UTRGV Fieldhouse · at UT Rio Grande · Conference game
Closing line
RGV -10.5✓ ETAM covered by 2.5
RGV -10.5✓ ETAM covered by 2.5Closing total146.5Under by 28.5
 ETAM | This season | RGV |
|---|---|---|
| 9-19 | Record | 14-13 |
| 13-15 | ATS | 15-12 |
| 14-14 | O/U | 11-16 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ETAM 67–77 RGV · ✓ RGV (82%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETAM | 34 | 21 | 55 |
| RGV | 24 | 39 | 63 |
1st half: ETAM 34, RGV 24 (ETAM by 10). The model had RGV by 6.0 and a total of 67.4 (actual 58).
Team stats
| ETAM | RGV | |
|---|---|---|
| 18-55 33% | Field goals | 22-51 43% |
| 6-28 21% | 3-pointers | 7-21 33% |
| 13-19 68% | Free throws | 12-15 80% |
| 35 12 off | Rebounds | 38 9 off |
| 13 | Assists | 13 |
| 6 | Steals | 1 |
| 1 | Blocks | 3 |
| 4 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 13 | Fouls | 15 |
| 22 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 2 |
Players
| ETAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianni Hunt G | 37 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 2-14 | 0-7 |
| Noah Pagotto F | 36 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 8-12 | 2-4 |
| Ronnie Harrison F | 35 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 3-11 | 0-4 |
| Damian Garcia G | 32 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1-11 | 1-7 |
| Tay Mosher F | 21 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Evan Phelps G | 15 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Josh Taylor F | 14 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2-2 | 1-1 |
| Vinny Sigona G | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Kamren Robinson, Michael Folarin, Alex McCray, Parker Whisenhunt, Kollin Tolbert, Chris Adlam, Mykol Sanchez-Vega, London Fields
| RGV | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marvin McGhee III G | 35 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 2-6 | 2-6 |
| Julien Gomez G | 33 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-5 |
| Jaylen Washington Jr. G | 33 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 4-9 | 0-1 |
| Koree Cotton G | 31 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-4 |
| Filip Brankovic F | 28 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 5-10 | 1-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Dane Christensen F | 15 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| Kwo Agwa F | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Always Wright G | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Zae Blake G | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Demarris Winters G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jalen Ricks, Luis Ramirez, Marshal Destremau, Mustafo Vanjov, Kye Dickson
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketRGV -10.5
ModelRGV -10.3
Model edgeETAM +0.2
W ETAM covered
Total
Market146.5
Model144.1
Model edgeUnder 2.4
W Under
Projected score
ETAM 66.9 · RGV 77.2
ETAM 55 · RGV 63
Win probability
RGV 82%
1st half
Spread
RGV -6.0
ETAM -10.0
Total
67.4
58 points
Projected score
ETAM 30.7 · RGV 36.7
ETAM 34 · RGV 24
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenRGV -9.5
1 → RGV
CloseRGV -10.5
1 pt toward RGV
Total
Open145.5
▲ 1
Close146.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
ETAM +440 · RGV -600
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened RGV -9.5 · closed RGV -10.5 · moved 1 toward RGVmodel RGV -10.5 matches the line
model RGV -10.5 = line ✓
Opened 145.5 · closed 146.5 · moved 1 upmodel 144
model 144
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETAM | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
| RGV | 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ETAM 1–1 RGVSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · ETAM 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2025-26 | RGV 69 @ ETAM 77 | ETAM +3.5 | ETAM W |
| Jan 13, 2024-25 | ETAM 55 @ RGV 57 | RGV -12.5 | ETAM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
East Texas A&M
28 games played
Straight up
9-19
32% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ UNM | L 54-76 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ HAW | L 74-100 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 14 | @ RICE | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | @ FDU | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs ARMY | W 84-67 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 5 | @ CONN | L 59-83 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs CARK | W 75-68 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 12 | @ MCN | L 66-102 | +20.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 15 | @ SELA | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ TA&M | L 77-118 | +28.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 29 | vs SFA | L 48-75 | +4.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 31 | vs LAM | L 62-69 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 3 | @ NICH | L 58-80 | +6.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 5 | @ NOLA | L 73-83 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vsRGV | W 77-69 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 12 | vs AMCC | L 50-61 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 17 | @ HCU | L 70-81 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 19 | @ UIW | W 80-58 | +6.5 | W +28.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 27 | @LAM | L 61-82 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 31 | vsNICH | L 68-72 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 2 | vsNOLA | L 85-94 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 4 | @ NWST | W 74-68 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 7 | vsNWST | W 52-48 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 100 |
| Feb 9 | @SFA | L 70-74 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 14 | vsMCN | L 54-97 | +13.5 | L −29.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 16 | vsSELA | W 70-53 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 136.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vsUIW | L 73-82 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 23 | vsHCU | L 68-69 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@UNM
UNML 54-76
+0.5
10
@HAW
HAWL 74-100
−7.5
14
@RICE
RICEL 64-71
+3.5
24
@FDU
FDUW 70-65
+1.5
25
vsARMY
ARMYW 84-67
+14.5
5
@CONN
CONNL 59-83
+12.5
7
vsCARK
CARKW 75-68
+4.5
12
@MCN
MCNL 66-102
−15.5
15
@SELA
SELAW 70-69
+5.5
21
@TA&M
TA&ML 77-118
−12.5
29
vsSFA
SFAL 48-75
−22.5
31
vsLAM
LAML 62-69
−1.5
3
@NICH
NICHL 58-80
−15.5
5
@NOLA
NOLAL 73-83
−3.5
10
vsRGV
RGVW 77-69
+11.5
12
vsAMCC
AMCCL 50-61
−7.5
17
@HCU
HCUL 70-81
−8.5
19
@UIW
UIWW 80-58
+28.5
27
@LAM
LAML 61-82
−14.5
31
vsNICH
NICHL 68-72
−5.5
2
vsNOLA
NOLAL 85-94
−7.5
4
@NWST
NWSTW 74-68
+9.5
7
vsNWST
NWSTW 52-48
+2.5
9
@SFA
SFAL 70-74
+12.5
14
vsMCN
MCNL 54-97
−29.5
16
vsSELA
SELAW 70-53
+14.5
21
vsUIW
UIWL 73-82
−12.5
23
vsHCU
HCUL 68-69
−3.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@UNM
UNML 54-76
−13.5
10
@HAW
HAWL 74-100
+28.5
14
@RICE
RICEL 64-71
−11.5
24
@FDU
FDUW 70-65
−14.5
25
vsARMY
ARMYW 84-67
+7.5
5
@CONN
CONNL 59-83
+0.5
7
vsCARK
CARKW 75-68
−2.5
12
@MCN
MCNL 66-102
+25.5
15
@SELA
SELAW 70-69
+1.5
21
@TA&M
TA&ML 77-118
+28.5
29
vsSFA
SFAL 48-75
−23.5
31
vsLAM
LAML 62-69
−12.5
3
@NICH
NICHL 58-80
−8.5
5
@NOLA
NOLAL 73-83
+5.5
10
vsRGV
RGVW 77-69
+0.5
12
vsAMCC
AMCCL 50-61
−31.5
17
@HCU
HCUL 70-81
+11.5
19
@UIW
UIWW 80-58
−4.5
27
@LAM
LAML 61-82
+2.5
31
vsNICH
NICHL 68-72
−6.5
2
vsNOLA
NOLAL 85-94
+27.5
4
@NWST
NWSTW 74-68
−1.5
7
vsNWST
NWSTW 52-48
−40.5
9
@SFA
SFAL 70-74
+0.5
14
vsMCN
MCNL 54-97
+8.5
16
vsSELA
SELAW 70-53
−13.5
21
vsUIW
UIWL 73-82
+9.5
23
vsHCU
HCUL 68-69
−1.5
over 14under 14avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
UT Rio Grande
27 games played
Straight up
14-13
52% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg +4.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-16
41% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ BAY | L 81-96 | +24.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 8 | @ SUU | W 95-72 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 11 | @ BOIS | L 65-85 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 22 | @ MOST | L 67-74 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | @ ILL | L 73-87 | +33.5 | W +19.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Dec 3 | @SFA | L 60-73 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 7 | vs APSU | W 63-50 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 11 | vs UTA | L 50-58 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 16 | @LAM | W 83-72 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 29 | vsNOLA | L 69-85 | -6.5 | L −22.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 31 | vsNICH | L 69-71 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vsAMCC | L 59-63 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 5 | vsUIW | W 80-67 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 10 | @ETAM | L 69-77 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 12 | @NWST | L 63-64 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | vsMCN | W 79-76 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 19 | vsSELA | W 68-65 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | @HCU | W 68-51 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 26 | @AMCC | W 64-55 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 135.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | @UIW | W 106-93 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | O 199 |
| Feb 2 | vsHCU | W 74-57 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 7 | @NOLA | W 95-76 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 9 | @NICH | W 92-72 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 14 | vsSFA | L 57-66 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 16 | vsLAM | W 70-65 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 21 | @SELA | W 96-75 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 23 | @MCN | L 68-75 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@BAY
BAYL 81-96
+9.5
8
@SUU
SUUW 95-72
+21.5
11
@BOIS
BOISL 65-85
−3.5
22
@MOST
MOSTL 67-74
−3.5
24
@ILL
ILLL 73-87
+19.5
3
@SFA
SFAL 60-73
−6.5
7
vsAPSU
APSUW 63-50
+10.5
11
vsUTA
UTAL 50-58
−12.5
16
@LAM
LAMW 83-72
+14.5
29
vsNOLA
NOLAL 69-85
−22.5
31
vsNICH
NICHL 69-71
−5.5
3
vsAMCC
AMCCL 59-63
−6.5
5
vsUIW
UIWW 80-67
+11.5
10
@ETAM
ETAML 69-77
−11.5
12
@NWST
NWSTL 63-64
−3.5
17
vsMCN
MCNW 79-76
+12.5
19
vsSELA
SELAW 68-65
−2.5
24
@HCU
HCUW 68-51
+14.5
26
@AMCC
AMCCW 64-55
+11.5
31
@UIW
UIWW 106-93
+11.5
2
vsHCU
HCUW 74-57
+7.5
7
@NOLA
NOLAW 95-76
+17.5
9
@NICH
NICHW 92-72
+16.5
14
vsSFA
SFAL 57-66
−7.5
16
vsLAM
LAMW 70-65
−1.5
21
@SELA
SELAW 96-75
+16.5
23
@MCN
MCNL 68-75
+4.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@BAY
BAYL 81-96
+22.5
8
@SUU
SUUW 95-72
+6.5
11
@BOIS
BOISL 65-85
−11.5
22
@MOST
MOSTL 67-74
−8.5
24
@ILL
ILLL 73-87
−4.5
3
@SFA
SFAL 60-73
−10.5
7
vsAPSU
APSUW 63-50
−38.5
11
vsUTA
UTAL 50-58
−37.5
16
@LAM
LAMW 83-72
+15.5
29
vsNOLA
NOLAL 69-85
+1.5
31
vsNICH
NICHL 69-71
−5.5
3
vsAMCC
AMCCL 59-63
−15.5
5
vsUIW
UIWW 80-67
+0.5
10
@ETAM
ETAML 69-77
+0.5
12
@NWST
NWSTL 63-64
−16.5
17
vsMCN
MCNW 79-76
+8.5
19
vsSELA
SELAW 68-65
−2.5
24
@HCU
HCUW 68-51
−21.5
26
@AMCC
AMCCW 64-55
−16.5
31
@UIW
UIWW 106-93
+58.5
2
vsHCU
HCUW 74-57
−10.5
7
@NOLA
NOLAW 95-76
+19.5
9
@NICH
NICHW 92-72
+16.5
14
vsSFA
SFAL 57-66
−21.5
16
vsLAM
LAMW 70-65
−6.5
21
@SELA
SELAW 96-75
+32.5
23
@MCN
MCNL 68-75
−3.5
over 11under 16avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
East Texas A&M
9-19 overall · 6-14 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hou Christian68–69
- Lvs Incarnate Word73–82
- Wvs SE Louisiana70–53
- Lvs McNeese54–97
- L@ SF Austin70–74
5 days since their last game.
UT Rio Grande
14-13 overall · 12-8 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ McNeese68–75
- W@ SE Louisiana96–75
- Wvs Lamar70–65
- Lvs SF Austin57–66
- W@ Nicholls92–72
5 days since their last game.