Wolstein Center · at Cleveland St · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
IUIN -2.5✓ CLE covered by 10.5
Closing total169.5Over by 24.5
| This season | CLE | |
|---|---|---|
| 5-24 | Record | 7-21 |
| 12-17 | ATS | 11-17 |
| 12-17 | O/U | 18-10 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: IUIN 86–88 CLE · ✓ CLE (57%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IUIN | 36 | 57 | 93 |
| CLE | 45 | 56 | 101 |
1st half: IUIN 36, CLE 45 (CLE by 9). The model had CLE by 1.1 and a total of 81.1 (actual 81).
Team stats
| IUIN | CLE | |
|---|---|---|
| 35-73 48% | Field goals | 37-59 63% |
| 9-24 38% | 3-pointers | 11-20 55% |
| 14-19 74% | Free throws | 16-23 70% |
| 30 10 off | Rebounds | 37 5 off |
| 20 | Assists | 17 |
| 8 | Steals | 9 |
| 2 | Blocks | 4 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 19 | Fouls | 16 |
| 46 | Points in paint | 48 |
| 13 | Fast-break points | 35 |
Players
| IUIN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maguire Mitchell G | 36 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 9-18 | 5-11 |
| Kyler D'Augustino G | 35 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 8-16 | 1-1 |
| Finley Woodward F | 34 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5-13 | 0-0 |
| Jaxon Edwards G | 32 | 23 | 10 | 2 | 9-13 | 1-3 |
| Reece Hagy F | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Kameron Tinsley F | 25 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| Micah Davis G | 25 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-3 |
| Aiden Miller F | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Garrett Sever, Gabe Stewart, JP Dragas, Corey Boston, Lav Cvetkovic, Matt Compas, Ajay Holubar
| CLE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaidon Lipscomb G | 37 | 23 | 5 | 8 | 7-12 | 5-7 |
| Preist Ryan F | 36 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 10-16 | 0-0 |
| Tre Beard G | 36 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| Holden Pierre-Louis F | 20 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| Kamari Jones G | 17 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Foster Wonders G | 25 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| Chevalier Emery G | 22 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 7-11 | 2-2 |
| Manny Hill G | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: David Giddens, Kevo St. Hilaire, Ivan Spirov, Lucas Burton, Waqo Tessema, Dayan Nessah, Josiah Harris
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketIUIN -2.5
ModelCLE -2.0
Model edgeCLE +4.5
W CLE covered
Total
Market169.5
Model173.6
Model edgeOver 4.1
W Over
Projected score
IUIN 85.8 · CLE 87.8
IUIN 93 · CLE 101
Win probability
CLE 57%
1st half
Spread
CLE -1.1
CLE -9.0
Total
81.1
81 points
Projected score
IUIN 40 · CLE 41.1
IUIN 36 · CLE 45
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCLE -1.5
4 → IUIN
CloseIUIN -2.5
4 pts toward IUIN
Total
Open173.5
▼ 4
Close169.5
Down 4 since the open
Moneyline
IUIN -135 · CLE +114
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CLE -1.5 · closed IUIN -2.5 · moved 4 toward IUINmodel CLE -2
model CLE -2
Opened 173.5 · closed 169.5 · moved 4 downmodel 173.5
model 173.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
IUIN 1–9 CLECLE leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · IUIN 5-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2025-26 | CLE 74 @ IUIN 82 | IUIN -2.5 | IUIN W |
| Dec 29, 2025-26 | IUIN 86 @ CLE 99 | CLE -1.5 | CLE W |
| Jan 19, 2024-25 | CLE 73 @ IUIN 62 | IUIN +5.5 | CLE W |
| Jan 4, 2024-25 | IUIN 61 @ CLE 67 | CLE -9.5 | IUIN W |
| Mar 5, 2023-24 | IUIN 66 @ CLE 85 | CLE -16.5 | CLE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
IU Indy
29 games played
Straight up
5-24
17% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-17
41% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 102-118 | +33.5 | W +17.5 | 172.5 | O 220 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 90-94 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 185.5 | U 184 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 80-112 | +20.5 | L −11.5 | 192.5 | U 192 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 90-83 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 186.5 | U 173 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 91-103 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 188.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 80-101 | -2.5 | L −23.5 | 181.5 | U 181 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 85-98 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 175.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 85-80 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 181.5 | U 165 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 78-92 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 180.5 | U 170 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 55-78 | +6.5 | L −16.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 11 | vs | L 75-85 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 78-91 | +23.5 | W +10.5 | 169.5 | U 169 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 86-99 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 172.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 72-81 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 176.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 77-81 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 59-75 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 83-95 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 96-93 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 77-80 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 169.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 103-85 | +14.5 | W +32.5 | 176.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 58-74 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 76-85 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-74 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 169.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 88-92 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 81-84 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 78-83 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 73-85 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 74-86 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 169.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 81-87 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
OSU
L 102-118
+17.5
6
vs
LIU
L 90-94
−8.5
8
@
BTLR
L 80-112
−11.5
14
@
EMU
W 90-83
+11.5
18
@
CHSO
L 91-103
−13.5
21
vs
ALST
L 80-101
−23.5
23
@
AF
L 85-98
−9.5
29
vs
MORE
W 85-80
+1.5
3
@
DETM
L 78-92
−10.5
6
vs
YSU
L 55-78
−16.5
11
vs
GB
L 75-85
−13.5
22
@
GCU
L 78-91
+10.5
29
@
CLE
L 86-99
−11.5
1
@
NKU
L 72-81
+4.5
4
vs
WRST
L 77-81
+4.5
9
@
GB
L 59-75
−9.5
11
@
MILW
L 83-95
−3.5
15
vs
RMU
W 96-93
+8.5
17
vs
DETM
L 77-80
−4.5
21
@
OAK
W 103-85
+32.5
28
@
RMU
L 58-74
−7.5
30
@
YSU
L 76-85
+1.5
7
vs
CLE
W 82-74
+5.5
10
vs
MILW
L 88-92
−1.5
12
vs
NKU
L 81-84
+2.5
15
@
PFW
L 78-83
+2.5
19
@
WRST
L 73-85
−0.5
25
vs
OAK
L 74-86
−6.5
28
vs
PFW
L 81-87
−4.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
OSU
L 102-118
+47.5
6
vs
LIU
L 90-94
−1.5
8
@
BTLR
L 80-112
−0.5
14
@
EMU
W 90-83
−13.5
18
@
CHSO
L 91-103
+5.5
21
vs
ALST
L 80-101
−0.5
23
@
AF
L 85-98
+7.5
29
vs
MORE
W 85-80
−16.5
3
@
DETM
L 78-92
−10.5
6
vs
YSU
L 55-78
−38.5
11
vs
GB
L 75-85
−5.5
22
@
GCU
L 78-91
−0.5
29
@
CLE
L 86-99
+12.5
1
@
NKU
L 72-81
−23.5
4
vs
WRST
L 77-81
−4.5
9
@
GB
L 59-75
−22.5
11
@
MILW
L 83-95
+12.5
15
vs
RMU
W 96-93
+28.5
17
vs
DETM
L 77-80
−12.5
21
@
OAK
W 103-85
+11.5
28
@
RMU
L 58-74
−30.5
30
@
YSU
L 76-85
+7.5
7
vs
CLE
W 82-74
−13.5
10
vs
MILW
L 88-92
+21.5
12
vs
NKU
L 81-84
+0.5
15
@
PFW
L 78-83
+1.5
19
@
WRST
L 73-85
−2.5
25
vs
OAK
L 74-86
−9.5
28
vs
PFW
L 81-87
+4.5
over 12under 17avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Cleveland St
28 games played
Straight up
7-21
25% wins
Against the spread
11-17
39% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-10
64% overs · avg +6.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 88-91 | +17.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 63-110 | +23.5 | L −23.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 95-102 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 87-82 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 75-90 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 71-91 | +15.5 | L −4.5 | 172.5 | U 162 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 59-86 | +31.5 | W +4.5 | 170.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-95 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 59-71 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 158.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 77-101 | +18.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 71-81 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 99-86 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 172.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 71-74 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 74-97 | +15.5 | L −7.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 84-94 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 73-88 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 80-78 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 85-79 | +15.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 89-82 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 90-88 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 91-78 | +7.5 | W +20.5 | 170.5 | U 169 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-82 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 169.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 68-85 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 90-102 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 157.5 | O 192 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 82-106 | +11.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 86-92 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 70-81 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 64-83 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
LUC
L 88-91
+14.5
10
@
NU
L 63-110
−23.5
15
vs
KENT
L 95-102
+4.5
16
vs
RAD
W 87-82
+13.5
19
vs
VAL
L 75-90
−17.5
22
@
KENT
L 71-91
−4.5
28
@
MIZ
L 59-86
+4.5
3
@
NKU
L 80-95
−0.5
6
vs
DETM
L 59-71
−13.5
17
@
UAB
L 77-101
−5.5
21
vs
MILW
L 71-81
−3.5
29
vs
IUIN
W 99-86
+11.5
4
@
PFW
L 71-74
+8.5
9
@
OAK
L 74-97
−7.5
11
@
DETM
L 84-94
−3.5
15
vs
GB
L 73-88
−11.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-78
+10.5
21
@
WRST
W 85-79
+21.5
30
@
GB
W 89-82
+14.5
1
@
MILW
W 90-88
+11.5
4
vs
OAK
W 91-78
+20.5
7
@
IUIN
L 74-82
−5.5
12
vs
RMU
L 68-85
−13.5
15
vs
WRST
L 90-102
−4.5
18
@
YSU
L 82-106
−12.5
22
vs
PFW
L 86-92
−2.5
25
vs
NKU
L 70-81
−2.5
28
@
RMU
L 64-83
−6.5
covered 11didn’t cover 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
LUC
L 88-91
+27.5
10
@
NU
L 63-110
+21.5
15
vs
KENT
L 95-102
+31.5
16
vs
RAD
W 87-82
+6.5
19
vs
VAL
L 75-90
+6.5
22
@
KENT
L 71-91
−10.5
28
@
MIZ
L 59-86
−25.5
3
@
NKU
L 80-95
+16.5
6
vs
DETM
L 59-71
−28.5
17
@
UAB
L 77-101
+21.5
21
vs
MILW
L 71-81
−8.5
29
vs
IUIN
W 99-86
+12.5
4
@
PFW
L 71-74
−14.5
9
@
OAK
L 74-97
+1.5
11
@
DETM
L 84-94
+15.5
15
vs
GB
L 73-88
+10.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-78
+5.5
21
@
WRST
W 85-79
+7.5
30
@
GB
W 89-82
+20.5
1
@
MILW
W 90-88
+17.5
4
vs
OAK
W 91-78
−1.5
7
@
IUIN
L 74-82
−13.5
12
vs
RMU
L 68-85
−1.5
15
vs
WRST
L 90-102
+34.5
18
@
YSU
L 82-106
+30.5
22
vs
PFW
L 86-92
+14.5
25
vs
NKU
L 70-81
−15.5
28
@
RMU
L 64-83
−10.5
over 18under 10avg +6.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
IU Indy
5-24 overall · 3-17 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue FW81–87
- Lvs Oakland74–86
- L@ Wright St73–85
- L@ Purdue FW78–83
- Lvs N Kentucky81–84
2 days since their last game.
Cleveland St
7-21 overall · 6-14 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Robert Morris64–83
- Lvs N Kentucky70–81
- Lvs Purdue FW86–92
- L@ Youngstown St82–106
- Lvs Wright St90–102
2 days since their last game.