The Dedmon Center · at Radford · Conference game
Closing line
WIN -4.5✓ RAD covered by 2.5
Closing total161.5Under by 3.5
| This season | RAD | |
|---|---|---|
| 13-8 | Record | 10-11 |
| 11-10 | ATS | 9-12 |
| 10-11 | O/U | 13-8 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: WIN 84–81 RAD · ✓ WIN (62%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WIN | 42 | 38 | 80 |
| RAD | 36 | 42 | 78 |
1st half: WIN 42, RAD 36 (WIN by 6). The model had WIN by 2.1 and a total of 76.9 (actual 78).
Team stats
| WIN | RAD | |
|---|---|---|
| 29-60 48% | Field goals | 28-66 42% |
| 8-27 30% | 3-pointers | 9-30 30% |
| 14-21 67% | Free throws | 13-17 76% |
| 35 9 off | Rebounds | 41 15 off |
| 18 | Assists | 12 |
| 9 | Steals | 7 |
| 1 | Blocks | 0 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 17 | Fouls | 18 |
| 38 | Points in paint | 32 |
| 13 | Fast-break points | 15 |
Players
| WIN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kody Clouet G | 36 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 6-12 | 3-8 |
| Logan Duncomb C | 32 | 18 | 12 | 5 | 7-9 | 0-0 |
| Isaiah Wilson G | 26 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| Kareem Rozier G | 26 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 2-7 |
| Tommy Kamarad F | 14 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Josh Meo G | 26 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-5 |
| Seifeldin Hendawy G | 19 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3-4 | 0-1 |
| Pharrell Boyogueno G | 12 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 |
| Ed Nnamoko F | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Tai Hamilton, Henry Harrison, Cam Christy, Braylhan Thomas, Daylen Berry, Kaleb Evans
| RAD | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaylon Johnson G | 35 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 3-9 | 1-6 |
| Del Jones G | 34 | 21 | 6 | 4 | 7-21 | 2-9 |
| Tyson Brown F | 31 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Dennis Parker Jr. G | 24 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 7-13 | 3-6 |
| Lukas Walls G | 21 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Mari Jordan G | 17 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-1 |
| Louie Jordan F | 17 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-3 |
| Brennan Rigsby Jr. G | 16 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Frederik Erichsen F | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Zion Walker, Bradley Land, Gabriel Ferreira, Warren Keel Jr., Diogo Alves
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketWIN -4.5
ModelWIN -3.4
Model edgeRAD +1.1
W RAD covered
Total
Market161.5
Model164.3
Model edgeOver 2.8
L Under
Projected score
WIN 83.8 · RAD 80.5
WIN 80 · RAD 78
Win probability
WIN 62%
1st half
Spread
WIN -2.1
WIN -6.0
Total
76.9
78 points
Projected score
WIN 39.5 · RAD 37.4
WIN 42 · RAD 36
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenWIN -3.5
1 → WIN
CloseWIN -4.5
1 pt toward WIN
Total
Open160.5
▲ 1
Close161.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
WIN -185 · RAD +154
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened WIN -3.5 · closed WIN -4.5 · moved 1 toward WINmodel WIN -3.5
model WIN -3.5
Opened 160.5 · closed 161.5 · moved 1 upmodel 164.5
model 164.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
WIN 5–4 RADWIN leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · WIN has won the last 2 meetings · WIN 4-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2025-26 | RAD 75 @ WIN 76 | WIN -9.5 | RAD W |
| Feb 12, 2024-25 | RAD 74 @ WIN 78 | WIN -3.5 | WIN W |
| Jan 4, 2024-25 | WIN 67 @ RAD 87 | RAD +1.5 | RAD W |
| Feb 15, 2023-24 | WIN 85 @ RAD 69 | RAD -1.5 | WIN W |
| Jan 13, 2023-24 | RAD 88 @ WIN 92 | WIN -4.5 | RAD W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Winthrop
21 games played
Straight up
13-8
62% wins
Against the spread
11-10
52% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-11
48% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 81-74 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 90-96 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 66-72 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 105-69 | -2.5 | W +33.5 | 162.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 83-84 | +23.5 | W +22.5 | 168.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 80-62 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 73-80 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 101-79 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 94-92 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 84-88 | -16.5 | L −20.5 | 153.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 88-90 | -12.5 | L −14.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 57-87 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 70-82 | -7.5 | L −19.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-77 | -23.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 166.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 71-50 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 92-75 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 162.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 69-67 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 76-75 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 82-72 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 84-71 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
QUC
W 81-74
+3.5
7
@
GMU
L 90-96
+3.5
11
@
CCU
L 66-72
−8.5
15
vs
MER
W 105-69
+33.5
18
@
ARK
L 83-84
+22.5
23
@
JKST
W 80-62
+7.5
25
@
NEB
L 73-80
+7.5
29
vs
SCST
W 101-79
+1.5
2
@
LIU
W 94-92
−3.5
6
vs
CCU
L 84-88
−20.5
18
@
UND
L 88-90
−14.5
28
@
TTU
L 57-87
−12.5
31
@
LONG
L 70-82
−19.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 88-77
−12.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 81-77
−4.5
10
@
UPST
W 71-50
+15.5
14
vs
HPU
W 92-75
+19.5
17
@
UNCA
W 69-67
−3.5
21
vs
RAD
W 76-75
−8.5
24
@
PRES
W 82-72
+4.5
31
vs
UNCA
W 84-71
+3.5
covered 11didn’t cover 10avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
QUC
W 81-74
−8.5
7
@
GMU
L 90-96
+39.5
11
@
CCU
L 66-72
−27.5
15
vs
MER
W 105-69
+11.5
18
@
ARK
L 83-84
−1.5
23
@
JKST
W 80-62
−21.5
25
@
NEB
L 73-80
−13.5
29
vs
SCST
W 101-79
+22.5
2
@
LIU
W 94-92
+32.5
6
vs
CCU
L 84-88
+18.5
18
@
UND
L 88-90
+20.5
28
@
TTU
L 57-87
−19.5
31
@
LONG
L 70-82
−9.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 88-77
+0.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 81-77
−8.5
10
@
UPST
W 71-50
−36.5
14
vs
HPU
W 92-75
+4.5
17
@
UNCA
W 69-67
−16.5
21
vs
RAD
W 76-75
−14.5
24
@
PRES
W 82-72
+7.5
31
vs
UNCA
W 84-71
+7.5
over 10under 11avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Radford
21 games played
Straight up
10-11
48% wins
Against the spread
9-12
43% covers · avg −2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-8
62% overs · avg +3.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-75 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 74-89 | +20.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 59-92 | -6.5 | L −39.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 82-87 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 58-87 | +10.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 73-81 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 72-89 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 75-82 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 89-56 | -13.5 | W +19.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 107-77 | -20.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 83-96 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 170.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 97-90 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 76-69 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 80-61 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-91 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 89-80 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 85-83 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 75-76 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 83-93 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 84-75 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 93-84 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 177 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WIU
W 80-75
−11.5
11
@
UNC
L 74-89
+5.5
15
vs
WRST
L 59-92
−39.5
16
vs
CLE
L 82-87
−13.5
18
@
SC
L 58-87
−18.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 73-81
−3.5
24
@
SMU
L 72-89
+6.5
3
vs
USM
L 75-82
−10.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 89-56
+19.5
14
vs
COPP
W 107-77
+9.5
18
@
W&M
L 83-96
−4.5
21
vs
VMI
W 97-90
−4.5
31
@
UPST
W 76-69
+8.5
7
vs
PRES
W 80-61
+12.5
10
vs
UNCA
L 72-91
−23.5
14
@
GWEB
W 89-80
−4.5
17
vs
LONG
W 85-83
−2.5
21
@
WIN
L 75-76
+8.5
23
vs
HPU
L 83-93
−2.5
29
@
CHSO
W 84-75
+7.5
31
@
PRES
W 93-84
+10.5
covered 9didn’t cover 12avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WIU
W 80-75
+3.5
11
@
UNC
L 74-89
+0.5
15
vs
WRST
L 59-92
−5.5
16
vs
CLE
L 82-87
+6.5
18
@
SC
L 58-87
−8.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 73-81
+2.5
24
@
SMU
L 72-89
−4.5
3
vs
USM
L 75-82
+4.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 89-56
−9.5
14
vs
COPP
W 107-77
+29.5
18
@
W&M
L 83-96
+8.5
21
vs
VMI
W 97-90
+28.5
31
@
UPST
W 76-69
−13.5
7
vs
PRES
W 80-61
−6.5
10
vs
UNCA
L 72-91
+11.5
14
@
GWEB
W 89-80
+3.5
17
vs
LONG
W 85-83
+10.5
21
@
WIN
L 75-76
−14.5
23
vs
HPU
L 83-93
+10.5
29
@
CHSO
W 84-75
−3.5
31
@
PRES
W 93-84
+25.5
over 13under 8avg +3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Winthrop
13-8 overall · 8-1 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs UNC Asheville84–71
- W@ Presbyterian82–72
- Wvs Radford76–75
- W@ UNC Asheville69–67
- Wvs High Point92–75
4 days since their last game.
Radford
10-11 overall · 6-3 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Presbyterian93–84
- W@ Charleston So84–75
- Lvs High Point83–93
- L@ Winthrop75–76
- Wvs Longwood85–83
4 days since their last game.