PPG Paints Arena · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
SLU -6.5✓ SLU covered by 0.5
Closing total158.5Over by 10.5
| This season | SLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 17-14 | Record | 26-4 |
| 14-17 | ATS | 18-12 |
| 14-17 | O/U | 14-16 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: GW 79–84 SLU · ✓ SLU (64%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GW | 48 | 33 | 81 |
| SLU | 34 | 54 | 88 |
1st half: GW 48, SLU 34 (GW by 14). The model had SLU by 2.3 and a total of 76.1 (actual 82).
Team stats
| GW | SLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-70 40% | Field goals | 27-59 46% |
| 13-39 33% | 3-pointers | 10-30 33% |
| 12-20 60% | Free throws | 24-26 92% |
| 41 16 off | Rebounds | 37 7 off |
| 15 | Assists | 19 |
| 5 | Steals | 7 |
| 2 | Blocks | 2 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 21 | Fouls | 16 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 34 |
| 13 | Fast-break points | 10 |
Players
| GW | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean Aranguren G | 33 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 5-11 | 1-4 |
| Trey Autry G | 30 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 6-13 | 4-11 |
| Christian Jones G | 29 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 3-7 | 1-3 |
| Rafael Castro F | 26 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| Luke Hunger F | 19 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Tyrone Marshall Jr. F | 28 | 14 | 13 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-4 |
| Tre Dinkins G | 17 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2-10 | 2-9 |
| Garrett Johnson F | 13 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3-8 | 2-4 |
| Bubu Benjamin G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Mohamed Binzagr, Jalen Rougier-Roane, Amir Arrington, Ty Bevins, Vincent Chaudhri, Trey Moss
| SLU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robbie Avila C | 30 | 22 | 3 | 4 | 7-9 | 3-5 |
| Dion Brown G | 28 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-1 |
| Trey Green G | 28 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 6-11 | 3-7 |
| Quentin Jones G | 23 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1-8 | 0-6 |
| Amari McCottry G | 16 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Ishan Sharma F | 30 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-6 |
| Kellen Thames G | 19 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-2 |
| Brady Dunlap F | 15 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| Paul Otieno F | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jax Kerr, Cam Hutson, Luke Laczkowski, Badara Diakite, Isaac Holmes, Jaden Schertz, Kalu Anya, Dylan Warlick
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketSLU -6.5
ModelSLU -4.1
Model edgeGW +2.4
L SLU covered
Total
Market158.5
Model163.0
Model edgeOver 4.5
W Over
Projected score
GW 79.4 · SLU 83.6
GW 81 · SLU 88
Win probability
SLU 64%
1st half
Spread
SLU -2.3
GW -14.0
Total
76.1
82 points
Projected score
GW 36.9 · SLU 39.2
GW 48 · SLU 34
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSLU -6.5
no move
CloseSLU -6.5
No change since the open
Total
Open160.5
▼ 2
Close158.5
Down 2 since the open
Moneyline
GW +245 · SLU -305
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SLU -6.5 · unchangedmodel SLU -4
model SLU -4
Opened 160.5 · closed 158.5 · moved 2 downmodel 163
model 163
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
GW 1–4 SLUSLU leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · GW 4-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2025-26 | GW 76 @ SLU 79 | SLU -10.5 | GW W |
| Jan 25, 2024-25 | SLU 61 @ GW 67 | GW -0.5 | GW W |
| Feb 24, 2023-24 | GW 91 @ SLU 96 | SLU -6.5 | GW W |
| Jan 14, 2022-23 | SLU 81 @ GW 74 | GW +2.5 | SLU W |
| Jan 26, 2021-22 | GW 67 @ SLU 80 | SLU -17.5 | GW W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
G Washington
31 games played
Straight up
17-14
55% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 67-47 | -20.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 99-95 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 107-67 | -17.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 96-73 | -15.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 89-52 | -22.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 86-92 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 92-79 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 95-96 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 84-70 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 99-86 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 174.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 58-70 | -21.5 | L −33.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-80 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 99-85 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 162.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-55 | -16.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 72-79 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 101-66 | -14.5 | W +20.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 79-84 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 64-69 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-69 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 76-79 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 167.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-79 | -11.5 | L −25.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 73-76 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 86-88 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 75-70 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 72-53 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 75-89 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 104-77 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 66-68 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 91-82 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 62-68 | -9.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 66-62 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
ME
W 67-47
−0.5
8
vs
USF
W 99-95
+5.5
12
vs
AMER
W 107-67
+22.5
15
vs
ODU
W 96-73
+7.5
19
vs
UMBC
W 89-52
+14.5
23
vs
MCN
L 86-92
−11.5
24
vs
MTSU
W 92-79
+3.5
25
vs
MUR
L 95-96
−8.5
2
@
ARMY
W 84-70
−5.5
6
vs
W&M
W 99-86
−0.5
10
vs
DEL
L 58-70
−33.5
13
vs
FLA
L 70-80
+4.5
31
@
RICH
W 99-85
+11.5
3
vs
LAS
W 77-55
+5.5
6
@
DAY
L 72-79
−4.5
10
vs
LUC
W 101-66
+20.5
14
vs
DAV
L 79-84
−14.5
19
@
GMU
L 64-69
−3.5
24
vs
RICH
W 85-69
+5.5
27
@
SLU
L 76-79
+7.5
31
vs
FOR
L 65-79
−25.5
4
@
JOES
L 73-76
−4.5
7
@
DUQ
L 86-88
−3.5
10
vs
URI
W 75-70
−0.5
13
vs
GMU
W 72-53
+15.5
17
@
VCU
L 75-89
−7.5
24
@
LAS
W 104-77
+18.5
27
vs
DAY
L 66-68
−4.5
4
vs
SBU
W 91-82
+1.5
7
@
LUC
L 62-68
−15.5
12
vs
FOR
W 66-62
−3.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
ME
W 67-47
−29.5
8
vs
USF
W 99-95
+34.5
12
vs
AMER
W 107-67
+22.5
15
vs
ODU
W 96-73
+13.5
19
vs
UMBC
W 89-52
−19.5
23
vs
MCN
L 86-92
+20.5
24
vs
MTSU
W 92-79
+12.5
25
vs
MUR
L 95-96
+23.5
2
@
ARMY
W 84-70
−2.5
6
vs
W&M
W 99-86
+10.5
10
vs
DEL
L 58-70
−24.5
13
vs
FLA
L 70-80
−12.5
31
@
RICH
W 99-85
+21.5
3
vs
LAS
W 77-55
−18.5
6
@
DAY
L 72-79
−3.5
10
vs
LUC
W 101-66
+12.5
14
vs
DAV
L 79-84
+12.5
19
@
GMU
L 64-69
−20.5
24
vs
RICH
W 85-69
−5.5
27
@
SLU
L 76-79
−12.5
31
vs
FOR
L 65-79
−6.5
4
@
JOES
L 73-76
−6.5
7
@
DUQ
L 86-88
+15.5
10
vs
URI
W 75-70
−6.5
13
vs
GMU
W 72-53
−24.5
17
@
VCU
L 75-89
+2.5
24
@
LAS
W 104-77
+34.5
27
vs
DAY
L 66-68
−18.5
4
vs
SBU
W 91-82
+15.5
7
@
LUC
L 62-68
−18.5
12
vs
FOR
W 66-62
−16.5
over 14under 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Saint Louis
30 games played
Straight up
26-4
87% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-67 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 108-86 | -30.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 109-66 | -24.5 | W +18.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 78-64 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 167.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 91-60 | -19.5 | W +11.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 71-70 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 77-78 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 91-70 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 107-65 | -24.5 | W +17.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-75 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 112-53 | -26.5 | W +32.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 93-79 | -34.5 | L −20.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 102-79 | -19.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 71-62 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-72 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 78-56 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 88-63 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 97-62 | -8.5 | W +26.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 79-76 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 102-71 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 91-82 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-58 | -22.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 86-59 | -17.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 76-81 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 88-75 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 62-77 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-76 | -13.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 79-65 | -21.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 57-86 | -7.5 | L −36.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SEMO
W 92-67
+5.5
6
vs
CHST
W 108-86
−8.5
10
vs
LIN
W 109-66
+18.5
15
vs
GCU
W 78-64
+5.5
21
vs
PFW
W 91-60
+11.5
27
vs
SCU
W 71-70
−0.5
28
vs
STAN
L 77-78
−2.5
2
@
LMU
W 91-70
+13.5
7
vs
CMU
W 107-65
+17.5
13
vs
SF
W 85-75
−2.5
17
vs
BCU
W 112-53
+32.5
21
vs
UNH
W 93-79
−20.5
31
vs
JOES
W 102-79
+3.5
7
@
VCU
W 71-62
+10.5
10
@
LAS
W 84-72
−5.5
14
vs
FOR
W 78-56
+4.5
17
vs
RICH
W 88-63
+10.5
20
@
DUQ
W 81-77
−4.5
23
@
SBU
W 97-62
+26.5
27
vs
GW
W 79-76
−7.5
30
vs
DAY
W 102-71
+21.5
3
@
DAV
W 91-82
+0.5
7
vs
LAS
W 82-58
+1.5
13
@
LUC
W 86-59
+9.5
17
@
URI
L 76-81
−14.5
20
vs
VCU
W 88-75
+5.5
24
@
DAY
L 62-77
−18.5
28
vs
DUQ
W 91-76
+1.5
4
vs
LUC
W 79-65
−7.5
7
@
GMU
L 57-86
−36.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SEMO
W 92-67
+5.5
6
vs
CHST
W 108-86
+38.5
10
vs
LIN
W 109-66
+9.5
15
vs
GCU
W 78-64
−25.5
21
vs
PFW
W 91-60
−15.5
27
vs
SCU
W 71-70
−17.5
28
vs
STAN
L 77-78
−5.5
2
@
LMU
W 91-70
+10.5
7
vs
CMU
W 107-65
+11.5
13
vs
SF
W 85-75
+4.5
17
vs
BCU
W 112-53
+7.5
21
vs
UNH
W 93-79
+14.5
31
vs
JOES
W 102-79
+19.5
7
@
VCU
W 71-62
−38.5
10
@
LAS
W 84-72
+3.5
14
vs
FOR
W 78-56
−20.5
17
vs
RICH
W 88-63
−11.5
20
@
DUQ
W 81-77
−7.5
23
@
SBU
W 97-62
−0.5
27
vs
GW
W 79-76
−12.5
30
vs
DAY
W 102-71
+21.5
3
@
DAV
W 91-82
+21.5
7
vs
LAS
W 82-58
−13.5
13
@
LUC
W 86-59
−10.5
17
@
URI
L 76-81
+5.5
20
vs
VCU
W 88-75
−1.5
24
@
DAY
L 62-77
−18.5
28
vs
DUQ
W 91-76
+6.5
4
vs
LUC
W 79-65
−11.5
7
@
GMU
L 57-86
−3.5
over 14under 16avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
G Washington
17-14 overall · 9-10 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Fordham66–62
- L@ Loyola Chicago62–68
- Wvs St Bonaventure91–82
- Lvs Dayton66–68
- W@ La Salle104–77
1 day since their last game.
Saint Louis
26-4 overall · 15-3 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ George Mason57–86
- Wvs Loyola Chicago79–65
- Wvs Duquesne91–76
- L@ Dayton62–77
- Wvs VCU88–75
6 days since their last game.