Delta Center · at Jazz
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 1-5 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 1-5 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UTAH 123–118 · win probability UTAH 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 241.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
CHI 4, UTAH 4 · 2026-27 so far
CHI offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 12th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
UTAH offense vs CHI defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
CHI has played the 14th-hardest schedule, UTAH the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: CHI 48.2 and allows 56.0; UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CHI 16.2%, UTAH 17.0%. Forced: CHI 14.7%, UTAH 13.3%
Recent form
Last 5: CHI 3-2 ATS, margin -10.4; UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2
Free throws
Free throw rate: CHI 38.3, UTAH 31.6. Allowed: CHI 33.5, UTAH 33.8
Context
Tempo
About 107 possessions: CHI plays 109.8 a game (1st fastest), UTAH 104.0 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
CHI hits 28.1% and allows 39.3%; UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 47.9% and 41.7% of their shots
Home court
UTAH at home. This season: UTAH 1-4 at home, CHI 1-3 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CHI 29.2%, UTAH 25.7%. Defensive: CHI 69.8%, UTAH 77.1%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CHI 100%, UTAH 100%. Transfers in: CHI 0, UTAH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelUTAH -4.6
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model241.2
Model edge—
Projected score
CHI 118.3 · UTAH 122.9
Win probability
UTAH 63%
1st half
Spread
UTAH -2.4
Total
120.3
Projected score
CHI 59 · UTAH 61.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% | |
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
CHI 7–3 UTAHCHI leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · CHI 5-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2025-26 | UTAH 126 @ CHI 128 | CHI -5.5 | UTAH W |
| Nov 16, 2025-26 | CHI 147 @ UTAH 150 | UTAH +4.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 17, 2024-25 | CHI 111 @ UTAH 97 | UTAH +4.5 | CHI W |
| Nov 4, 2024-25 | UTAH 135 @ CHI 126 | CHI +7.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 6, 2023-24 | CHI 119 @ UTAH 117 | UTAH +4.5 | UTAH W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bulls
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−32.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+8.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−5.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−20.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+1.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
+0.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−10.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+15.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−0.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−0.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+26.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
−0.5
over 2under 4avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Bulls 2, Jazz 2, even 1
BullsBetterJazz
G N. Powell20.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 71
←CHIBig
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
G J. Giddey8.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 29
←CHISmall
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
F C. Wilson21.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 6
=Even
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
F M. Buzelis14.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 4
→UTAHBig
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
F P. Williams7 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 19
→UTAHSmall
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
BullsBetterJazz
CHI offense12th of 30 · +1.2
←CHIBig
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
CHI defense30th of 30 · -9.4
→UTAHSmall
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
Backcourt+5.1 · 2 players
←CHIBig
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt-24.0 · 3 players
→UTAHBig
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
Bench-6.9 · 5 players
→UTAHBig
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCHI betterUTAH betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
N. Powell30 minJ. Giddey27 minT. Jones18 minB. Hield14 minJ. Hawkins14 minD. Swain12 min
Forwards
C. Wilson34 minM. Buzelis25 minP. Williams21 minL. Miller19 minZ. Collins18 minI. Okoro18 min
Out
J. SmithDay-To-DayT. AwakaDay-To-Day
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 113.5 #16 | Points per game | 108.7 #24 |
| 1.04 #26 | Points per possession | 1.05 #25 |
| 109.8 #1 | Pace (possessions) | 104.0 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.2 #30 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #24 |
| 28.1 #30 | 3-point % | 32.6 #23 |
| 47.9 #4 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.7 #21 |
| 38.3 #1 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #10 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #20 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #25 |
| 29.2 #9 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.7 #22 |
| 24.3 #25 | Assists per game | 26.2 #19 |
| Defense | ||
| 129.3 #30 | Points allowed | 118.8 #25 |
| 1.17 #27 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #25 |
| 56.0 #26 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #18 |
| 39.3 #28 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #25 |
| 14.7 #21 | Turnovers forced | 13.3 #28 |
| 69.8 #24 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.1 #4 |
| 8.7 #17 | Steals per game | 6.2 #29 |
| 5.0 #12 | Blocks per game | 6.5 #5 |
Bulls
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Celtics111–125
- Lvs Knicks127–133
- L@ Celtics99–134
- Lvs Wizards120–124
- W@ Bucks132–125
A week or more of rest.
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.