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 100-74 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 88-56 | -41.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 86-56 | -15.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 68-62 | -16.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 76-83 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 92-55 | -18.5 | W +18.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 75-69 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-59 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 66-61 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 88-45 | -8.5 | W +34.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-83 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 86-66 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-77 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 98-71 | -17.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 89-68 | -10.5 | W +10.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 76-87 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-82 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 72-67 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 89-74 | -13.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 60-84 | -2.5 | L −26.5 | 162.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 75-86 | -11.5 | L −22.5 | 160.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 77-73 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
ORE
L 59-60
+10.5
10
vs
ETAM
W 100-74
+7.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 88-56
−9.5
14
vs
MAN
W 86-56
+14.5
15
vs
UTU
W 68-62
−10.5
20
vs
ASU
L 76-83
−8.5
28
vs
UND
W 92-55
+18.5
13
vs
UTEP
W 66-61
−7.5
1
@
UCR
W 88-45
+34.5
3
@
UCSD
L 73-83
−7.5
10
vs
UCI
W 67-66
−3.5
15
@
CP
W 86-66
+14.5
17
@
UCSB
L 62-77
−17.5
22
vs
CSUB
W 98-71
+9.5
24
vs
CSUN
W 89-68
+10.5
29
@
UCI
L 76-87
−9.5
31
@
LBSU
W 89-82
−1.5
7
vs
UCSD
W 72-67
−1.5
12
@
CSUB
W 89-74
+1.5
14
@
CSUN
L 60-84
−26.5
19
vs
CP
L 75-86
−22.5
21
vs
UCSB
W 78-75
−2.5
26
@
UCD
W 77-73
+2.5
covered 10didn’t cover 13avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
ORE
L 59-60
−25.5
10
vs
ETAM
W 100-74
+28.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 88-56
−7.5
14
vs
MAN
W 86-56
−14.5
15
vs
UTU
W 68-62
−19.5
20
vs
ASU
L 76-83
+15.5
28
vs
UND
W 92-55
−2.5
13
vs
UTEP
W 66-61
−11.5
1
@
UCR
W 88-45
−16.5
3
@
UCSD
L 73-83
+7.5
10
vs
UCI
W 67-66
−7.5
15
@
CP
W 86-66
−8.5
17
@
UCSB
L 62-77
−4.5
22
vs
CSUB
W 98-71
+24.5
24
vs
CSUN
W 89-68
−1.5
29
@
UCI
L 76-87
+18.5
31
@
LBSU
W 89-82
+26.5
7
vs
UCSD
W 72-67
−10.5
12
@
CSUB
W 89-74
+11.5
14
@
CSUN
L 60-84
−18.5
19
vs
CP
L 75-86
+0.5
21
vs
UCSB
W 78-75
+7.5
26
@
UCD
W 77-73
+3.5
over 10under 13avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fullerton
27 games played
Straight up
13-14
48% wins
Against the spread
15-11
58% covers · avg +2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-14
46% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 82-92 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 65-93 | +22.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 73-85 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 85-103 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 88-80 | +11.5 | W +19.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 93-97 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | O 190 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 83-69 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 4 | vs | L 91-94 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 177.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 59-69 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 105-86 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 165.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 89-94 | +19.5 | W +14.5 | 176.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 63-110 | +21.5 | L −25.5 | 170.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 95-84 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 64-86 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 88-71 | +13.5 | W +30.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-79 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 173.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 69-74 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 72-81 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 71-61 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 93-78 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 69-83 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 78-72 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-66 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 86-82 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-86 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 93-92 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 88-80 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
WYO
L 82-92
+5.5
10
@
CAL
L 65-93
−5.5
15
vs
PAC
L 73-85
−5.5
21
@
PORT
L 85-103
−11.5
22
vs
STMN
W 88-80
+19.5
23
vs
UNCO
L 93-97
+4.5
29
vs
PEPP
W 83-69
+12.5
4
vs
CP
L 91-94
−4.5
13
@
DEN
W 105-86
+22.5
21
@
OKST
L 89-94
+14.5
28
@
SMU
L 63-110
−25.5
1
vs
UCSB
W 95-84
+14.5
3
vs
UCI
L 64-86
−18.5
8
@
UCSD
W 88-71
+30.5
10
vs
CSUN
W 86-79
+5.5
15
@
UCD
L 69-74
−1.5
17
@
UCR
L 72-81
−12.5
22
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
+6.5
24
@
CP
W 93-78
+13.5
31
@
UCSB
L 69-83
−5.5
5
vs
UCR
W 78-72
+0.5
7
vs
CSUB
W 82-66
+6.5
12
@
LBSU
W 86-82
+6.5
14
@
UCI
L 65-86
−13.5
19
vs
UCD
W 93-92
−0.5
21
@
CSUB
W 88-80
+2.5
covered 15didn’t cover 11avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
WYO
L 82-92
+19.5
10
@
CAL
L 65-93
−4.5
15
vs
PAC
L 73-85
−1.5
21
@
PORT
L 85-103
+23.5
22
vs
STMN
W 88-80
+5.5
23
vs
UNCO
L 93-97
+25.5
29
vs
PEPP
W 83-69
−9.5
4
vs
CP
L 91-94
+7.5
13
@
DEN
W 105-86
+25.5
21
@
OKST
L 89-94
+6.5
28
@
SMU
L 63-110
+2.5
1
vs
UCSB
W 95-84
+23.5
3
vs
UCI
L 64-86
−10.5
8
@
UCSD
W 88-71
−7.5
10
vs
CSUN
W 86-79
−8.5
15
@
UCD
L 69-74
−23.5
17
@
UCR
L 72-81
−4.5
22
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
−28.5
24
@
CP
W 93-78
−2.5
31
@
UCSB
L 69-83
−1.5
5
vs
UCR
W 78-72
−6.5
7
vs
CSUB
W 82-66
−9.5
12
@
LBSU
W 86-82
+11.5
14
@
UCI
L 65-86
−3.5
19
vs
UCD
W 93-92
+28.5
21
@
CSUB
W 88-80
+7.5
over 12under 14avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Hawai'i
18-7 overall · 12-5 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ UC Davis77–73
- Wvs Santa Barbara78–75
- Lvs Cal Poly75–86
- L@ CSU Northridge60–84
- W@ Bakersfield89–74
2 days since their last game.
Fullerton
13-14 overall · 10-7 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Bakersfield88–80
- Wvs UC Davis93–92
- L@ UC Irvine65–86
- W@ Long Beach St86–82
- Wvs Bakersfield82–66
A week or more of rest.