Sharp Gymnasium · at Hou Christian · Conference game
Closing line
LAM -2.5✓ HCU covered by 24.5
Closing total132.5Under by 4.5
| This season | HCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 10-18 | Record | 9-19 |
| 12-16 | ATS | 13-15 |
| 14-14 | O/U | 14-14 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: LAM 68–66 HCU · ✗ LAM (56%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM | 24 | 29 | 53 |
| HCU | 29 | 46 | 75 |
1st half: LAM 24, HCU 29 (HCU by 5). The model had LAM by 1.2 and a total of 63.0 (actual 53).
Team stats
| LAM | HCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-64 33% | Field goals | 26-49 53% |
| 4-22 18% | 3-pointers | 5-16 31% |
| 7-13 54% | Free throws | 18-24 75% |
| 35 17 off | Rebounds | 36 8 off |
| 9 | Assists | 16 |
| 9 | Steals | 11 |
| 4 | Blocks | 5 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 17 | Fouls | 13 |
| 32 | Points in paint | 40 |
| 2 | Fast-break points | 11 |
Players
| LAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rob Lee Jr. G | 34 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 6-19 | 3-11 |
| Cody Pennebaker G | 31 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-2 |
| Andrew Holifield F | 31 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-2 |
| Braden East F | 30 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 7-12 | 0-2 |
| Errol White F | 20 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0-6 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Eian Lowe G | 25 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| King-Njhsanni Wilhite G | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-1 |
| Janko Bulajic C | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| B.B. Knight G | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
| Jayden Gambrell G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Jayden Barrs, Quinton Sanders, Christian Thomas, Spencer Ezewiro, Izuchukwu Emelife
| HCU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kylin Green G | 37 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 4-9 | 1-2 |
| Ryan Bartley G | 37 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 6-12 | 2-6 |
| Trent Johnson F | 33 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 2-3 |
| Mambourou Mara F | 31 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-2 |
| Demarco Bethea F | 29 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 6-10 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| D'Aundre Samuels G | 27 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 3-6 | 0-2 |
| Caleb Gaston F | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Ahjany Lee F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bryson Monroe G | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Obadiah Curtis, Will Wilson, Nehikhare Igiehon, Brennen Byrd, Elijah Brooks, Demari Williams
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketLAM -2.5
ModelLAM -1.8
Model edgeHCU +0.7
W HCU covered
Total
Market132.5
Model134.4
Model edgeOver 1.9
L Under
Projected score
LAM 68.1 · HCU 66.3
LAM 53 · HCU 75
Win probability
LAM 56%
1st half
Spread
LAM -1.2
HCU -5.0
Total
63.0
53 points
Projected score
LAM 32.1 · HCU 30.9
LAM 24 · HCU 29
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLAM -1.5
1 → LAM
CloseLAM -2.5
1 pt toward LAM
Total
Open131.5
▲ 1
Close132.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
LAM -135 · HCU +114
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LAM -1.5 · closed LAM -2.5 · moved 1 toward LAMmodel LAM -2
model LAM -2
Opened 131.5 · closed 132.5 · moved 1 upmodel 134.5
model 134.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 7 since 2021-22
LAM 5–2 HCULAM leads · 7 games since 2021-22 · LAM has won the last 4 meetings · LAM 2-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2025-26 | HCU 56 @ LAM 64 | LAM -8.5 | HCU W |
| Feb 22, 2024-25 | LAM 66 @ HCU 58 | HCU +1.5 | LAM W |
| Jan 4, 2024-25 | HCU 61 @ LAM 63 | LAM -9.5 | HCU W |
| Mar 6, 2023-24 | HCU 68 @ LAM 78 | LAM -16.5 | HCU W |
| Jan 20, 2023-24 | LAM 77 @ HCU 78 | HCU +7.5 | HCU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lamar
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
12-16
43% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ | L 65-78 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 79-66 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 68-63 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 68-83 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 65-55 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 49-57 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 71-89 | +17.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 72-83 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 82-85 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 76-61 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 69-62 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 70-82 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 52-60 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 63-51 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 64-56 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 90-80 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 76-89 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 81-88 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 82-61 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 63-64 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 73-54 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-84 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 68-70 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 135.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-76 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 65-70 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 71-77 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 23 | vs | L 52-53 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 60-72 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@
TCU
L 65-78
+5.5
17
@
ULM
W 79-66
+1.5
23
@
MONT
W 68-63
+9.5
24
vs
OAK
L 68-83
−11.5
3
vs
UL
W 65-55
−0.5
6
vs
AMCC
L 49-57
−11.5
10
@
SDSU
L 71-89
−0.5
16
vs
RGV
L 72-83
−14.5
20
vs
OMA
L 82-85
−8.5
29
@
NWST
W 76-61
+11.5
31
@
ETAM
W 69-62
+1.5
2
@
MCN
L 70-82
+4.5
5
@
SELA
L 52-60
−9.5
10
vs
UIW
W 63-51
+10.5
12
vs
HCU
W 64-56
−0.5
17
@
NICH
W 90-80
+13.5
19
@
NOLA
L 76-89
−14.5
24
vs
SFA
L 81-88
−2.5
27
vs
ETAM
W 82-61
+14.5
31
vs
MCN
L 63-64
+9.5
2
vs
SELA
W 73-54
+13.5
7
@
SFA
L 74-84
−1.5
9
vs
NWST
L 68-70
−8.5
14
@
AMCC
L 63-76
−10.5
16
@
RGV
L 65-70
+1.5
21
vs
NOLA
L 71-77
−10.5
23
vs
NICH
L 52-53
−4.5
28
@
UIW
L 60-72
−10.5
covered 12didn’t cover 16avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@
TCU
L 65-78
−4.5
17
@
ULM
W 79-66
+4.5
23
@
MONT
W 68-63
−17.5
24
vs
OAK
L 68-83
+2.5
3
vs
UL
W 65-55
−9.5
6
vs
AMCC
L 49-57
−30.5
10
@
SDSU
L 71-89
+24.5
16
vs
RGV
L 72-83
+15.5
20
vs
OMA
L 82-85
+25.5
29
@
NWST
W 76-61
−1.5
31
@
ETAM
W 69-62
−12.5
2
@
MCN
L 70-82
+6.5
5
@
SELA
L 52-60
−23.5
10
vs
UIW
W 63-51
−26.5
12
vs
HCU
W 64-56
−14.5
17
@
NICH
W 90-80
+30.5
19
@
NOLA
L 76-89
+20.5
24
vs
SFA
L 81-88
+32.5
27
vs
ETAM
W 82-61
+2.5
31
vs
MCN
L 63-64
−17.5
2
vs
SELA
W 73-54
−5.5
7
@
SFA
L 74-84
+19.5
9
vs
NWST
L 68-70
+2.5
14
@
AMCC
L 63-76
+3.5
16
@
RGV
L 65-70
−6.5
21
vs
NOLA
L 71-77
+1.5
23
vs
NICH
L 52-53
−38.5
28
@
UIW
L 60-72
−6.5
over 14under 14avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Hou Christian
28 games played
Straight up
9-19
32% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 60-78 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 72-61 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 69-74 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 72-65 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 62-80 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 75-77 | +11.5 | W +9.5 | 127.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 85-76 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 71-74 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 132.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 68-78 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 64-79 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 61-89 | +35.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 56-73 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 65-81 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 132.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 67-85 | +12.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 56-64 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 81-70 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 82-80 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 51-68 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 81-75 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-73 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 57-74 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-55 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 102 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 69-73 | +21.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 61-60 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 72-68 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 53-71 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 23 | @ | W 69-68 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 56-77 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
UCSD
L 60-78
−10.5
13
vs
ULM
W 72-61
+2.5
25
@
BELL
L 69-74
−7.5
26
@
CIT
W 72-65
+5.5
29
@
GASO
L 62-80
−10.5
2
@
UNT
L 75-77
+9.5
6
@
NOLA
W 85-76
+13.5
13
vs
SELA
L 71-74
−5.5
15
vs
MCN
L 68-78
+4.5
17
@
NICH
L 64-79
−11.5
29
@
ISU
L 61-89
+7.5
3
@
UIW
L 56-73
−10.5
5
vs
AMCC
L 65-81
−12.5
10
@
SFA
L 67-85
−5.5
12
@
LAM
L 56-64
+0.5
17
vs
ETAM
W 81-70
+8.5
19
vs
NWST
W 82-80
−0.5
24
vs
RGV
L 51-68
−14.5
27
vs
UIW
W 81-75
+7.5
31
@
AMCC
L 71-73
+5.5
2
@
RGV
L 57-74
−7.5
7
@
SELA
L 47-55
−3.5
9
@
MCN
L 69-73
+17.5
14
vs
NOLA
W 61-60
−0.5
16
vs
NICH
W 72-68
+2.5
21
@
NWST
L 53-71
−15.5
23
@
ETAM
W 69-68
+3.5
28
vs
SFA
L 56-77
−12.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
UCSD
L 60-78
−3.5
13
vs
ULM
W 72-61
−10.5
25
@
BELL
L 69-74
−1.5
26
@
CIT
W 72-65
−0.5
29
@
GASO
L 62-80
−6.5
2
@
UNT
L 75-77
+24.5
6
@
NOLA
W 85-76
+20.5
13
vs
SELA
L 71-74
+12.5
15
vs
MCN
L 68-78
+8.5
17
@
NICH
L 64-79
+5.5
29
@
ISU
L 61-89
+4.5
3
@
UIW
L 56-73
−12.5
5
vs
AMCC
L 65-81
+13.5
10
@
SFA
L 67-85
+14.5
12
@
LAM
L 56-64
−14.5
17
vs
ETAM
W 81-70
+11.5
19
vs
NWST
W 82-80
+22.5
24
vs
RGV
L 51-68
−21.5
27
vs
UIW
W 81-75
+15.5
31
@
AMCC
L 71-73
+8.5
2
@
RGV
L 57-74
−10.5
7
@
SELA
L 47-55
−31.5
9
@
MCN
L 69-73
+4.5
14
vs
NOLA
W 61-60
−27.5
16
vs
NICH
W 72-68
+3.5
21
@
NWST
L 53-71
−10.5
23
@
ETAM
W 69-68
−1.5
28
vs
SFA
L 56-77
−5.5
over 14under 14avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Lamar
10-18 overall · 7-14 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Incarnate Word60–72
- Lvs Nicholls52–53
- Lvs LSU N Orleans71–77
- L@ UT Rio Grande65–70
- L@ Texas A&M-CC63–76
2 days since their last game.
Hou Christian
9-19 overall · 7-14 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SF Austin56–77
- W@ East Texas A&M69–68
- L@ N'Western St53–71
- Wvs Nicholls72–68
- Wvs LSU N Orleans61–60
2 days since their last game.