No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
33–42
✓ MRSH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 57.8
Projected
26–32
✓ APP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
32–40
✓ LIP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
35–37
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
37–35
✓ CARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
36–34
✓ UVM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
32–36
✓ UMBC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
31–35
✗ UNH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.2
Projected
32–31
✓ UALB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
32–36
✓ YSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.7
Projected
40–39
✓ USF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
39–36
✓ WIS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
33–34
✗ IONA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
36–37
✓ RMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
36–34
✓ QUIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
30–36
✓ FAIR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
31–37
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.9
Projected
30–31
✗ SIE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
36–37
✓ W&M won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
36–38
✗ COFC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
34–35
✗ ELON lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
32–33
✓ HAMP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
37–32
✓ HOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
34–36
✗ NE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
33–34
✓ JMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
34–34
✓ USM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.4
Projected
42–40
✓ ARST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
33–34
✓ CCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.6
Projected
41–38
✓ EKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
33–35
✗ JAX lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
31–36
✓ MORE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
35–36
✗ ORU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
32–36
✓ SEMO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
33–38
✓ LIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
31–32
✓ USI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
✓ STMN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.2
Projected
39–36
✓ NDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
36–40
✓ UCSB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
36–35
✗ UCSD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
36–38
✗ MONT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
32–36
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
34–39
✓ IDHO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
37–36
✓ PRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
34–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
31–36
✗ NMSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
36–35
✗ FIU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
37–38
✓ CSUF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
35–31
✓ UCI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
29–39
✓ HAW won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 1-16 · #358 11-7 · #231 |
— | — | MRSH -9.3 | — | 75.1 | — | 84% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 5-15 · #221 9-9 · #259 |
— | — | APP -5.3 | — | 57.8 | — | 72% APP | › | |
| Half final | 5-12 · #303 10-7 · #214 |
— | — | LIP -8.3 | — | 72.0 | — | 82% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 6-11 · #266 9-6 · #210 |
— | — | APSU -1.9 | — | 71.5 | — | 58% APSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-10 · #240 7-9 · #298 |
— | — | CARK -1.4 | — | 72.3 | — | 56% CARK | › | |
| Half final | 9-8 · #186 5-11 · #307 |
— | — | UVM -1.9 | — | 70.6 | — | 58% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 8-11 · #316 8-7 · #264 |
— | — | UMBC -4.1 | — | 68.0 | — | 67% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 1-16 · #272 3-12 · #286 |
— | — | UNH -4.2 | — | 65.8 | — | 68% UNH | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #301 2-17 · #323 |
— | — | UALB -0.9 | — | 62.2 | — | 54% UALB | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #226 6-11 · #265 |
— | — | YSU -3.6 | — | 67.5 | — | 65% YSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #84 11-7 · #102 |
— | — | USF -1.0 | — | 79.7 | — | 54% USF | › | |
| Half final | 13-5 · #41 9-9 · #78 |
— | — | WIS -3.4 | — | 75.0 | — | 64% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #225 12-8 · #233 |
— | — | IONA -0.7 | — | 66.8 | — | 53% IONA | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #235 10-8 · #168 |
— | — | RMU -1.4 | — | 72.4 | — | 56% RMU | › | |
| Half final | 12-7 · #241 7-12 · #278 |
— | — | QUIN -2.3 | — | 69.7 | — | 60% QUIN | › | |
| Half final | 4-13 · #346 10-9 · #239 |
— | — | FAIR -6.2 | — | 66.2 | — | 75% FAIR | › | |
| Half final | 7-11 · #359 6-13 · #311 |
— | — | SHU -6.0 | — | 67.4 | — | 74% SHU | › | |
| Half final | 11-6 · #236 13-7 · #260 |
— | — | SIE -0.1 | — | 60.9 | — | 50% SIE | › | |
| Half final | 15-2 · #120 10-6 · #217 |
— | — | W&M -0.5 | — | 72.5 | — | 52% W&M | › | |
| Half final | 7-10 · #243 10-8 · #117 |
— | — | COFC -2.0 | — | 74.5 | — | 59% COFC | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #165 10-7 · #232 |
— | — | ELON -0.6 | — | 68.5 | — | 52% ELON | › | |
| Half final | 8-10 · #155 7-10 · #159 |
— | — | HAMP -0.7 | — | 64.3 | — | 53% HAMP | › | |
| Half final | 11-6 · #166 5-10 · #275 |
— | — | HOF -4.6 | — | 68.8 | — | 69% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #191 6-12 · #229 |
— | — | NE -2.6 | — | 70.2 | — | 61% NE | › | |
| Half final | 11-6 · #228 8-10 · #158 |
— | — | JMU -0.7 | — | 67.4 | — | 53% JMU | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #224 5-12 · #208 |
— | — | USM -0.6 | — | 68.1 | — | 53% USM | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #171 11-7 · #296 |
— | — | ARST -2.0 | — | 81.4 | — | 59% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #103 10-9 · #283 |
— | — | CCU -0.9 | — | 66.5 | — | 54% CCU | › | |
| Half final | 5-12 · #294 1-16 · #333 |
— | — | EKU -3.1 | — | 78.6 | — | 63% EKU | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #295 5-12 · #223 |
— | — | JAX -1.7 | — | 67.9 | — | 57% JAX | › | |
| Half final | 1-15 · #365 6-10 · #350 |
— | — | MORE -4.8 | — | 66.8 | — | 70% MORE | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #336 2-15 · #305 |
— | — | ORU -0.8 | — | 71.4 | — | 53% ORU | › | |
| Half final | 7-10 · #222 7-10 · #306 |
— | — | SEMO -3.8 | — | 68.6 | — | 66% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #282 8-8 · #258 |
— | — | LIN -4.5 | — | 70.6 | — | 69% LIN | › | |
| Half final | 5-11 · #361 2-14 · #304 |
— | — | USI -1.1 | — | 63.5 | — | 55% USI | › | |
| Half final | 7-10 · #201 12-5 · #212 |
— | — | STMN -2.6 | — | 72.7 | — | 61% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 13-5 · #213 6-11 · #263 |
— | — | NDSU -3.0 | — | 75.2 | — | 63% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-12 · #164 9-7 · #134 |
— | — | UCSB -3.9 | — | 76.3 | — | 66% UCSB | › | |
| Half final | 12-5 · #123 9-7 · #182 |
— | — | UCSD -1.9 | — | 70.9 | — | 58% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 8-9 · #313 7-8 · #273 |
— | — | MONT -2.3 | — | 74.1 | — | 60% MONT | › | |
| Half final | 7-9 · #344 8-8 · #162 |
— | — | MTST -3.3 | — | 68.1 | — | 64% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 3-11 · #196 8-7 · #247 |
— | — | IDHO -4.9 | — | 73.7 | — | 70% IDHO | › | |
| Half final | 8-5 · #274 3-14 · #254 |
— | — | PRST -1.2 | — | 73.0 | — | 55% PRST | › | |
| Half final | 9-6 · #245 8-8 · #256 |
— | — | TNST -0.2 | — | 68.5 | — | 51% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #250 7-7 · #133 |
— | — | NMSU -4.6 | — | 67.0 | — | 69% NMSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-9 · #178 3-12 · #190 |
— | — | FIU -0.9 | — | 70.1 | — | 54% FIU | › | |
| Half final | 6-11 · #297 6-12 · #312 |
— | — | CSUF -1.6 | — | 75.1 | — | 57% CSUF | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #149 5-12 · #281 |
— | — | UCI -4.1 | — | 66.4 | — | 67% UCI | › | |
| Half final | 6-12 · #329 11-4 · #140 |
— | — | HAW -9.3 | — | 67.6 | — | 85% HAW | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record