Pete Hanna Center · at Samford · Conference game
Closing line
SAM -13.5✓ SAM covered by 0.5
Closing total146.5Under by 4.5
| This season | SAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 5-15 | Record | 9-12 |
| 10-10 | ATS | 11-10 |
| 9-11 | O/U | 13-8 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CIT 68–80 SAM · ✓ SAM (85%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIT | 32 | 32 | 64 |
| SAM | 39 | 39 | 78 |
1st half: CIT 32, SAM 39 (SAM by 7). The model had SAM by 7.0 and a total of 69.6 (actual 71).
Team stats
| CIT | SAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-61 43% | Field goals | 25-49 51% |
| 5-21 24% | 3-pointers | 10-22 45% |
| 7-15 47% | Free throws | 18-26 69% |
| 34 13 off | Rebounds | 33 8 off |
| 10 | Assists | 15 |
| 6 | Steals | 6 |
| 2 | Blocks | 3 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 20 | Fouls | 14 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 3 | Fast-break points | 8 |
Players
| CIT | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carter Kingsbury G | 33 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-1 |
| Sola Adebisi F | 31 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Eze Wali G | 27 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-2 |
| Braxton Williams F | 27 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4-10 | 0-2 |
| Christian Moore F | 21 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Logan Applegate G | 23 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 4-13 | 3-12 |
| Marcos Gonzales G | 17 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-2 |
| Keynan Davis G | 9 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2-2 | 1-1 |
| Simeon German F | 7 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Dante Kearse G | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Chase Williams, Cassius Bonjasky, Gabe Hernandez, Logan Menefee, Jameson Heck, Aidan Alexander, Jack Walter, Rowan Irelan
| SAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jadin Booth G | 36 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 5-9 | 3-4 |
| Keaton Norris G | 36 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 5-9 | 2-5 |
| Dylan Faulkner F | 30 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-0 |
| Isaiah Campbell-Finch G | 29 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-3 |
| Cade Norris G | 29 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Kam Martin G | 23 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 4-8 | 3-6 |
| Will Shaver C | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Zion Wilburn G | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
Did not play: DaJion Humphrey, Cooper Davenport, JD Gossett, Judson Bjornstad, Caleb Harrison, Corey Brown, Jaxon Pollard, Zach Lamey, Joshua Hughes
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketSAM -13.5
ModelSAM -11.9
Model edgeCIT +1.6
L SAM covered
Total
Market146.5
Model148.7
Model edgeOver 2.2
L Under
Projected score
CIT 68.4 · SAM 80.3
CIT 64 · SAM 78
Win probability
SAM 85%
1st half
Spread
SAM -7.0
SAM -7.0
Total
69.6
71 points
Projected score
CIT 31.3 · SAM 38.3
CIT 32 · SAM 39
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSAM -13.5
no move
CloseSAM -13.5
No change since the open
Total
Open142.5
▲ 4
Close146.5
Up 4 since the open
Moneyline
CIT +850 · SAM -1450
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SAM -13.5 · unchangedmodel SAM -12
model SAM -12
Opened 142.5 · closed 146.5 · moved 4 upmodel 148.5
model 148.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
CIT 1–7 SAMSAM leads · 8 games since 2021-22 · SAM has won the last 7 meetings · CIT 4-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | SAM 83 @ CIT 58 | CIT +16.5 | SAM W |
| Jan 1, 2024-25 | CIT 56 @ SAM 86 | SAM -20.5 | SAM W |
| Mar 2, 2023-24 | CIT 80 @ SAM 92 | SAM -13.5 | CIT W |
| Jan 6, 2023-24 | SAM 80 @ CIT 64 | CIT +8.5 | SAM W |
| Feb 11, 2022-23 | CIT 70 @ SAM 76 | SAM -14.5 | CIT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
The Citadel
20 games played
Straight up
5-15
25% wins
Against the spread
10-10
50% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-11
45% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 47-76 | +15.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 86-96 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 92-100 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | O 192 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 58-70 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 65-72 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 41-69 | +8.5 | L −19.5 | 133.5 | U 110 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 63-79 | +18.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 55-71 | +22.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 78-82 | +17.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 56-80 | +18.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 49-74 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 86-95 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 63-101 | +16.5 | L −21.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-77 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 66-69 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 82-68 | +6.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-75 | +11.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 55-84 | +17.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 80-56 | -2.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-66 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
BC
L 47-76
−13.5
10
vs
CHSO
L 86-96
−7.5
14
@
WGA
L 92-100
−1.5
24
vs
BELL
L 58-70
−8.5
26
vs
HCU
L 65-72
−5.5
30
vs
PRES
L 41-69
−19.5
4
@
DAV
L 63-79
+2.5
13
@
SC
L 55-71
+6.5
17
@
COFC
L 78-82
+13.5
20
@
RICH
L 56-80
−5.5
30
vs
ETSU
L 49-74
−12.5
3
vs
WOF
L 86-95
+0.5
7
@
MER
L 63-101
−21.5
10
vs
WCU
W 79-77
+8.5
15
@
UNCG
L 66-69
+6.5
17
@
VMI
W 82-68
+20.5
21
vs
FUR
W 77-75
+13.5
23
@
ETSU
L 55-84
−11.5
29
vs
VMI
W 80-56
+21.5
31
vs
UNCG
W 71-66
+7.5
covered 10didn’t cover 10avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
BC
L 47-76
−21.5
10
vs
CHSO
L 86-96
+36.5
14
@
WGA
L 92-100
+41.5
24
vs
BELL
L 58-70
−28.5
26
vs
HCU
L 65-72
−0.5
30
vs
PRES
L 41-69
−23.5
4
@
DAV
L 63-79
+4.5
13
@
SC
L 55-71
−15.5
17
@
COFC
L 78-82
+13.5
20
@
RICH
L 56-80
−10.5
30
vs
ETSU
L 49-74
−17.5
3
vs
WOF
L 86-95
+36.5
7
@
MER
L 63-101
+16.5
10
vs
WCU
W 79-77
+7.5
15
@
UNCG
L 66-69
−13.5
17
@
VMI
W 82-68
+6.5
21
vs
FUR
W 77-75
+9.5
23
@
ETSU
L 55-84
−2.5
29
vs
VMI
W 80-56
−6.5
31
vs
UNCG
W 71-66
−10.5
over 9under 11avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Samford
21 games played
Straight up
9-12
43% wins
Against the spread
11-10
52% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-8
62% overs · avg +2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 72-85 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 82-72 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 93-90 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 75-79 | +24.5 | W +20.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 84-77 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 62-77 | -5.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-81 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 78-63 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 45-89 | +7.5 | L −36.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 57-83 | +19.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 93-90 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 166.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 78-58 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 82-89 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-88 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-77 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 75-76 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 78-88 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 75-64 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 73-78 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 88-74 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TULN
L 72-85
−5.5
7
vs
SCST
W 82-72
−4.5
12
@
TXSO
W 93-90
+0.5
14
@
ARK
L 75-79
+20.5
16
@
CARK
W 84-77
+0.5
19
vs
FGCU
L 62-77
−20.5
21
@
NMSU
L 72-81
−0.5
25
vs
GAST
W 78-63
+9.5
26
vs
UVU
L 45-89
−36.5
5
@
VCU
L 57-83
−6.5
7
vs
COR
W 93-90
+0.5
1
@
VMI
W 78-58
+13.5
3
@
UNCG
L 82-89
−9.5
7
vs
WCU
W 82-77
+0.5
10
@
UTC
L 79-88
−7.5
14
vs
FUR
L 73-77
−2.5
17
vs
ETSU
L 75-76
+2.5
21
@
WOF
L 78-88
−6.5
24
vs
UTC
W 75-64
+6.5
29
@
FUR
L 73-78
+0.5
1
@
WCU
W 88-74
+12.5
covered 11didn’t cover 10avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TULN
L 72-85
+2.5
7
vs
SCST
W 82-72
−0.5
12
@
TXSO
W 93-90
+29.5
14
@
ARK
L 75-79
−4.5
16
@
CARK
W 84-77
+9.5
19
vs
FGCU
L 62-77
−15.5
21
@
NMSU
L 72-81
+7.5
25
vs
GAST
W 78-63
−5.5
26
vs
UVU
L 45-89
−14.5
5
@
VCU
L 57-83
−14.5
7
vs
COR
W 93-90
+16.5
1
@
VMI
W 78-58
−18.5
3
@
UNCG
L 82-89
+19.5
7
vs
WCU
W 82-77
+5.5
10
@
UTC
L 79-88
+18.5
14
vs
FUR
L 73-77
+0.5
17
vs
ETSU
L 75-76
+2.5
21
@
WOF
L 78-88
+11.5
24
vs
UTC
W 75-64
−13.5
29
@
FUR
L 73-78
+1.5
1
@
WCU
W 88-74
+7.5
over 13under 8avg +2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The Citadel
5-15 overall · 5-5 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs UNC Greensboro71–66
- Wvs VMI80–56
- L@ ETSU55–84
- Wvs Furman77–75
- W@ VMI82–68
5 days since their last game.
Samford
9-12 overall · 4-6 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ W Carolina88–74
- L@ Furman73–78
- Wvs Chattanooga75–64
- L@ Wofford78–88
- Lvs ETSU75–76
4 days since their last game.