Moda Center · at Trail Blazers · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | POR | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 4-1 |
| 1-5 | ATS | 3-2 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects POR 123–109 · win probability POR 84%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 231.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: POR has more of the edges
UTAH 0, POR 9 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
UTAH has played the 4th-hardest schedule, POR the 27th. A record against a soft schedule means less
POR offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 10th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9; POR 56.2 and allows 51.3
Three-pointers
UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%; POR hits 35.3% and allows 32.1%. Threes are 41.7% and 51.5% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UTAH 17.0%, POR 14.6%. Forced: UTAH 13.3%, POR 14.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: UTAH 31.6, POR 35.9. Allowed: UTAH 33.8, POR 27.8
UTAH offense vs POR defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 11th, on the model’s ratings
Recent form
Last 5: UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2; POR 3-2 ATS, margin +11.4
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UTAH 25.7%, POR 27.6%. Defensive: UTAH 77.1%, POR 77.3%
Home court
POR at home. This season: POR 1-1 at home, UTAH 0-1 away
Context
Tempo
About 104 possessions: UTAH plays 104.0 a game (12th fastest), POR 103.5 (14th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UTAH 100%, POR 100%. Transfers in: UTAH 0, POR 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelPOR -13.8
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model231.8
Model edge—
Projected score
UTAH 109 · POR 122.8
Win probability
POR 84%
1st half
Spread
POR -7.7
Total
116.0
Projected score
UTAH 54.1 · POR 61.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | |
| 4-1 80% | 3-2 60% | 2-3 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 21 since 2021-22
UTAH 10–11 PORPOR leads · 21 games since 2021-22 · POR has won the last 5 meetings · UTAH 14-7 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2026-27 | POR 112 @ UTAH 90 | UTAH +6.5 | POR W |
| Mar 13, 2025-26 | UTAH 114 @ POR 124 | POR -15.5 | UTAH W |
| Feb 12, 2025-26 | POR 135 @ UTAH 119 | UTAH +6.5 | POR W |
| Jan 5, 2025-26 | UTAH 117 @ POR 137 | POR -5.5 | POR W |
| Oct 29, 2025-26 | POR 136 @ UTAH 134 | UTAH +3.5 | UTAH W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Trail Blazers
5 games played
Straight up
4-1
80% wins
Against the spread
3-2
60% covers · avg +6.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-3
40% overs · avg −3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
PHX
W 124-83
+37.5
23
@
SAC
W 128-120
−1.5
27
@
LAL
W 136-129
+8.5
29
vs
MEM
L 103-124
−28.5
31
@
UTAH
W 112-90
+15.5
covered 3didn’t cover 2avg +6.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
PHX
W 124-83
−25.5
23
@
SAC
W 128-120
+16.5
27
@
LAL
W 136-129
+30.5
29
vs
MEM
L 103-124
−6.5
31
@
UTAH
W 112-90
−30.5
over 2under 3avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Trail Blazers has the better starters
Position by position: Jazz 1, Trail Blazers 4, even 0
JazzBetterTrail Blazers
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
→PORBig
G D. Lillard19.2 pts · 4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 89
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
→PORSmall
G S. Henderson8.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 34
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
→PORBig
F D. Avdija23 pts · 6.8 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 82
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
←UTAHBig
F T. Camara15.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 44
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
→PORBig
C D. Clingan8.6 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 74
JazzBetterTrail Blazers
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
→PORSmall
POR defense11th of 30 · +1.8
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
→PORBig
POR offense10th of 30 · +1.4
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
→PORBig
Backcourt+11.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
→PORSmall
Frontcourt+16.7 · 3 players
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
→PORBig
Bench+15.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUTAH betterPOR betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Guards
D. Lillard29 minS. Henderson21 minJ. Holiday25 minS. Cissoko22 minV. Krejci11 minC. Youngblood6 min
Forwards
D. Avdija31 minT. Camara26 minJ. Tonje8 min
Centers
D. Clingan22 minM. Potter19 minR. Williams17 minB. Carlson12 minY. Hansen10 min
Out
J. MorantOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 108.7 #24 | Points per game | 120.6 #4 |
| 1.05 #25 | Points per possession | 1.16 #5 |
| 104.0 #12 | Pace (possessions) | 103.5 #14 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #24 | Effective FG% | 56.2 #4 |
| 32.6 #23 | 3-point % | 35.3 #12 |
| 41.7 #21 | 3-point attempt rate | 51.5 #1 |
| 31.6 #10 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #3 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.0 #25 | Turnover rate | 14.6 #9 |
| 25.7 #22 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.6 #14 |
| 26.2 #19 | Assists per game | 26.2 #17 |
| Defense | ||
| 118.8 #25 | Points allowed | 109.2 #10 |
| 1.14 #25 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #10 |
| 53.9 #18 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #8 |
| 37.6 #25 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.1 #8 |
| 13.3 #28 | Turnovers forced | 14.8 #20 |
| 77.1 #4 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.3 #3 |
| 6.2 #29 | Steals per game | 8.6 #18 |
| 6.5 #5 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #21 |
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.
Trail Blazers
4-1 overall · 4-1 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Jazz112–90
- Lvs Grizzlies103–124
- W@ Lakers136–129
- W@ Kings128–120
- Wvs Suns124–83
A week or more of rest.