FedExForum · at Grizzlies
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 6-0 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 6-0 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MEM 119–108 · win probability MEM 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 226.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
BKN 1, MEM 8 · 2026-27 so far
Shooting
Effective FG%: BKN 50.7 and allows 55.3; MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2
BKN offense vs MEM defense
Offense 29th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
BKN hits 35.1% and allows 35.8%; MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%. Threes are 48.0% and 42.1% of their shots
MEM offense vs BKN defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 22nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
BKN has played the 19th-hardest schedule, MEM the 30th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Recent form
Last 5: BKN 3-2 ATS, margin -8.0; MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BKN 25.4%, MEM 30.6%. Defensive: BKN 77.8%, MEM 75.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: BKN 32.9, MEM 25.3. Allowed: BKN 33.5, MEM 31.4
Home court
MEM at home. This season: MEM 2-0 at home, BKN 1-2 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BKN 18.2%, MEM 15.4%. Forced: BKN 15.9%, MEM 15.7%
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: BKN plays 105.1 a game (10th fastest), MEM 103.6 (13th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BKN 100%, MEM 100%. Transfers in: BKN 0, MEM 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMEM -10.3
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model226.7
Model edge—
Projected score
BKN 108.2 · MEM 118.5
Win probability
MEM 77%
1st half
Spread
MEM -5.7
Total
113.6
Projected score
BKN 54 · MEM 59.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
BKN 5–6 MEMMEM leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · BKN 6-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2025-26 | MEM 115 @ BKN 126 | BKN -1.5 | BKN W |
| Jan 11, 2025-26 | BKN 98 @ MEM 103 | MEM -7.5 | BKN W |
| Dec 13, 2024-25 | BKN 119 @ MEM 135 | MEM -9.5 | MEM W |
| Nov 4, 2024-25 | MEM 104 @ BKN 106 | BKN +4.5 | BKN W |
| Oct 30, 2024-25 | BKN 119 @ MEM 106 | MEM -12.5 | BKN W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Nets
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
CHA
L 103-110
−5.5
24
@
CLE
L 121-125
+7.5
25
vs
IND
L 109-136
−21.5
27
@
BOS
L 124-125
+12.5
30
vs
DET
L 94-110
−7.5
1
@
IND
W 98-90
+11.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
CHA
L 103-110
−7.5
24
@
CLE
L 121-125
+17.5
25
vs
IND
L 109-136
+13.5
27
@
BOS
L 124-125
+25.5
30
vs
DET
L 94-110
−18.5
1
@
IND
W 98-90
−42.5
over 3under 3avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Nets 0, Grizzlies 3, even 2
NetsBetterGrizzlies
G K. Ellis5 pts · 2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 21
→MEMBig
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
G N. Traore10.5 pts · 1.8 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 1
→MEMBig
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
F J. Randle20.8 pts · 7.2 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 39
=Even
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
F M. Porter21.2 pts · 7.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 91
=Even
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
C D. Sharpe8 pts · 7.7 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 6
→MEMBig
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
NetsBetterGrizzlies
BKN offense29th of 30 · -5.5
→MEMBig
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
BKN defense22nd of 30 · -1.7
→MEMBig
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
Backcourt-12.0 · 2 players
→MEMBig
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
Frontcourt+7.8 · 3 players
→MEMBig
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
Bench-17.9 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBKN betterMEM betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Ellis24 minN. Traore21 minT. Mann24 minD. Powell21 minB. Saraf21 min
Forwards
J. Randle34 minM. Porter32 minC. Johnson22 minN. Clowney22 minD. Wolf21 minJ. Minott11 min
Centers
D. Sharpe23 minM. Wagner19 min
Out
M. BrownDay-To-DayE. DeminOut
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 108.2 #25 | Points per game | 121.2 #1 |
| 1.03 #29 | Points per possession | 1.16 #4 |
| 105.1 #10 | Pace (possessions) | 103.6 #13 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.7 #26 | Effective FG% | 55.9 #5 |
| 35.1 #15 | 3-point % | 41.7 #1 |
| 48.0 #3 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.1 #19 |
| 32.9 #6 | Free throw rate | 25.3 #22 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #27 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #16 |
| 25.4 #23 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.6 #5 |
| 22.8 #28 | Assists per game | 27.0 #13 |
| Defense | ||
| 116.0 #21 | Points allowed | 106.0 #3 |
| 1.11 #18 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #2 |
| 55.3 #23 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.2 #3 |
| 35.8 #19 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.0 #3 |
| 15.9 #12 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #15 |
| 77.8 #2 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.0 #9 |
| 9.0 #14 | Steals per game | 6.3 #28 |
| 4.7 #17 | Blocks per game | 5.2 #11 |
Nets
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Pacers98–90
- Lvs Pistons94–110
- L@ Celtics124–125
- Lvs Pacers109–136
- L@ Cavaliers121–125
A week or more of rest.
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.