Capital One Arena · at Wizards
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WSH | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 3-3 |
| 1-5 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 1-5 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WSH 119–115 · win probability WSH 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 233.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WSH has more of the edges
UTAH 1, WSH 5 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
UTAH has played the 4th-hardest schedule, WSH the 26th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UTAH 25.7%, WSH 20.9%. Defensive: UTAH 77.1%, WSH 68.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: UTAH 31.6, WSH 34.2. Allowed: UTAH 33.8, WSH 21.8
Shooting
Effective FG%: UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9; WSH 52.1 and allows 48.1
Three-pointers
UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%; WSH hits 29.3% and allows 28.7%. Threes are 41.7% and 37.6% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UTAH 17.0%, WSH 14.6%. Forced: UTAH 13.3%, WSH 13.3%
Home court
WSH at home. This season: WSH 2-1 at home, UTAH 0-1 away
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: UTAH plays 104.0 a game (12th fastest), WSH 102.3 (20th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Recent form
Last 5: UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2; WSH 2-3 ATS, margin -1.4
Even
UTAH offense vs WSH defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 23rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
WSH offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 25th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UTAH 100%, WSH 100%. Transfers in: UTAH 0, WSH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelWSH -4.0
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model233.7
Model edge—
Projected score
UTAH 114.8 · WSH 118.9
Win probability
WSH 61%
1st half
Spread
WSH -2.1
Total
116.9
Projected score
UTAH 57.4 · WSH 59.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | |
| 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | 1-5 17% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
UTAH 6–4 WSHUTAH leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · UTAH 7-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2025-26 | WSH 133 @ UTAH 110 | UTAH -3.5 | WSH W |
| Mar 5, 2025-26 | UTAH 122 @ WSH 112 | WSH -3.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 19, 2024-25 | WSH 112 @ UTAH 128 | UTAH -2.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 5, 2024-25 | UTAH 122 @ WSH 125 | WSH -5.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 4, 2023-24 | WSH 115 @ UTAH 127 | UTAH -4.5 | UTAH W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wizards
6 games played
Straight up
3-3
50% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +3.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
1-5
17% overs · avg −14 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
MIL
W 128-116
+7.5
23
vs
TOR
L 102-112
−0.5
24
@
CHI
W 124-120
+5.5
26
@
CHA
L 103-110
−4.5
28
@
CLE
L 111-121
−0.5
30
vs
CHA
W 95-79
+14.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
MIL
W 128-116
+4.5
23
vs
TOR
L 102-112
−22.5
24
@
CHI
W 124-120
−0.5
26
@
CHA
L 103-110
−12.5
28
@
CLE
L 111-121
−8.5
30
vs
CHA
W 95-79
−44.5
over 1under 5avg −14 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wizards has the better starters
Position by position: Jazz 1, Wizards 2, even 2
JazzBetterWizards
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
→WSHSmall
G T. Young20.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 10.2 ast
Score 23
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
=Even
G B. Coulibaly8.3 pts · 4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 4
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
→WSHBig
F A. Davis22.3 pts · 9.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 86
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
←UTAHBig
F K. George15.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 36
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
=No call
F A. Dybantsa18 pts · 5 reb · 1.5 ast
Not ranked
JazzBetterWizards
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
=Even
WSH defense23rd of 30 · -2.9
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
=Even
WSH offense25th of 30 · -2.5
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
→WSHBig
Backcourt-12.8 · 2 players
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
←UTAHBig
Frontcourt+11.5 · 3 players
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
←UTAHBig
Bench-14.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUTAH betterWSH betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Guards
T. Young36 minB. Coulibaly26 minW. Riley22 minT. Johnson21 minB. Carrington20 minT. Mann13 min
Forwards
A. Davis34 minK. George32 minA. Dybantsa29 minK. Middleton14 minF. Okpara1 min
Centers
D. Ayton14 min
Out
A. GillDay-To-DayJ. ChampagnieOutA. SarrDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 108.7 #24 | Points per game | 110.5 #20 |
| 1.05 #25 | Points per possession | 1.08 #19 |
| 104.0 #12 | Pace (possessions) | 102.3 #20 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #24 | Effective FG% | 52.1 #20 |
| 32.6 #23 | 3-point % | 29.3 #29 |
| 41.7 #21 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.6 #28 |
| 31.6 #10 | Free throw rate | 34.2 #5 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.0 #25 | Turnover rate | 14.6 #8 |
| 25.7 #22 | Offensive rebound rate | 20.9 #29 |
| 26.2 #19 | Assists per game | 24.5 #24 |
| Defense | ||
| 118.8 #25 | Points allowed | 109.7 #11 |
| 1.14 #25 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #11 |
| 53.9 #18 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.1 #1 |
| 37.6 #25 | Opponent 3-point % | 28.7 #1 |
| 13.3 #28 | Turnovers forced | 13.3 #27 |
| 77.1 #4 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.0 #28 |
| 6.2 #29 | Steals per game | 7.2 #24 |
| 6.5 #5 | Blocks per game | 5.3 #9 |
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.
Wizards
3-3 overall · 3-3 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Hornets95–79
- L@ Cavaliers111–121
- L@ Hornets103–110
- W@ Bulls124–120
- Lvs Raptors102–112
A week or more of rest.