Cam Henderson Center · at Marshall
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MRSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MRSH 77–75 · win probability MRSH 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MRSH has more of the edges
BCU 2, MRSH 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: BCU 40.9, MRSH 29.2. Allowed: BCU 38.6, MRSH 41.1
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BCU 19.2%, MRSH 16.6%. Forced: BCU 15.8%, MRSH 16.2%
BCU offense vs MRSH defense
Offense 188th of 366 against a defense 277th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
BCU hits 33.0% and allows 32.9%; MRSH hits 36.8% and allows 33.6%. Threes are 29.7% and 44.3% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: BCU 51.0 and allows 49.7; MRSH 54.8 and allows 50.3
Home court
MRSH at home. This season: MRSH 0-0 at home, BCU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: BCU plays 71.8 a game (43rd fastest), MRSH 70.7 (86th). Faster games mean more points
Even
MRSH offense vs BCU defense
Offense 198th of 366 against a defense 218th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
BCU has played the 244th-hardest schedule, MRSH the 234th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BCU 25%, MRSH 27%. Transfers in: BCU 9, MRSH 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BCU 30.1%, MRSH 31.9%. Defensive: BCU 68.3%, MRSH 66.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MRSH -2.2 | — |
| Total | — | 152.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | BCU 75.1 · MRSH 77.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MRSH -1.2 | — |
| 1H total | 71.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | BCU 35 · MRSH 36.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 2-8 20% | 9-1 90% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 8 | @ UVA | L41–59LU |
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bethune
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-13
58% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 90-95 | +24.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 61-101 | +16.5 | L −23.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 82-91 | +21.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 76-73 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 64-69 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 54-61 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 56-100 | +29.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 80-59 | -13.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 60-82 | +20.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-112 | +26.5 | L −32.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 71-107 | +39.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 77-103 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 87-83 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 74-65 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 73-77 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 79-63 | -16.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 87-82 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-48 | -8.5 | W +28.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 82-73 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 69-54 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 80-62 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-76 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 79-69 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 55-57 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 86-91 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 82-71 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 76-71 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 82-79 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 77-81 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 67-71 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
AUB
L 90-95
+19.5
6
@
MIA
L 61-101
−23.5
15
@
DAY
L 82-91
+12.5
19
@
OHIO
W 76-73
+9.5
24
vs
JAX
L 64-69
−8.5
25
vs
STBK
L 54-61
−11.5
29
@
IU
L 56-100
−14.5
5
vs
SCST
W 80-59
+7.5
14
@
MIZ
L 60-82
−1.5
17
@
SLU
L 53-112
−32.5
22
@
ARIZ
L 71-107
+3.5
29
@
OKST
L 77-103
−5.5
3
vs
FAMU
W 87-83
−3.5
10
vs
GRAM
W 74-65
+5.5
12
vs
SOU
L 73-77
−7.5
17
@
MVSU
W 79-63
−0.5
19
@
UAPB
W 87-82
+2.5
24
vs
JKST
W 85-48
+28.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 82-73
−4.5
31
@
ALST
W 69-54
+13.5
2
@
AAMU
W 80-62
+15.5
7
vs
PV
W 82-76
−4.5
9
vs
TXSO
W 79-69
+2.5
14
@
ALCN
L 55-57
−10.5
16
@
JKST
L 86-91
−9.5
19
vs
ALST
W 82-71
+5.5
21
vs
AAMU
W 85-76
+2.5
26
@
GRAM
W 76-71
+6.5
28
@
SOU
W 82-79
+5.5
5
@
FAMU
L 77-81
−6.5
11
vs
PV
L 67-71
−9.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
AUB
L 90-95
+31.5
6
@
MIA
L 61-101
+7.5
15
@
DAY
L 82-91
+24.5
19
@
OHIO
W 76-73
−8.5
24
vs
JAX
L 64-69
−10.5
25
vs
STBK
L 54-61
−30.5
29
@
IU
L 56-100
+7.5
5
vs
SCST
W 80-59
−9.5
14
@
MIZ
L 60-82
−4.5
17
@
SLU
L 53-112
+7.5
22
@
ARIZ
L 71-107
+23.5
29
@
OKST
L 77-103
+15.5
3
vs
FAMU
W 87-83
+24.5
10
vs
GRAM
W 74-65
−5.5
12
vs
SOU
L 73-77
−1.5
17
@
MVSU
W 79-63
−2.5
19
@
UAPB
W 87-82
+13.5
24
vs
JKST
W 85-48
−23.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 82-73
+7.5
31
@
ALST
W 69-54
−29.5
2
@
AAMU
W 80-62
+0.5
7
vs
PV
W 82-76
+0.5
9
vs
TXSO
W 79-69
−4.5
14
@
ALCN
L 55-57
−32.5
16
@
JKST
L 86-91
+26.5
19
vs
ALST
W 82-71
+5.5
21
vs
AAMU
W 85-76
+18.5
26
@
GRAM
W 76-71
+2.5
28
@
SOU
W 82-79
+7.5
5
@
FAMU
L 77-81
+12.5
11
vs
PV
L 67-71
−9.5
over 18under 13avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Marshall
31 games played
Straight up
18-13
58% wins
Against the spread
10-21
32% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-12
61% overs · avg +4.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 78-72 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 85-73 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 96-89 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 78-104 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 98-70 | -20.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 69-60 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 67-90 | -7.5 | L −30.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-70 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 81-88 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 77-61 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 76-74 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 84-80 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-81 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 66-64 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-81 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 83-85 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 77-72 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 115-60 | -18.5 | W +36.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 68-72 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 70-61 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 165.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 81-77 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 74-90 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 81-79 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 87-101 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 162.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 84-80 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 94-93 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-79 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 97-88 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 82-99 | -7.5 | L −24.5 | 168.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 78-82 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MASS
W 78-72
+10.5
8
@
TOL
W 85-73
+14.5
12
vs
ELON
W 96-89
−1.5
15
@
UVA
L 78-104
−5.5
20
vs
UAPB
W 98-70
+7.5
23
vs
MERC
W 69-60
−2.5
26
vs
LIP
L 67-90
−30.5
3
@
UNCW
L 69-70
+7.5
6
@
OHIO
L 81-88
−3.5
10
vs
WKU
W 77-61
+14.5
13
vs
WRST
W 76-74
−1.5
20
@
TROY
L 63-70
−2.5
31
vs
GAST
W 84-80
−9.5
3
vs
APP
W 88-81
−0.5
7
@
JMU
W 66-64
+3.5
10
@
GAST
L 73-81
−12.5
14
vs
CCU
L 83-85
−11.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-72
−1.5
22
vs
ULM
W 115-60
+36.5
28
@
TXST
L 68-72
−7.5
31
@
ARST
W 70-61
+12.5
4
vs
USM
W 81-77
−6.5
7
vs
M-OH
L 74-90
−14.5
11
@
ODU
W 81-79
−1.5
14
@
GASO
L 87-101
−16.5
16
vs
USA
W 84-80
−2.5
19
@
APP
W 94-93
+4.5
21
@
CCU
L 75-79
−6.5
24
vs
ODU
W 97-88
+1.5
27
vs
GASO
L 82-99
−24.5
8
vs
GASO
L 78-82
−6.5
covered 10didn’t cover 21avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MASS
W 78-72
−2.5
8
@
TOL
W 85-73
−2.5
12
vs
ELON
W 96-89
+29.5
15
@
UVA
L 78-104
+26.5
20
vs
UAPB
W 98-70
+3.5
23
vs
MERC
W 69-60
−18.5
26
vs
LIP
L 67-90
−0.5
3
@
UNCW
L 69-70
−11.5
6
@
OHIO
L 81-88
+11.5
10
vs
WKU
W 77-61
−21.5
13
vs
WRST
W 76-74
+0.5
20
@
TROY
L 63-70
−22.5
31
vs
GAST
W 84-80
+12.5
3
vs
APP
W 88-81
+27.5
7
@
JMU
W 66-64
−22.5
10
@
GAST
L 73-81
+0.5
14
vs
CCU
L 83-85
+16.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-72
−0.5
22
vs
ULM
W 115-60
+14.5
28
@
TXST
L 68-72
−7.5
31
@
ARST
W 70-61
−34.5
4
vs
USM
W 81-77
+9.5
7
vs
M-OH
L 74-90
+1.5
11
@
ODU
W 81-79
+4.5
14
@
GASO
L 87-101
+25.5
16
vs
USA
W 84-80
+13.5
19
@
APP
W 94-93
+43.5
21
@
CCU
L 75-79
+0.5
24
vs
ODU
W 97-88
+25.5
27
vs
GASO
L 82-99
+12.5
8
vs
GASO
L 78-82
−6.5
over 19under 12avg +4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Bethune has the better starters
Position by position: Bethune 3, Marshall 1, even 1
BethuneBetterMarshall
G K. Branch TR11.7 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 24
→MRSHSmall
G N. Otshudi14.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 45
G J. Morris TR11.2 pts · 2.5 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 49
=Even
G F. Oshodi TR8.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 47
G J. Jones TR9.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 43
←BCUSmall
G L. Rasmussen TR2.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 15
F Q. Heady10.2 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 55
←BCUBig
G D. Johnson TR2.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 17
F D. Johnson TR10 pts · 5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 52
←BCUBig
F E. Harding3.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 11
BethuneBetterMarshall
BCU offense188th of 366 · -5.8
←BCUSmall
MRSH defense277th of 366 · -7.0
BCU defense218th of 366 · -5.7
=Even
MRSH offense198th of 366 · -6.1
Backcourt-4.2 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-4.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.3 · 2 players
←BCUSmall
Frontcourt-1.5 · 1 player
Bench-1.6 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-1.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBCU betterMRSH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Branch30 min · TRJ. Morris30 min · TRJ. Jones28 min · TRM. Jordan13 min · TRK. Patton8 min · TRK. MurphyNew
Forwards
Q. Heady26 minD. Johnson26 min · TRD. Perez-Rouzan24 minV. Boskovic21 min · TRI. Ezuma8 min · TRJ. SmithNew
Centers
M. Martinez16 min · TR
Guards
N. Otshudi32 minF. Oshodi20 min · TRL. Rasmussen15 min · TRD. Johnson15 min · TRB. Slay8 minE. Manyuon2 min · TR
Forwards
E. Harding14 minC. Langdon3 min · TRV. Kuridza2 min · TRB. DjigoNew
Centers
K. Maker6 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.5 #175 | Points per game | 80.5 #56 |
| 1.04 #273 | Points per possession | 1.14 #71 |
| 71.8 #43 | Pace (possessions) | 70.7 #86 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #195 | Effective FG% | 54.8 #42 |
| 33.0 #230 | 3-point % | 36.8 #34 |
| 29.7 #353 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.3 #82 |
| 40.9 #48 | Free throw rate | 29.2 #328 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.2 #329 | Turnover rate | 16.6 #172 |
| 30.1 #194 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.9 #127 |
| 13.3 #195 | Assists per game | 16.2 #43 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.5 #251 | Points allowed | 78.9 #292 |
| 1.08 #157 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #253 |
| 49.7 #88 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.3 #118 |
| 32.9 #112 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.6 #162 |
| 15.8 #229 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #206 |
| 68.3 #242 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.2 #316 |
| 6.8 #147 | Steals per game | 6.1 #225 |
| 4.5 #34 | Blocks per game | 4.8 #23 |
Bethune
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 14-5 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View67–71
- L@ Florida A&M77–81
- W@ Southern82–79
- W@ Grambling76–71
- Wvs Alabama A&M85–76
A week or more of rest.
Marshall
18-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern78–82
- Lvs GA Southern82–99
- Wvs Old Dominion97–88
- L@ Coastal75–79
- W@ App State94–93
A week or more of rest.