Chaifetz Arena · at Saint Louis · Conference game
Closing line
SLU -21.5✓ LUC covered by 7.5
SLU -21.5✓ LUC covered by 7.5Closing total155.5Under by 11.5
 LUC | This season | SLU |
|---|---|---|
| 7-22 | Record | 25-3 |
| 9-20 | ATS | 18-10 |
| 14-15 | O/U | 14-14 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: LUC 67–87 SLU · ✓ SLU (97%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUC | 32 | 33 | 65 |
| SLU | 40 | 39 | 79 |
1st half: LUC 32, SLU 40 (SLU by 8). The model had SLU by 12.3 and a total of 71.9 (actual 72).
Team stats
| LUC | SLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 24-51 47% | Field goals | 29-48 60% |
| 12-25 48% | 3-pointers | 9-17 53% |
| 5-7 71% | Free throws | 12-18 67% |
| 23 6 off | Rebounds | 26 5 off |
| 11 | Assists | 16 |
| 4 | Steals | 3 |
| 5 | Blocks | 6 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 7 |
| 16 | Fouls | 11 |
| 22 | Points in paint | 40 |
| 0 | Fast-break points | 12 |
Players
| LUC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kayde Dotson G | 35 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 6-14 | 5-8 |
| Deywilk Tavarez G | 35 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-5 |
| Xavier Amos F | 32 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 9-12 | 6-7 |
| Miles Rubin C | 30 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| Daniil Glazkov G | 28 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Joshua Ola-Joseph F | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Nic Anderson G | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Alexander Richardson C | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Caleb Reese G | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Sam Yurasek, Brayden Young, Zachary Royster, Dominick Harris, Chuck Love III, Kymany Houinsou, Justin Moore
| SLU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robbie Avila C | 27 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 4-9 | 1-2 |
| Dion Brown G | 25 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 6-6 | 1-1 |
| Paul Otieno F | 22 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Kellen Thames G | 19 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| Jaden Schertz G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Amari McCottry G | 24 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 6-9 | 2-3 |
| Quentin Jones G | 24 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Trey Green G | 23 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-3 |
| Ishan Sharma F | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 2-5 |
| Brady Dunlap F | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-3 |
| Isaac Holmes G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jax Kerr F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Badara Diakite, Luke Laczkowski, Cam Hutson, Dylan Warlick, Kalu Anya
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketSLU -21.5
ModelSLU -20.8
Model edgeLUC +0.7
W LUC covered
Total
Market155.5
Model153.8
Model edgeUnder 1.7
W Under
Projected score
LUC 66.5 · SLU 87.3
LUC 65 · SLU 79
Win probability
SLU 97%
1st half
Spread
SLU -12.3
SLU -8.0
Total
71.9
72 points
Projected score
LUC 29.8 · SLU 42.1
LUC 32 · SLU 40
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSLU -27.5
6 → LUC
CloseSLU -21.5
6 pts toward LUC
Total
Open155.5
no move
Close155.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
LUC +2000 · SLU -6500
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SLU -27.5 · closed SLU -21.5 · moved 6 toward LUCmodel SLU -21
model SLU -21
Opened 155.5 · unchangedmodel 154
model 154
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUC | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
| SLU | 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
LUC 4–4 SLUSeries tied · 8 games since 2021-22 · LUC 4-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2025-26 | SLU 86 @ LUC 59 | LUC +17.5 | SLU W |
| Mar 14, 2024-25 | SLU 64 vs LUC 72 | LUC -1.5 | LUC W |
| Mar 1, 2024-25 | LUC 67 @ SLU 98 | SLU -2.5 | SLU W |
| Feb 14, 2024-25 | SLU 69 @ LUC 78 | LUC -2.5 | LUC W |
| Jan 30, 2023-24 | SLU 62 @ LUC 77 | LUC -9.5 | LUC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Loyola Chicago
29 games played
Straight up
7-22
24% wins
Against the spread
9-20
31% covers · avg −6.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs CLE | W 91-88 | -17.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 6 | vs MERC | L 65-73 | -21.5 | L −29.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs UNT | L 62-64 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 13 | @ WICH | L 74-95 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 16 | vs CSU | L 67-80 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 21 | vs NIU | L 59-76 | -13.5 | L −30.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs UNI | L 51-72 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 26 | vs SJSU | L 51-63 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 2 | vs CMU | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | vs PRIN | W 73-68 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 14 | vs CHST | L 75-84 | -15.5 | L −24.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 17 | @ SF | L 71-85 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs SCU | W 80-78 | +15.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 31 | @ URI | W 61-57 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs DAY | L 68-70 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 7 | vs DAV | L 64-79 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | @ GW | L 66-101 | +14.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 13 | vs GMU | L 74-82 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 16 | @DAY | L 51-78 | +16.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 20 | @ SBU | L 70-84 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 24 | vs DUQ | L 59-71 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 27 | vs JOES | L 64-85 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 30 | @ VCU | L 75-89 | +18.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 3 | vs LAS | W 71-61 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 6 | @DAV | L 64-84 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 13 | vsSLU | L 59-86 | +17.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 18 | @ FOR | L 59-62 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 21 | @JOES | L 61-75 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs RICH | W 69-66 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vsCLE
CLEW 91-88
−14.5
6
vsMERC
MERCL 65-73
−29.5
9
vsUNT
UNTL 62-64
−3.5
13
@WICH
WICHL 74-95
−15.5
16
vsCSU
CSUL 67-80
−9.5
21
vsNIU
NIUL 59-76
−30.5
25
vsUNI
UNIL 51-72
−12.5
26
vsSJSU
SJSUL 51-63
−10.5
2
vsCMU
CMUW 83-72
+4.5
6
vsPRIN
PRINW 73-68
−1.5
14
vsCHST
CHSTL 75-84
−24.5
17
@SF
SFL 71-85
−2.5
20
vsSCU
SCUW 80-78
+17.5
31
@URI
URIW 61-57
+13.5
3
vsDAY
DAYL 68-70
+5.5
7
vsDAV
DAVL 64-79
−13.5
10
@GW
GWL 66-101
−20.5
13
vsGMU
GMUL 74-82
+3.5
16
@DAY
DAYL 51-78
−10.5
20
@SBU
SBUL 70-84
−3.5
24
vsDUQ
DUQL 59-71
−6.5
27
vsJOES
JOESL 64-85
−19.5
30
@VCU
VCUL 75-89
+4.5
3
vsLAS
LASW 71-61
+7.5
6
@DAV
DAVL 64-84
−10.5
13
vsSLU
SLUL 59-86
−9.5
18
@FOR
FORL 59-62
+5.5
21
@JOES
JOESL 61-75
−4.5
28
vsRICH
RICHW 69-66
+5.5
covered 9didn’t cover 20avg −6.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vsCLE
CLEW 91-88
+27.5
6
vsMERC
MERCL 65-73
−6.5
9
vsUNT
UNTL 62-64
−12.5
13
@WICH
WICHL 74-95
+15.5
16
vsCSU
CSUL 67-80
−4.5
21
vsNIU
NIUL 59-76
−13.5
25
vsUNI
UNIL 51-72
−11.5
26
vsSJSU
SJSUL 51-63
−22.5
2
vsCMU
CMUW 83-72
+14.5
6
vsPRIN
PRINW 73-68
+4.5
14
vsCHST
CHSTL 75-84
+18.5
17
@SF
SFL 71-85
+12.5
20
vsSCU
SCUW 80-78
+6.5
31
@URI
URIW 61-57
−27.5
3
vsDAY
DAYL 68-70
−2.5
7
vsDAV
DAVL 64-79
+6.5
10
@GW
GWL 66-101
+12.5
13
vsGMU
GMUL 74-82
+15.5
16
@DAY
DAYL 51-78
−12.5
20
@SBU
SBUL 70-84
+6.5
24
vsDUQ
DUQL 59-71
−22.5
27
vsJOES
JOESL 64-85
+5.5
30
@VCU
VCUL 75-89
+13.5
3
vsLAS
LASW 71-61
−8.5
6
@DAV
DAVL 64-84
+7.5
13
vsSLU
SLUL 59-86
−10.5
18
@FOR
FORL 59-62
−14.5
21
@JOES
JOESL 61-75
−6.5
28
vsRICH
RICHW 69-66
−11.5
over 14under 15avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Saint Louis
28 games played
Straight up
25-3
89% wins
Against the spread
18-10
64% covers · avg +4.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs SEMO | W 92-67 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 6 | vsCHST | W 108-86 | -30.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 10 | vs LIN | W 109-66 | -24.5 | W +18.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | vs GCU | W 78-64 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 167.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs PFW | W 91-60 | -19.5 | W +11.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 27 | vsSCU | W 71-70 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs STAN | L 77-78 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 2 | @ LMU | W 91-70 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 7 | vsCMU | W 107-65 | -24.5 | W +17.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vsSF | W 85-75 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs BCU | W 112-53 | -26.5 | W +32.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 21 | vs UNH | W 93-79 | -34.5 | L −20.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 31 | vsJOES | W 102-79 | -19.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | @VCU | W 71-62 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @LAS | W 84-72 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | vsFOR | W 78-56 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vsRICH | W 88-63 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 20 | @DUQ | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 23 | @SBU | W 97-62 | -8.5 | W +26.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 27 | vsGW | W 79-76 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 30 | vsDAY | W 102-71 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 3 | @DAV | W 91-82 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 7 | vsLAS | W 82-58 | -22.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 13 | @LUC | W 86-59 | -17.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 17 | @URI | L 76-81 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | vsVCU | W 88-75 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 24 | @DAY | L 62-77 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vsDUQ | W 91-76 | -13.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vsSEMO
SEMOW 92-67
+5.5
6
vsCHST
CHSTW 108-86
−8.5
10
vsLIN
LINW 109-66
+18.5
15
vsGCU
GCUW 78-64
+5.5
21
vsPFW
PFWW 91-60
+11.5
27
vsSCU
SCUW 71-70
−0.5
28
vsSTAN
STANL 77-78
−2.5
2
@LMU
LMUW 91-70
+13.5
7
vsCMU
CMUW 107-65
+17.5
13
vsSF
SFW 85-75
−2.5
17
vsBCU
BCUW 112-53
+32.5
21
vsUNH
UNHW 93-79
−20.5
31
vsJOES
JOESW 102-79
+3.5
7
@VCU
VCUW 71-62
+10.5
10
@LAS
LASW 84-72
−5.5
14
vsFOR
FORW 78-56
+4.5
17
vsRICH
RICHW 88-63
+10.5
20
@DUQ
DUQW 81-77
−4.5
23
@SBU
SBUW 97-62
+26.5
27
vsGW
GWW 79-76
−7.5
30
vsDAY
DAYW 102-71
+21.5
3
@DAV
DAVW 91-82
+0.5
7
vsLAS
LASW 82-58
+1.5
13
@LUC
LUCW 86-59
+9.5
17
@URI
URIL 76-81
−14.5
20
vsVCU
VCUW 88-75
+5.5
24
@DAY
DAYL 62-77
−18.5
28
vsDUQ
DUQW 91-76
+1.5
covered 18didn’t cover 10avg +4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vsSEMO
SEMOW 92-67
+5.5
6
vsCHST
CHSTW 108-86
+38.5
10
vsLIN
LINW 109-66
+9.5
15
vsGCU
GCUW 78-64
−25.5
21
vsPFW
PFWW 91-60
−15.5
27
vsSCU
SCUW 71-70
−17.5
28
vsSTAN
STANL 77-78
−5.5
2
@LMU
LMUW 91-70
+10.5
7
vsCMU
CMUW 107-65
+11.5
13
vsSF
SFW 85-75
+4.5
17
vsBCU
BCUW 112-53
+7.5
21
vsUNH
UNHW 93-79
+14.5
31
vsJOES
JOESW 102-79
+19.5
7
@VCU
VCUW 71-62
−38.5
10
@LAS
LASW 84-72
+3.5
14
vsFOR
FORW 78-56
−20.5
17
vsRICH
RICHW 88-63
−11.5
20
@DUQ
DUQW 81-77
−7.5
23
@SBU
SBUW 97-62
−0.5
27
vsGW
GWW 79-76
−12.5
30
vsDAY
DAYW 102-71
+21.5
3
@DAV
DAVW 91-82
+21.5
7
vsLAS
LASW 82-58
−13.5
13
@LUC
LUCW 86-59
−10.5
17
@URI
URIL 76-81
+5.5
20
vsVCU
VCUW 88-75
−1.5
24
@DAY
DAYL 62-77
−18.5
28
vsDUQ
DUQW 91-76
+6.5
over 14under 14avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Loyola Chicago
7-22 overall · 3-13 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Richmond69–66
- L@ Saint Joseph's61–75
- L@ Fordham59–62
- Lvs Saint Louis59–86
- L@ Davidson64–84
4 days since their last game.
Saint Louis
25-3 overall · 14-2 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Duquesne91–76
- L@ Dayton62–77
- Wvs VCU88–75
- L@ Rhode Island76–81
- W@ Loyola Chicago86–59
4 days since their last game.