Little Caesars Arena · at Pistons
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DET | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-0 | Record | 5-1 |
| 6-0 | ATS | 5-1 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DET 117–107 · win probability DET 75%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 224.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
MEM 4, DET 4 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
MEM has played the 30th-hardest schedule, DET the 17th. A record against a soft schedule means less
MEM offense vs DET defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 1st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MEM 30.6%, DET 27.2%. Defensive: MEM 75.0%, DET 72.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MEM 25.3, DET 28.9. Allowed: MEM 31.4, DET 28.1
Context
Tempo
About 102 possessions: MEM plays 103.6 a game (13th fastest), DET 100.9 (29th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%; DET hits 36.3% and allows 32.5%. Threes are 42.1% and 43.3% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2; DET 53.1 and allows 48.8
Home court
DET at home. This season: DET 2-0 at home, MEM 4-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MEM 15.4%, DET 15.6%. Forced: MEM 15.7%, DET 17.1%
DET offense vs MEM defense
Offense 17th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Recent form
Last 5: MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2; DET 4-1 ATS, margin +8.0
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MEM 100%, DET 100%. Transfers in: MEM 0, DET 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelDET -9.3
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model224.2
Model edge—
Projected score
MEM 107.4 · DET 116.7
Win probability
DET 75%
1st half
Spread
DET -5.1
Total
112.4
Projected score
MEM 53.7 · DET 58.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% | |
| 5-1 83% | 5-1 83% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
MEM 9–2 DETMEM leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · DET has won the last 2 meetings · MEM 9-1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2025-26 | MEM 110 @ DET 126 | DET -16.5 | MEM W |
| Nov 3, 2025-26 | DET 114 @ MEM 106 | MEM +4.5 | DET W |
| Apr 5, 2024-25 | MEM 109 @ DET 103 | DET +1.5 | MEM W |
| Nov 27, 2024-25 | DET 111 @ MEM 131 | MEM -7.5 | MEM W |
| Apr 5, 2023-24 | DET 90 @ MEM 108 | MEM +1.5 | MEM W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Pistons
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
5-1
83% covers · avg +5.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −11.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
vs
BOS
W 121-113
+9.5
23
@
MIA
W 128-111
+14.5
25
@
PHI
W 106-93
+11.5
27
@
NY
L 97-111
−9.5
28
vs
CHA
W 97-89
+0.5
30
@
BKN
W 110-94
+7.5
covered 5didn’t cover 1avg +5.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
vs
BOS
W 121-113
+13.5
23
@
MIA
W 128-111
+3.5
25
@
PHI
W 106-93
−29.5
27
@
NY
L 97-111
−12.5
28
vs
CHA
W 97-89
−26.5
30
@
BKN
W 110-94
−18.5
over 2under 4avg −11.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Grizzlies 2, Pistons 1, even 2
GrizzliesBetterPistons
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
←MEMBig
G C. Cunningham22.2 pts · 5.5 reb · 7.2 ast
Score 47
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
=Even
G A. Thompson8.8 pts · 7.4 reb · 5 ast
Score 79
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
→DETBig
F D. Robinson16.8 pts · 2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 77
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
=Even
F P. Reed13.8 pts · 7 reb · 2 ast
Score 97
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
←MEMBig
F J. Collins9.2 pts · 7.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 30
GrizzliesBetterPistons
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
→DETSmall
DET defense1st of 30 · +7.1
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
=Even
DET offense17th of 30 · -0.6
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
←MEMBig
Backcourt+10.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
←MEMBig
Frontcourt+19.7 · 3 players
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
→DETBig
Bench+22.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMEM betterDET betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Guards
C. Cunningham34 minA. Thompson26 minD. Jenkins25 minE. Harkless21 minK. Huerter21 minJ. Green19 min
Forwards
D. Robinson30 minP. Reed27 minJ. Collins27 minT. Prince24 minR. Holland16 minT. Smith8 min
Centers
I. Jones5 min
Out
I. JoeOutJ. DurenOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 121.2 #1 | Points per game | 109.8 #21 |
| 1.16 #4 | Points per possession | 1.09 #18 |
| 103.6 #13 | Pace (possessions) | 100.9 #29 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.9 #5 | Effective FG% | 53.1 #17 |
| 41.7 #1 | 3-point % | 36.3 #9 |
| 42.1 #19 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.3 #13 |
| 25.3 #22 | Free throw rate | 28.9 #14 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #16 | Turnover rate | 15.6 #17 |
| 30.6 #5 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.2 #17 |
| 27.0 #13 | Assists per game | 26.7 #15 |
| Defense | ||
| 106.0 #3 | Points allowed | 101.8 #1 |
| 1.03 #2 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #1 |
| 49.2 #3 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.8 #2 |
| 30.0 #3 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.5 #10 |
| 15.7 #15 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #6 |
| 75.0 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.8 #15 |
| 6.3 #28 | Steals per game | 9.0 #12 |
| 5.2 #11 | Blocks per game | 6.7 #4 |
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.
Pistons
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Nets110–94
- Wvs Hornets97–89
- L@ Knicks97–111
- W@ 76ers106–93
- W@ Heat128–111
A week or more of rest.