Smoothie King Center · at Pelicans · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-6 | Record | 2-4 |
| 1-5 | ATS | 4-2 |
| 5-1 | O/U | 4-2 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NO 125–114 · win probability NO 78%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 238.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NO has more of the edges
SAC 0, NO 7 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
SAC has played the 8th-hardest schedule, NO the 28th. A record against a soft schedule means less
NO offense vs SAC defense
Offense 13th of 30 against a defense 29th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
SAC hits 30.4% and allows 39.2%; NO hits 31.2% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 38.0% and 32.8% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: SAC 51.0 and allows 60.4; NO 55.1 and allows 54.2
Free throws
Free throw rate: SAC 26.4, NO 35.3. Allowed: SAC 31.2, NO 30.6
Recent form
Last 5: SAC 1-4 ATS, margin -17.8; NO 4-1 ATS, margin +2.8
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SAC 22.9%, NO 24.3%. Defensive: SAC 73.7%, NO 76.4%
Home court
NO at home. This season: NO 2-2 at home, SAC 0-4 away
Even
SAC offense vs NO defense
Offense 27th of 30 against a defense 24th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SAC 15.9%, NO 17.4%. Forced: SAC 14.6%, NO 16.3%
Context
Tempo
About 107 possessions: SAC plays 106.0 a game (6th fastest), NO 108.0 (2nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SAC 100%, NO 100%. Transfers in: SAC 0, NO 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelNO -10.9
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model238.8
Model edge—
Projected score
SAC 113.9 · NO 124.9
Win probability
NO 78%
1st half
Spread
NO -6.0
Total
119.2
Projected score
SAC 56.6 · NO 62.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 0% | 1-5 17% | 5-1 83% | |
| 2-4 33% | 4-2 67% | 4-2 67% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 21 since 2021-22
SAC 8–13 NONO leads · 21 games since 2021-22 · SAC 6-15 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026-27 | SAC 120 @ NO 132 | NO -6.5 | NO W |
| Apr 3, 2025-26 | NO 113 @ SAC 117 | SAC +6.5 | SAC W |
| Mar 5, 2025-26 | NO 133 @ SAC 123 | SAC +6.5 | NO W |
| Feb 9, 2025-26 | SAC 94 @ NO 120 | NO -9.5 | NO W |
| Feb 13, 2024-25 | SAC 133 @ NO 140 | NO +7.5 | NO W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Kings
6 games played
Straight up
0-6
0% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −10.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +6.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
LAC
L 96-121
−19.5
23
vs
POR
L 120-128
+1.5
25
vs
MEM
L 112-123
−7.5
27
@
SA
L 103-130
−7.5
29
@
NO
L 120-132
−5.5
31
@
MEM
L 105-136
−23.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −10.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
LAC
L 96-121
−9.5
23
vs
POR
L 120-128
+16.5
25
vs
MEM
L 112-123
+0.5
27
@
SA
L 103-130
+0.5
29
@
NO
L 120-132
+17.5
31
@
MEM
L 105-136
+11.5
over 5under 1avg +6.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Pelicans
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
4-2
67% covers · avg +5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-2
67% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
IND
L 120-123
−0.5
23
@
UTAH
L 119-120
+0.5
24
@
DEN
L 135-141
+5.5
28
vs
DEN
L 91-104
−8.5
29
vs
SAC
W 132-120
+5.5
31
vs
ATL
W 121-99
+27.5
covered 4didn’t cover 2avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
IND
L 120-123
+4.5
23
@
UTAH
L 119-120
+0.5
24
@
DEN
L 135-141
+36.5
28
vs
DEN
L 91-104
−46.5
29
vs
SAC
W 132-120
+17.5
31
vs
ATL
W 121-99
−19.5
over 4under 2avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Pelicans has the better starters
Position by position: Kings 0, Pelicans 4, even 1
KingsBetterPelicans
G D. Acuff26.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 4
→NOBig
G D. Murray17.8 pts · 5.8 reb · 6 ast
Score 45
F D. Sabonis16 pts · 15.8 reb · 7.3 ast
Score 26
=Even
G J. Fears13 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 19
F D. Hunter14 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 38
→NOBig
F Z. Williamson20.7 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 81
F P. Achiuwa12.5 pts · 6 reb · 1 ast
Score 7
→NOBig
F H. Jones6.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 75
F L. Black7.1 pts · 5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 13
→NOBig
C D. Jordan6 pts · 6.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 52
KingsBetterPelicans
SAC offense27th of 30 · -3.0
=Even
NO defense24th of 30 · -3.7
SAC defense29th of 30 · -7.9
→NOBig
NO offense13th of 30 · +1.1
Backcourt-13.7 · 1 player
→NOBig
Backcourt-1.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt-18.6 · 4 players
→NOBig
Frontcourt+15.7 · 3 players
Bench-13.2 · 5 players
←SACSmall
Bench-16.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSAC betterNO betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Acuff37 minE. Sharp18 minD. Plowden14 minM. Monk12 minN. Clifford8 minA. FlaglerNew
Forwards
D. Sabonis37 minD. Hunter29 minP. Achiuwa29 minL. Black29 minJ. Mogbo17 minA. Karaban10 min
Out
Z. LaVineDay-To-DayK. MurrayOut
Guards
D. Murray32 minJ. Fears25 minS. Bey25 minB. McGowens21 minB. Mathurin18 minA. Johnson10 min
Forwards
Z. Williamson32 minH. Jones21 minJ. Reese31 minT. Watford18 minK. Matkovic16 min
Centers
D. Jordan17 minD. Queen24 min
Out
J. PooleOutT. MurphyDay-To-DayY. MissiOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 109.3 #22 | Points per game | 119.7 #7 |
| 1.03 #28 | Points per possession | 1.10 #15 |
| 106.0 #6 | Pace (possessions) | 108.0 #2 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #23 | Effective FG% | 55.1 #9 |
| 30.4 #27 | 3-point % | 31.2 #25 |
| 38.0 #27 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.8 #30 |
| 26.4 #20 | Free throw rate | 35.3 #4 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #19 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #26 |
| 22.9 #28 | Offensive rebound rate | 24.3 #25 |
| 24.5 #23 | Assists per game | 25.5 #21 |
| Defense | ||
| 128.3 #29 | Points allowed | 117.8 #24 |
| 1.21 #29 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #16 |
| 60.4 #30 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.2 #21 |
| 39.2 #27 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.5 #5 |
| 14.6 #22 | Turnovers forced | 16.3 #10 |
| 73.7 #12 | Defensive rebound rate | 76.4 #6 |
| 8.0 #21 | Steals per game | 13.7 #1 |
| 2.3 #30 | Blocks per game | 4.8 #16 |
Kings
0-6 overall · 0-6 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Grizzlies105–136
- L@ Pelicans120–132
- L@ Spurs103–130
- Lvs Grizzlies112–123
- Lvs Trail Blazers120–128
A week or more of rest.
Pelicans
2-4 overall · 1-3 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Hawks121–99
- Wvs Kings132–120
- Lvs Nuggets91–104
- L@ Nuggets135–141
- L@ Jazz119–120
A week or more of rest.