Ford Center · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
SEMO -3.5✓ LIN covered by 1.5
Closing total148.5Under by 14.5
| This season | SEMO | |
|---|---|---|
| 15-14 | Record | 16-12 |
| 12-17 | ATS | 14-14 |
| 17-12 | O/U | 13-15 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: LIN 75–77 SEMO · ✓ SEMO (58%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | 34 | 32 | 66 |
| SEMO | 25 | 43 | 68 |
1st half: LIN 34, SEMO 25 (LIN by 9). The model had SEMO by 1.3 and a total of 71.1 (actual 59).
Team stats
| LIN | SEMO | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-60 35% | Field goals | 25-59 42% |
| 3-13 23% | 3-pointers | 6-21 29% |
| 21-32 66% | Free throws | 12-16 75% |
| 46 20 off | Rebounds | 35 10 off |
| 6 | Assists | 12 |
| 6 | Steals | 7 |
| 5 | Blocks | 6 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 16 | Fouls | 23 |
| 34 | Points in paint | 36 |
| 9 | Fast-break points | 10 |
Players
| LIN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dontrez Williams G | 38 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 6-16 | 0-2 |
| Mekhi Cooper G | 36 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Milos Nenadic C | 32 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 2-10 | 0-0 |
| Jadis Jones G | 31 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 4-9 | 0-0 |
| Anias Futrell G | 28 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 4-14 | 2-7 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Clayton Jackson G | 26 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-2 |
| Robert Lewis F | 9 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jeremiah Talton, Jalen Bouknight, Tidiane d'Almeida, William Campbell, Daniel Kwon, Kevin Anthony, Todd Bieg, Jaylon McDaniel
| SEMO | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braxton Stacker G | 34 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 5-10 | 2-4 |
| Luke Almodovar G | 33 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 4-11 | 1-7 |
| Brendan Terry F | 32 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-1 |
| BJ Ward G | 19 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-1 |
| Landren Blocker G | 14 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Marqueas Bell G | 24 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-4 |
| Troy Cole Jr. G | 22 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 5-9 | 0-1 |
| Blaize Sagna G | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| PJ Farmer G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Elliot Lowndes F | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| David Idada C | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Trace Sadler, Saxton Hoepker, Jay Reynolds
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketSEMO -3.5
ModelSEMO -2.3
Model edgeLIN +1.2
W LIN covered
Total
Market148.5
Model152.1
Model edgeOver 3.6
L Under
Projected score
LIN 74.9 · SEMO 77.2
LIN 66 · SEMO 68
Win probability
SEMO 58%
1st half
Spread
SEMO -1.3
LIN -9.0
Total
71.1
59 points
Projected score
LIN 34.9 · SEMO 36.2
LIN 34 · SEMO 25
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSEMO -1.5
2 → SEMO
CloseSEMO -3.5
2 pts toward SEMO
Total
Open149.5
▼ 1
Close148.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
LIN +136 · SEMO -162
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SEMO -1.5 · closed SEMO -3.5 · moved 2 toward SEMOmodel SEMO -2.5
model SEMO -2.5
Opened 149.5 · closed 148.5 · moved 1 downmodel 152
model 152
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
LIN 5–4 SEMOLIN leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · LIN 5-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2025-26 | SEMO 73 @ LIN 61 | LIN -1.5 | SEMO W |
| Jan 15, 2025-26 | LIN 88 @ SEMO 76 | SEMO -6.5 | LIN W |
| Feb 22, 2024-25 | LIN 58 @ SEMO 74 | SEMO -9.5 | SEMO W |
| Jan 23, 2024-25 | SEMO 68 @ LIN 72 | LIN +1.5 | LIN W |
| Jan 30, 2023-24 | SEMO 54 @ LIN 58 | LIN -2.5 | LIN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lindenwood Lions
29 games played
Straight up
15-14
52% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-12
59% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 60-98 | +29.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 66-109 | +24.5 | L −18.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 83-77 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 65-74 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 53-73 | +32.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 80-67 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 99-64 | +3.5 | W +38.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 82-74 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 92-76 | -12.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 65-70 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 77-64 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 83-80 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 62-66 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 74-82 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 88-76 | +6.5 | W +18.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 55-69 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 89-68 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-96 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 73-60 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-78 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 72-78 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 79-74 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 75-74 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 61-73 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 80-89 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 57-72 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 67-71 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 91-69 | -11.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
TTU
L 60-98
−8.5
10
@
SLU
L 66-109
−18.5
14
vs
CHSO
W 83-77
+3.5
16
@
AAMU
L 65-74
−5.5
20
@
IU
L 53-73
+12.5
24
vs
KC
W 80-67
+8.5
2
@
NIU
W 99-64
+38.5
6
@
EIU
W 82-74
−0.5
18
vs
WIU
W 92-76
+3.5
23
@
MOST
L 65-70
−1.5
1
vs
MORE
W 77-64
+6.5
3
vs
USI
W 83-80
−6.5
6
@
SIUE
L 62-66
−2.5
10
vs
LR
L 74-82
−14.5
15
@
SEMO
W 88-76
+18.5
17
@
UTM
L 55-69
−11.5
22
vs
TNTC
W 89-68
+12.5
24
vs
TNST
L 86-96
−14.5
29
@
USI
W 73-60
+8.5
31
@
MORE
W 79-78
−0.5
3
vs
SIUE
L 72-78
−10.5
5
@
LR
W 79-74
+3.5
12
vs
UTM
W 75-74
−0.5
14
vs
SEMO
L 61-73
−13.5
19
@
TNST
L 80-89
−5.5
21
@
TNTC
L 57-72
−16.5
26
vs
EIU
L 67-71
−11.5
28
@
WIU
W 91-69
+10.5
4
vs
LR
W 72-62
+4.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
TTU
L 60-98
+11.5
10
@
SLU
L 66-109
+9.5
14
vs
CHSO
W 83-77
+4.5
16
@
AAMU
L 65-74
−10.5
20
@
IU
L 53-73
−29.5
24
vs
KC
W 80-67
−5.5
2
@
NIU
W 99-64
+15.5
6
@
EIU
W 82-74
+10.5
18
vs
WIU
W 92-76
+21.5
23
@
MOST
L 65-70
−10.5
1
vs
MORE
W 77-64
−6.5
3
vs
USI
W 83-80
+15.5
6
@
SIUE
L 62-66
−14.5
10
vs
LR
L 74-82
+6.5
15
@
SEMO
W 88-76
+9.5
17
@
UTM
L 55-69
−23.5
22
vs
TNTC
W 89-68
+5.5
24
vs
TNST
L 86-96
+21.5
29
@
USI
W 73-60
−17.5
31
@
MORE
W 79-78
+8.5
3
vs
SIUE
L 72-78
+9.5
5
@
LR
W 79-74
+3.5
12
vs
UTM
W 75-74
+3.5
14
vs
SEMO
L 61-73
−20.5
19
@
TNST
L 80-89
+9.5
21
@
TNTC
L 57-72
−22.5
26
vs
EIU
L 67-71
−6.5
28
@
WIU
W 91-69
+10.5
4
vs
LR
W 72-62
−14.5
over 17under 12avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
SE Missouri
28 games played
Straight up
16-12
57% wins
Against the spread
14-14
50% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 67-92 | +19.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 84-89 | +25.5 | W +20.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 72-84 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 70-99 | +23.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 84-68 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 170.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 72-79 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 77-88 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 74-70 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 74-85 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 91-82 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 68-59 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 73-50 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 84-76 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-71 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 76-88 | -6.5 | L −18.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 55-68 | -9.5 | L −22.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 66-50 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 70-65 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 78-74 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-59 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 82-70 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 90-65 | -11.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 56-74 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 137.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 73-61 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 56-53 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-65 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-79 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-73 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SLU
L 67-92
−5.5
7
@
MIZ
L 84-89
+20.5
15
vs
STMN
L 72-84
−9.5
18
@
IOWA
L 70-99
−5.5
25
vs
CP
W 84-68
+14.5
26
@
NAU
L 72-79
−4.5
29
vs
LIP
L 77-88
−14.5
6
@
UTC
W 74-70
+7.5
18
@
TNTC
L 74-85
−13.5
20
@
TNST
W 91-82
+7.5
1
vs
EIU
W 68-59
−3.5
3
vs
WIU
W 73-50
+9.5
8
@
USI
W 84-76
+0.5
10
@
MORE
L 69-71
−7.5
15
vs
LIN
L 76-88
−18.5
17
vs
SIUE
L 55-68
−22.5
20
vs
UTM
W 66-50
+13.5
22
vs
LR
W 70-65
−0.5
29
@
WIU
W 78-74
−6.5
31
@
EIU
W 77-59
+13.5
5
vs
MORE
W 82-70
+4.5
7
vs
USI
W 90-65
+13.5
12
@
SIUE
L 56-74
−19.5
14
@
LIN
W 73-61
+13.5
17
@
UTM
W 56-53
+5.5
21
@
LR
W 70-65
+3.5
26
vs
TNST
L 71-79
−10.5
28
vs
TNTC
W 89-73
+8.5
covered 14didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SLU
L 67-92
+5.5
7
@
MIZ
L 84-89
+15.5
15
vs
STMN
L 72-84
+3.5
18
@
IOWA
L 70-99
+21.5
25
vs
CP
W 84-68
−18.5
26
@
NAU
L 72-79
−2.5
29
vs
LIP
L 77-88
+11.5
6
@
UTC
W 74-70
−5.5
18
@
TNTC
L 74-85
+3.5
20
@
TNST
W 91-82
+21.5
1
vs
EIU
W 68-59
−19.5
3
vs
WIU
W 73-50
−24.5
8
@
USI
W 84-76
+13.5
10
@
MORE
L 69-71
−4.5
15
vs
LIN
L 76-88
+9.5
17
vs
SIUE
L 55-68
−16.5
20
vs
UTM
W 66-50
−24.5
22
vs
LR
W 70-65
−10.5
29
@
WIU
W 78-74
+9.5
31
@
EIU
W 77-59
−2.5
5
vs
MORE
W 82-70
+7.5
7
vs
USI
W 90-65
+13.5
12
@
SIUE
L 56-74
−7.5
14
@
LIN
W 73-61
−20.5
17
@
UTM
W 56-53
−29.5
21
@
LR
W 70-65
−8.5
26
vs
TNST
L 71-79
−1.5
28
vs
TNTC
W 89-73
+20.5
over 13under 15avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Lindenwood Lions
15-14 overall · 12-9 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Little Rock72–62
- W@ W Illinois91–69
- Lvs E Illinois67–71
- L@ Tennessee Tech57–72
- L@ Tennessee St80–89
1 day since their last game.
SE Missouri
16-12 overall · 14-6 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Tennessee Tech89–73
- Lvs Tennessee St71–79
- W@ Little Rock70–65
- W@ UT Martin56–53
- W@ Lindenwood Lions73–61
5 days since their last game.