J. Lawrence Walkup Skydome · at N Arizona · Conference game
Closing line
NAU -2.5✓ NAU covered by 2.5
Closing total154.5Under by 1.5
| This season | NAU | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-15 | Record | 6-17 |
| 11-10 | ATS | 12-11 |
| 13-8 | O/U | 10-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SAC 76–76 NAU · ✗ NAU (50%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAC | 25 | 49 | 74 |
| NAU | 38 | 41 | 79 |
1st half: SAC 25, NAU 38 (NAU by 13). The model had SAC by 0.1 and a total of 71.1 (actual 63).
Team stats
| SAC | NAU | |
|---|---|---|
| 25-56 45% | Field goals | 25-51 49% |
| 4-21 19% | 3-pointers | 8-26 31% |
| 20-26 77% | Free throws | 21-33 64% |
| 33 10 off | Rebounds | 30 8 off |
| 6 | Assists | 15 |
| 5 | Steals | 8 |
| 1 | Blocks | 2 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 22 | Fouls | 20 |
| 42 | Points in paint | 30 |
| 2 | Fast-break points | 2 |
Players
| SAC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jahni Summers G | 39 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 7-16 | 2-9 |
| Jayden Teat G | 31 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-6 |
| Mark Lavrenov F | 30 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| Shaqir O'Neal F | 21 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 3-4 | 1-1 |
| Taj Glover G | 21 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Prophet Johnson G | 32 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-0 |
| Arman Madi G | 26 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 4-12 | 0-3 |
Did not play: Jeremiah Nyarko, Mikey Williams, Isaiah Bronson, Zach Anderson, Romari Robinson, Brandon Gardner, Bear Cherry, Davis Ambuehl
| NAU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Komin G | 39 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 1-2 |
| Diego Campisano F | 38 | 18 | 11 | 1 | 5-13 | 3-8 |
| Ryan Abelman G | 38 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-6 |
| Traivar Jackson F | 17 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Oakland Fort G | 15 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2-4 | 1-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Brennan Peterson G | 31 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 2-5 |
| Karl Poom F | 22 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 6-10 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Erez Poran, JT Amundsen, Kavon Bradford, Walker Timme, Zack Davidson, Arne Osojnik, Isaiah Shaw
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketNAU -2.5
ModelNAU -0.1
Model edgeSAC +2.5
L NAU covered
Total
Market154.5
Model152.0
Model edgeUnder 2.5
W Under
Projected score
SAC 76 · NAU 76
SAC 74 · NAU 79
Win probability
NAU 50%
1st half
Spread
SAC -0.1
NAU -13.0
Total
71.1
63 points
Projected score
SAC 35.6 · NAU 35.5
SAC 25 · NAU 38
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenNAU -1.5
1 → NAU
CloseNAU -2.5
1 pt toward NAU
Total
Open154.5
no move
Close154.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
SAC +114 · NAU -135
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened NAU -1.5 · closed NAU -2.5 · moved 1 toward NAUmodel NAU -0
model NAU -0
Opened 154.5 · unchangedmodel 152
model 152
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
SAC 2–7 NAUNAU leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · SAC 1-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2025-26 | NAU 69 @ SAC 83 | SAC -1.5 | SAC W |
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | NAU 65 @ SAC 61 | SAC +3.5 | NAU W |
| Jan 16, 2024-25 | SAC 53 @ NAU 77 | NAU -8.5 | NAU W |
| Feb 15, 2023-24 | NAU 73 @ SAC 58 | SAC -3.5 | NAU W |
| Jan 20, 2023-24 | SAC 61 @ NAU 70 | NAU -2.5 | NAU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Sacramento St
21 games played
Straight up
6-15
29% wins
Against the spread
11-10
52% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-8
62% overs · avg +4.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11 | vs | L 87-92 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 73-77 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 64-62 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 48-79 | +27.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 67-91 | +21.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 54-68 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 88-110 | +29.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | O 198 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 67-74 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 88-100 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 84-97 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 82-95 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 168.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-96 | +9.5 | L −17.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 83-69 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 93-89 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 163.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 76-86 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 67-75 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 83-80 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 86-79 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 104-90 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 73-74 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 79-95 | +11.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | O 174 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
11
vs
UCSB
L 87-92
+2.5
14
@
UCD
L 73-77
+0.5
16
vs
PRES
W 64-62
−4.5
18
@
UCLA
L 48-79
−3.5
21
@
CAL
L 67-91
−2.5
29
@
PAC
L 54-68
−3.5
2
@
BAY
L 88-110
+7.5
20
@
CBU
L 67-74
+7.5
22
@
CSUN
L 88-100
−3.5
1
@
IDST
L 84-97
−4.5
3
@
WEB
L 82-95
−6.5
10
@
PRST
L 69-96
−17.5
15
vs
NAU
W 83-69
+12.5
17
vs
UNCO
W 93-89
+10.5
22
@
IDHO
L 76-86
+0.5
24
@
EWU
L 67-75
−2.5
29
vs
MTST
W 83-80
+7.5
31
vs
MONT
W 86-79
+10.5
2
vs
WEB
W 104-90
+12.5
7
vs
PRST
L 73-74
+2.5
12
@
UNCO
L 79-95
−4.5
covered 11didn’t cover 10avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
11
vs
UCSB
L 87-92
+17.5
14
@
UCD
L 73-77
−1.5
16
vs
PRES
W 64-62
−24.5
18
@
UCLA
L 48-79
−19.5
21
@
CAL
L 67-91
+3.5
29
@
PAC
L 54-68
−24.5
2
@
BAY
L 88-110
+39.5
20
@
CBU
L 67-74
−17.5
22
@
CSUN
L 88-100
+23.5
1
@
IDST
L 84-97
+27.5
3
@
WEB
L 82-95
+8.5
10
@
PRST
L 69-96
+4.5
15
vs
NAU
W 83-69
−1.5
17
vs
UNCO
W 93-89
+18.5
22
@
IDHO
L 76-86
+0.5
24
@
EWU
L 67-75
−21.5
29
vs
MTST
W 83-80
+9.5
31
vs
MONT
W 86-79
+9.5
2
vs
WEB
W 104-90
+31.5
7
vs
PRST
L 73-74
−3.5
12
@
UNCO
L 79-95
+9.5
over 13under 8avg +4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
N Arizona
23 games played
Straight up
6-17
26% wins
Against the spread
12-11
52% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-13
43% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 71-77 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 49-84 | +35.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 93-87 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 62-75 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-69 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 48-73 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 69-78 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 65-57 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 66-90 | +6.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 64-78 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 68-77 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 65-78 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 79-81 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 69-83 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 52-63 | +11.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 72-98 | +3.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-77 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 92-86 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 62-79 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 79-73 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 53-72 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 68-77 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
DRKE
L 71-77
+2.5
11
@
ARIZ
L 49-84
+0.5
24
vs
CP
W 93-87
+7.5
26
vs
SEMO
W 79-72
+4.5
3
vs
SDST
L 62-75
−10.5
6
@
NDSU
L 68-69
+11.5
9
@
ASU
L 48-73
−8.5
13
@
USD
L 69-78
−4.5
18
vs
SUU
W 65-57
+2.5
21
@
UIW
L 66-90
−17.5
1
@
MONT
L 64-78
−8.5
3
@
MTST
L 68-77
+1.5
8
vs
WEB
L 65-78
−10.5
10
vs
IDST
L 79-81
+2.5
15
@
SAC
L 69-83
−12.5
17
@
PRST
L 52-63
+0.5
19
vs
MONT
L 72-98
−22.5
24
vs
UNCO
W 81-77
+10.5
29
vs
EWU
W 92-86
+8.5
31
vs
IDHO
L 62-79
−11.5
5
@
IDST
W 79-73
+14.5
7
@
WEB
L 53-72
−11.5
12
vs
PRST
L 68-77
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 11avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
DRKE
L 71-77
+3.5
11
@
ARIZ
L 49-84
−30.5
24
vs
CP
W 93-87
+15.5
26
vs
SEMO
W 79-72
−2.5
3
vs
SDST
L 62-75
−11.5
6
@
NDSU
L 68-69
−10.5
9
@
ASU
L 48-73
−33.5
13
@
USD
L 69-78
−2.5
18
vs
SUU
W 65-57
−28.5
21
@
UIW
L 66-90
+15.5
1
@
MONT
L 64-78
−7.5
3
@
MTST
L 68-77
+1.5
8
vs
WEB
L 65-78
−6.5
10
vs
IDST
L 79-81
+20.5
15
@
SAC
L 69-83
−1.5
17
@
PRST
L 52-63
−25.5
19
vs
MONT
L 72-98
+23.5
24
vs
UNCO
W 81-77
+7.5
29
vs
EWU
W 92-86
+32.5
31
vs
IDHO
L 62-79
−5.5
5
@
IDST
W 79-73
+10.5
7
@
WEB
L 53-72
−25.5
12
vs
PRST
L 68-77
+8.5
over 10under 13avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Sacramento St
6-15 overall · 5-7 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ N Colorado79–95
- Lvs Portland St73–74
- Wvs Weber St104–90
- Wvs Montana86–79
- Wvs Montana St83–80
2 days since their last game.
N Arizona
6-17 overall · 3-10 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Portland St68–77
- L@ Weber St53–72
- W@ Idaho St79–73
- Lvs Idaho62–79
- Wvs E Washington92–86
2 days since their last game.