Buccaneer Fieldhouse · at Charleston So · Conference game
Closing line
CHSO -16.5✓ GWEB covered by 7.5
Closing total161.5Under by 20.5
| This season | CHSO | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-23 | Record | 9-15 |
| 11-13 | ATS | 11-13 |
| 14-10 | O/U | 15-9 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: GWEB 73–88 CHSO · ✓ CHSO (91%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GWEB | 28 | 38 | 66 |
| CHSO | 40 | 35 | 75 |
1st half: GWEB 28, CHSO 40 (CHSO by 12). The model had CHSO by 8.9 and a total of 75.5 (actual 68).
Team stats
| GWEB | CHSO | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-67 39% | Field goals | 28-67 42% |
| 6-27 22% | 3-pointers | 6-23 26% |
| 8-11 73% | Free throws | 13-20 65% |
| 39 8 off | Rebounds | 48 12 off |
| 12 | Assists | 10 |
| 3 | Steals | 7 |
| 4 | Blocks | 5 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 16 | Fouls | 14 |
| 36 | Points in paint | 44 |
| 9 | Fast-break points | 6 |
Players
| GWEB | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob Hudson G | 33 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 7-9 | 1-2 |
| Ace Talbert G | 32 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-5 |
| Jacob Hogarth F | 28 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 4-15 | 0-1 |
| Spence Sims G | 24 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-8 | 1-6 |
| Colin Hawkins G | 16 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| NaVuan Peterson F | 22 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2-6 | 1-5 |
| Jamias Ferere G | 20 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 5-10 | 2-3 |
| DJ Jefferson G | 19 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-2 |
| Riek Riek F | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Ashton King, Julius Clark, Curtis Williams III, Ahmadou Ndiaye, Cameron Gales, Isaiah Hicks, Bo Barber, Paul Lindberg
| CHSO | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob Taylor G | 35 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2-10 | 0-5 |
| Nate Brafford F | 31 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| Jesse Hafemeister F | 28 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 3-8 | 1-4 |
| A'lahn Sumler G | 27 | 27 | 7 | 1 | 10-22 | 1-5 |
| Lase Olalere F | 19 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Reis Jones F | 21 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
| Trent Coleman F | 18 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 4-4 | 3-3 |
| Jaquias Franklin G | 13 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Armari Carraway G | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
Did not play: Easton Hupp, AJ Gladieux, Luke Williams, Brycen Blaine, Devin Brafford, Anthony Gause, Kaleb Lofton
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketCHSO -16.5
ModelCHSO -15.1
Model edgeGWEB +1.4
W GWEB covered
Total
Market161.5
Model161.5
Model edge—
Under
Projected score
GWEB 73.2 · CHSO 88.3
GWEB 66 · CHSO 75
Win probability
CHSO 91%
1st half
Spread
CHSO -8.9
CHSO -12.0
Total
75.5
68 points
Projected score
GWEB 33.3 · CHSO 42.2
GWEB 28 · CHSO 40
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCHSO -17.5
1 → GWEB
CloseCHSO -16.5
1 pt toward GWEB
Total
Open160.5
▲ 1
Close161.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
GWEB +950 · CHSO -1650
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CHSO -17.5 · closed CHSO -16.5 · moved 1 toward GWEBmodel CHSO -15
model CHSO -15
Opened 160.5 · closed 161.5 · moved 1 upmodel 161.5 matches the line
model 161.5 = line ✓
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 1-9 10% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
GWEB 5–4 CHSOGWEB leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · CHSO has won the last 3 meetings · GWEB 6-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2025-26 | CHSO 89 @ GWEB 79 | GWEB +12.5 | GWEB W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | CHSO 79 @ GWEB 72 | GWEB -6.5 | CHSO W |
| Jan 2, 2024-25 | GWEB 63 @ CHSO 72 | CHSO +1.5 | CHSO W |
| Feb 14, 2023-24 | GWEB 85 @ CHSO 77 | CHSO +4.5 | GWEB W |
| Jan 10, 2023-24 | CHSO 86 @ GWEB 74 | GWEB -12.5 | CHSO W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Gardner-Webb
24 games played
Straight up
1-23
4% wins
Against the spread
11-13
46% covers · avg −5.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-10
58% overs · avg +1.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 60-87 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 59-97 | +29.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 84-95 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 62-93 | +21.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 67-102 | +19.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 51-84 | +10.5 | L −22.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-76 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 62-88 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 74-107 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 84-88 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 57-83 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 52-94 | +42.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 79-89 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-88 | +23.5 | W +12.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 49-104 | +26.5 | L −28.5 | 162.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 80-89 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 55-92 | +8.5 | L −28.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 56-91 | +16.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 67-65 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 50-69 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-86 | +12.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 62-68 | +17.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 85-103 | +20.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 87-112 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MINN
L 60-87
+1.5
7
@
CLEM
L 59-97
−8.5
15
@
ELON
L 84-95
+2.5
18
@
DEP
L 62-93
−9.5
22
@
RICH
L 67-102
−15.5
26
vs
NAVY
L 51-84
−22.5
28
vs
SELA
L 68-76
−1.5
29
@
UNCW
L 62-88
−7.5
3
@
QUC
L 74-107
−18.5
6
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+6.5
15
vs
WOF
L 57-83
−15.5
21
@
TENN
L 52-94
+0.5
31
vs
CHSO
L 79-89
+2.5
3
@
WIN
L 77-88
+12.5
7
@
HPU
L 49-104
−28.5
14
vs
RAD
L 80-89
+4.5
17
vs
PRES
L 55-92
−28.5
21
@
LONG
L 56-91
−18.5
23
vs
UPST
W 67-65
+11.5
29
@
UNCA
L 50-69
−1.5
4
vs
LONG
L 66-86
−7.5
7
@
PRES
L 62-68
+11.5
12
vs
WIN
L 85-103
+2.5
14
vs
HPU
L 87-112
+0.5
covered 11didn’t cover 13avg −5.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MINN
L 60-87
−1.5
7
@
CLEM
L 59-97
+10.5
15
@
ELON
L 84-95
+24.5
18
@
DEP
L 62-93
−0.5
22
@
RICH
L 67-102
+14.5
26
vs
NAVY
L 51-84
−18.5
28
vs
SELA
L 68-76
+2.5
29
@
UNCW
L 62-88
+2.5
3
@
QUC
L 74-107
+19.5
6
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+9.5
15
vs
WOF
L 57-83
−15.5
21
@
TENN
L 52-94
−6.5
31
vs
CHSO
L 79-89
+4.5
3
@
WIN
L 77-88
+0.5
7
@
HPU
L 49-104
−9.5
14
vs
RAD
L 80-89
+3.5
17
vs
PRES
L 55-92
+1.5
21
@
LONG
L 56-91
−8.5
23
vs
UPST
W 67-65
−21.5
29
@
UNCA
L 50-69
−30.5
4
vs
LONG
L 66-86
+4.5
7
@
PRES
L 62-68
−15.5
12
vs
WIN
L 85-103
+31.5
14
vs
HPU
L 87-112
+37.5
over 14under 10avg +1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Charleston So
24 games played
Straight up
9-15
38% wins
Against the spread
11-13
46% covers · avg +2.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-9
63% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 67-98 | +18.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 96-86 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 64-68 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 77-83 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 103-91 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 188.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 77-65 | +13.5 | W +25.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 62-74 | +17.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 56-73 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 84-44 | -12.5 | W +27.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 113-90 | -10.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | O 203 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 76-84 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 77-72 | +11.5 | W +16.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 89-79 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-83 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 77-81 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 166.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 82-84 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 81-86 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 83-87 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 79-81 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 75-84 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 55-80 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 94-100 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 84-67 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 80-90 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
VT
L 67-98
−12.5
10
@
CIT
W 96-86
+7.5
13
@
AAMU
L 64-68
−2.5
14
vs
LIN
L 77-83
−3.5
18
vs
IUIN
W 103-91
+13.5
21
@
ECU
W 77-65
+25.5
28
@
SC
L 62-74
+5.5
2
@
UTM
L 56-73
−13.5
8
vs
SCST
W 84-44
+27.5
18
vs
UNF
W 113-90
+12.5
21
@
FUR
L 76-84
+2.5
28
@
RICH
W 77-72
+16.5
31
@
GWEB
W 89-79
−2.5
3
vs
UNCA
W 86-83
−1.5
7
@
WIN
L 77-81
+4.5
10
vs
HPU
L 82-84
+6.5
14
vs
UPST
L 81-86
−11.5
21
@
PRES
L 83-87
−5.5
23
@
LONG
L 79-81
−0.5
29
vs
RAD
L 75-84
−7.5
4
@
HPU
L 55-80
−10.5
7
@
UPST
L 94-100
−7.5
12
vs
PRES
W 84-67
+15.5
14
@
RAD
L 80-90
−5.5
covered 11didn’t cover 13avg +2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
VT
L 67-98
+18.5
10
@
CIT
W 96-86
+36.5
13
@
AAMU
L 64-68
−20.5
14
vs
LIN
L 77-83
+4.5
18
vs
IUIN
W 103-91
+5.5
21
@
ECU
W 77-65
−15.5
28
@
SC
L 62-74
−14.5
2
@
UTM
L 56-73
−18.5
8
vs
SCST
W 84-44
−28.5
18
vs
UNF
W 113-90
+39.5
21
@
FUR
L 76-84
+4.5
28
@
RICH
W 77-72
−10.5
31
@
GWEB
W 89-79
+4.5
3
vs
UNCA
W 86-83
+17.5
7
@
WIN
L 77-81
−8.5
10
vs
HPU
L 82-84
+2.5
14
vs
UPST
L 81-86
+11.5
21
@
PRES
L 83-87
+22.5
23
@
LONG
L 79-81
+3.5
29
vs
RAD
L 75-84
−3.5
4
@
HPU
L 55-80
−27.5
7
@
UPST
L 94-100
+43.5
12
vs
PRES
W 84-67
+4.5
14
@
RAD
L 80-90
+8.5
over 15under 9avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Gardner-Webb
1-23 overall · 1-11 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point87–112
- Lvs Winthrop85–103
- L@ Presbyterian62–68
- Lvs Longwood66–86
- L@ UNC Asheville50–69
3 days since their last game.
Charleston So
9-15 overall · 3-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Radford80–90
- Wvs Presbyterian84–67
- L@ SC Upstate94–100
- L@ High Point55–80
- Lvs Radford75–84
3 days since their last game.