Golden 1 Center · at Kings · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-1 | Record | 0-6 |
| 3-2 | ATS | 1-5 |
| 2-3 | O/U | 5-1 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects POR 124–110 · win probability POR 84%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 233.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: POR has more of the edges
POR 8, SAC 1 · 2026-27 so far
Shooting
Effective FG%: POR 56.2 and allows 51.3; SAC 51.0 and allows 60.4
POR offense vs SAC defense
Offense 10th of 30 against a defense 29th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
POR has played the 27th-hardest schedule, SAC the 8th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
POR hits 35.3% and allows 32.1%; SAC hits 30.4% and allows 39.2%. Threes are 51.5% and 38.0% of their shots
SAC offense vs POR defense
Offense 27th of 30 against a defense 11th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: POR 35.9, SAC 26.4. Allowed: POR 27.8, SAC 31.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: POR 27.6%, SAC 22.9%. Defensive: POR 77.3%, SAC 73.7%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: POR 14.6%, SAC 15.9%. Forced: POR 14.8%, SAC 14.6%
Recent form
Last 5: POR 3-2 ATS, margin +11.4; SAC 1-4 ATS, margin -17.8
Home court
SAC at home. This season: SAC 0-2 at home, POR 3-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 105 possessions: POR plays 103.5 a game (14th fastest), SAC 106.0 (6th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: POR 100%, SAC 100%. Transfers in: POR 0, SAC 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelPOR -14.0
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model233.0
Model edge—
Projected score
POR 123.5 · SAC 109.5
Win probability
POR 84%
1st half
Spread
POR -8.1
Total
116.5
Projected score
POR 62.3 · SAC 54.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-1 80% | 3-2 60% | 2-3 40% | |
| 0-6 0% | 1-5 17% | 5-1 83% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 19 since 2021-22
POR 10–9 SACPOR leads · 19 games since 2021-22 · POR has won the last 5 meetings · POR 8-11 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026-27 | POR 128 @ SAC 120 | SAC +9.5 | SAC W |
| Apr 12, 2025-26 | SAC 110 @ POR 122 | POR -18.5 | SAC W |
| Jan 18, 2025-26 | POR 117 @ SAC 110 | SAC +1.5 | POR W |
| Dec 20, 2025-26 | POR 98 @ SAC 93 | SAC +4.5 | POR W |
| Dec 18, 2025-26 | SAC 133 @ POR 134 | POR -8.5 | SAC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Trail Blazers
5 games played
Straight up
4-1
80% wins
Against the spread
3-2
60% covers · avg +6.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-3
40% overs · avg −3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
PHX
W 124-83
+37.5
23
@
SAC
W 128-120
−1.5
27
@
LAL
W 136-129
+8.5
29
vs
MEM
L 103-124
−28.5
31
@
UTAH
W 112-90
+15.5
covered 3didn’t cover 2avg +6.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
PHX
W 124-83
−25.5
23
@
SAC
W 128-120
+16.5
27
@
LAL
W 136-129
+30.5
29
vs
MEM
L 103-124
−6.5
31
@
UTAH
W 112-90
−30.5
over 2under 3avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kings
6 games played
Straight up
0-6
0% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −10.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +6.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
LAC
L 96-121
−19.5
23
vs
POR
L 120-128
+1.5
25
vs
MEM
L 112-123
−7.5
27
@
SA
L 103-130
−7.5
29
@
NO
L 120-132
−5.5
31
@
MEM
L 105-136
−23.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −10.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
LAC
L 96-121
−9.5
23
vs
POR
L 120-128
+16.5
25
vs
MEM
L 112-123
+0.5
27
@
SA
L 103-130
+0.5
29
@
NO
L 120-132
+17.5
31
@
MEM
L 105-136
+11.5
over 5under 1avg +6.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Trail Blazers has the better starters
Position by position: Trail Blazers 4, Kings 0, even 1
Trail BlazersBetterKings
G D. Lillard19.2 pts · 4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 89
←PORBig
G D. Acuff26.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 4
G S. Henderson8.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 34
=Even
F D. Sabonis16 pts · 15.8 reb · 7.3 ast
Score 26
F D. Avdija23 pts · 6.8 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 82
←PORBig
F D. Hunter14 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 38
F T. Camara15.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 44
←PORBig
F P. Achiuwa12.5 pts · 6 reb · 1 ast
Score 7
C D. Clingan8.6 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 74
←PORBig
F L. Black7.1 pts · 5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 13
Trail BlazersBetterKings
POR offense10th of 30 · +1.4
←PORBig
SAC defense29th of 30 · -7.9
POR defense11th of 30 · +1.8
←PORBig
SAC offense27th of 30 · -3.0
Backcourt+11.6 · 2 players
←PORBig
Backcourt-13.7 · 1 player
Frontcourt+16.7 · 3 players
←PORBig
Frontcourt-18.6 · 4 players
Bench+15.6 · 5 players
←PORBig
Bench-13.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestPOR betterSAC betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Lillard29 minS. Henderson21 minJ. Holiday25 minS. Cissoko22 minV. Krejci11 minC. Youngblood6 min
Forwards
D. Avdija31 minT. Camara26 minJ. Tonje8 min
Centers
D. Clingan22 minM. Potter19 minR. Williams17 minB. Carlson12 minY. Hansen10 min
Out
J. MorantOut
Guards
D. Acuff37 minE. Sharp18 minD. Plowden14 minM. Monk12 minN. Clifford8 minA. FlaglerNew
Forwards
D. Sabonis37 minD. Hunter29 minP. Achiuwa29 minL. Black29 minJ. Mogbo17 minA. Karaban10 min
Out
Z. LaVineDay-To-DayK. MurrayOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 120.6 #4 | Points per game | 109.3 #22 |
| 1.16 #5 | Points per possession | 1.03 #28 |
| 103.5 #14 | Pace (possessions) | 106.0 #6 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.2 #4 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #23 |
| 35.3 #12 | 3-point % | 30.4 #27 |
| 51.5 #1 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.0 #27 |
| 35.9 #3 | Free throw rate | 26.4 #20 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.6 #9 | Turnover rate | 15.9 #19 |
| 27.6 #14 | Offensive rebound rate | 22.9 #28 |
| 26.2 #17 | Assists per game | 24.5 #23 |
| Defense | ||
| 109.2 #10 | Points allowed | 128.3 #29 |
| 1.06 #10 | Points allowed per possession | 1.21 #29 |
| 51.3 #8 | Opponent effective FG% | 60.4 #30 |
| 32.1 #8 | Opponent 3-point % | 39.2 #27 |
| 14.8 #20 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #22 |
| 77.3 #3 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.7 #12 |
| 8.6 #18 | Steals per game | 8.0 #21 |
| 4.2 #21 | Blocks per game | 2.3 #30 |
Trail Blazers
4-1 overall · 4-1 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Jazz112–90
- Lvs Grizzlies103–124
- W@ Lakers136–129
- W@ Kings128–120
- Wvs Suns124–83
A week or more of rest.
Kings
0-6 overall · 0-6 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Grizzlies105–136
- L@ Pelicans120–132
- L@ Spurs103–130
- Lvs Grizzlies112–123
- Lvs Trail Blazers120–128
A week or more of rest.