Physical Education Complex · at Coppin St · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| 8-9 | Record | 2-19 |
| 9-8 | ATS | 8-13 |
| 6-11 | O/U | 15-6 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HOW 78–68 · win probability HOW 83%
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HOW has more of the edges
HOW 7, COPP 1 · 2025-26 so far
Three-pointers
HOW hits 35.8% and allows 31.4%; COPP hits 30.7% and allows 38.3%. Threes are 34.7% and 35.2% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: HOW 50.9 and allows 48.7; COPP 45.9 and allows 55.4
COPP offense vs HOW defense
Offense 351st of 366 against a defense 206th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HOW 35.8%, COPP 30.4%. Defensive: HOW 68.6%, COPP 65.3%
HOW offense vs COPP defense
Offense 196th of 366 against a defense 324th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: HOW 43.5, COPP 38.5. Allowed: HOW 38.4, COPP 42.9
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HOW 19.3%, COPP 22.3%. Forced: HOW 20.7%, COPP 17.6%
Home court
COPP at home. This season: COPP 0-3 at home, HOW 3-6 away
Context
Schedule so far
HOW has played the 348th-hardest schedule, COPP the 313th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HOW 76%, COPP 68%. Transfers in: HOW 2, COPP 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: HOW plays 69.5 a game (144th fastest), COPP 69.3 (159th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rest
HOW 2 days since its last game, COPP 2
Even
Recent form
Last 5: HOW 2-3 ATS, margin +5.2; COPP 2-3 ATS, margin -8.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HOW -10.8 | — |
| Total | — | 146.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | HOW 78.4 · COPP 67.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HOW -6.5 | — |
| 1H total | 68.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | HOW 37.5 · COPP 30.9 | — |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 1-9 10% | 4-6 40% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
HOW 5–4 COPPHOW leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · HOW 4-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2024-25 | HOW 61 @ COPP 72 | COPP +7.5 | COPP W |
| Jan 13, 2024-25 | COPP 75 @ HOW 90 | HOW -13.5 | HOW W |
| Feb 26, 2023-24 | COPP 69 @ HOW 78 | HOW -14.5 | COPP W |
| Jan 29, 2023-24 | HOW 81 @ COPP 66 | COPP +8.5 | HOW W |
| Feb 18, 2022-23 | HOW 80 @ COPP 70 | COPP +6.5 | HOW W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Howard
17 games played
Straight up
8-9
47% wins
Against the spread
9-8
53% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
6-11
35% overs · avg −5.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 67-88 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 70-73 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 72-64 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 60-64 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 56-93 | +43.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 75-79 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 73-69 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 61-57 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 74-66 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 67-66 | +15.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 60-80 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 57-58 | -8.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 57-69 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 84-58 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-69 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 77-78 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−0.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−7.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
+1.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−5.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+5.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
+6.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
−1.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
+6.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
+6.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+14.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
+16.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−0.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−9.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−14.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+17.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+11.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
−15.5
covered 9didn’t cover 8avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−9.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
−18.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−25.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+11.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
−5.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
+7.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
−7.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
−24.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+1.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
−8.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−8.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−29.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−4.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+12.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+10.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
+6.5
over 6under 11avg −5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Coppin St
21 games played
Straight up
2-19
10% wins
Against the spread
8-13
38% covers · avg −4.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-6
71% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 61-83 | +28.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 59-87 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 70-84 | +18.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 50-100 | +34.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 59-82 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 62-72 | +18.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | O 134 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 58-101 | +32.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 68-65 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 84-95 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 49-91 | +31.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 50-92 | +30.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 65-87 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 77-107 | +20.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 55-88 | +20.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 67-97 | +33.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 59-93 | +10.5 | L −23.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 53-51 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-88 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 72-74 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-70 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-103 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MD
L 61-83
+6.5
5
@
LAS
L 59-87
−10.5
9
@
JMU
L 70-84
+4.5
12
@
USF
L 50-100
−15.5
14
vs
CMU
L 59-82
−12.5
15
vs
USA
L 62-72
+8.5
22
@
VCU
L 58-101
−10.5
25
@
RID
W 68-65
+11.5
30
@
L-MD
L 84-95
−1.5
3
@
WVU
L 49-91
−10.5
6
@
LIB
L 50-92
−11.5
9
@
JOES
L 65-87
+0.5
14
@
RAD
L 77-107
−9.5
19
@
NAVY
L 55-88
−12.5
22
@
GTWN
L 67-97
+3.5
29
vs
UMBC
L 59-93
−23.5
3
@
DSU
W 53-51
+10.5
10
vs
NCCU
L 77-88
−4.5
12
vs
SCST
L 72-74
−3.5
17
@
UMES
L 67-70
+7.5
24
@
NORF
L 76-103
−13.5
covered 8didn’t cover 13avg −4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MD
L 61-83
+4.5
5
@
LAS
L 59-87
+6.5
9
@
JMU
L 70-84
+12.5
12
@
USF
L 50-100
−17.5
14
vs
CMU
L 59-82
−1.5
15
vs
USA
L 62-72
+0.5
22
@
VCU
L 58-101
+7.5
25
@
RID
W 68-65
−6.5
30
@
L-MD
L 84-95
+35.5
3
@
WVU
L 49-91
+5.5
6
@
LIB
L 50-92
−1.5
9
@
JOES
L 65-87
+5.5
14
@
RAD
L 77-107
+29.5
19
@
NAVY
L 55-88
−2.5
22
@
GTWN
L 67-97
+13.5
29
vs
UMBC
L 59-93
+3.5
3
@
DSU
W 53-51
−35.5
10
vs
NCCU
L 77-88
+21.5
12
vs
SCST
L 72-74
+5.5
17
@
UMES
L 67-70
+3.5
24
@
NORF
L 76-103
+35.5
over 15under 6avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Howard has the better starters
Position by position: Howard 3, Coppin St 0, even 2
HowardBetterCoppin St
G C. Gillus10.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 52
←HOWSmall
G H. Williams7.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
G C. Taylor17.2 pts · 6.4 reb · 3 ast
Score 89
←HOWBig
G C. Sparrow5.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 40
G A. Cotton8.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 15
=Even
G J. Piercy6.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 23
G O. Okojie10.3 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 61
←HOWBig
F N. Lamizana6.6 pts · 3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 18
C G. Kocevar TR3.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 31
=Even
F T. Koenig5.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 28
HowardBetterCoppin St
HOW offense196th of 366 · -6.1
←HOWBig
COPP defense324th of 366 · -8.4
HOW defense206th of 366 · -5.2
←HOWBig
COPP offense351st of 366 · -12.8
Backcourt-1.0 · 4 players
←HOWSmall
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
←HOWSmall
Frontcourt-2.6 · 2 players
Bench-3.1 · 5 players
←HOWBig
Bench-6.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestHOW betterCOPP betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Gillus34 minC. Taylor32 minA. Cotton27 minO. Okojie26 minI. Brown10 minJ. Johnson6 min
Forwards
C. Robins6 minJ. Johnson3 minJ. LawsonNewD. HarrisNew
Centers
G. Kocevar13 min · TRJ. Brown6 min · TR
Guards
H. Williams20 minC. Sparrow19 minJ. Piercy18 minB. Saunders16 minD. Lydner12 minJ. Brown5 min
Forwards
N. Lamizana19 minT. Koenig17 minT. Gapare16 min · TRE. TaylorNewL. LawalNewA. MyersNew
Centers
F. Aire9 min
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.5 #155 | Points per game | 64.3 #352 |
| 1.09 #162 | Points per possession | 0.93 #362 |
| 69.5 #144 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #159 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.9 #198 | Effective FG% | 45.9 #350 |
| 35.8 #68 | 3-point % | 30.7 #326 |
| 34.7 #283 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #273 |
| 43.5 #17 | Free throw rate | 38.5 #90 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.3 #331 | Turnover rate | 22.3 #363 |
| 35.8 #28 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.4 #183 |
| 15.2 #78 | Assists per game | 11.4 #317 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.3 #51 | Points allowed | 81.0 #334 |
| 1.00 #24 | Points allowed per possession | 1.17 #342 |
| 48.7 #53 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.4 #339 |
| 31.4 #41 | Opponent 3-point % | 38.3 #360 |
| 20.7 #13 | Turnovers forced | 17.6 #118 |
| 68.6 #223 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.3 #333 |
| 8.3 #29 | Steals per game | 6.0 #233 |
| 3.7 #113 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #143 |
Howard
8-9 overall · 2-3 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Morgan St77–78
- W@ NC Central83–69
- Wvs Delaware St84–58
- L@ MD Eastern57–69
- L@ SC State57–58
2 days since their last game.
Coppin St
2-19 overall · 1-4 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Norfolk St76–103
- L@ MD Eastern67–70
- Lvs SC State72–74
- Lvs NC Central77–88
- W@ Delaware St53–51
2 days since their last game.