Burns Arena · at Utah Tech · Conference game
Closing line
UTU -2.5✓ UTU covered by 1.5
Closing total139.5Over by 26.5
| This season | UTU | |
|---|---|---|
| 10-14 | Record | 14-12 |
| 12-12 | ATS | 16-10 |
| 12-12 | O/U | 13-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ACU 70–72 UTU · ✓ UTU (59%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACU | 38 | 43 | 81 |
| UTU | 47 | 38 | 85 |
1st half: ACU 38, UTU 47 (UTU by 9). The model had UTU by 1.4 and a total of 66.6 (actual 85).
Team stats
| ACU | UTU | |
|---|---|---|
| 30-62 48% | Field goals | 33-54 61% |
| 7-22 32% | 3-pointers | 8-19 42% |
| 14-16 88% | Free throws | 11-15 73% |
| 26 6 off | Rebounds | 29 4 off |
| 15 | Assists | 17 |
| 7 | Steals | 4 |
| 0 | Blocks | 2 |
| 7 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 19 | Fouls | 14 |
| 44 | Points in paint | 42 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| ACU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradyn Hubbard F | 37 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 7-16 | 3-6 |
| Cbo Newton G | 33 | 27 | 1 | 2 | 11-18 | 4-9 |
| Rich Smith G | 29 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Yaniel Rivera G | 20 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 |
| Cade Hornecker F | 10 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Joseph Venzant G | 19 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Zy Wright G | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-3 |
| Christian Alston G | 17 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-1 |
| Ma'Shy Hill F | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Joseph Scott F | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Isaac Dye G | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Tylan Lewis, Isaiah Neyhart
| UTU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chance Trujillo G | 37 | 24 | 2 | 4 | 9-11 | 6-8 |
| Britton Berrett G | 37 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-3 |
| Ethan Potter F | 36 | 25 | 8 | 2 | 11-14 | 0-1 |
| Noah Bolanga G | 35 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 5-9 | 1-3 |
| Jusaun Holt G | 33 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 5-10 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Samuel Ariyibi F | 17 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| Dallin Grant F | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Preston Vandermyde G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Tanner Davis, Boston Harker, Madiba Owona, Hunter Schenck, Dario Domingos, Marvel Allen
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUTU -3.5
1 → ACU
CloseUTU -2.5
1 pt toward ACU
Total
Open140.5
▼ 1
Close139.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
ACU +120 · UTU -142
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UTU -3.5 · closed UTU -2.5 · moved 1 toward ACUmodel UTU -2.5 matches the line
model UTU -2.5 = line ✓
Opened 140.5 · closed 139.5 · moved 1 downmodel 142.5
model 142.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UTU -2.5 | UTU -2.6 | UTU +0.1 | W UTU covered |
| Total | 139.5 | 142.3 | Over 2.8 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | ACU 69.9 · UTU 72.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UTU -1.4 | UTU -9.0 |
| 1H total | 66.6 | 85 |
| 1H projected score | ACU 32.6 · UTU 34 | ACU 38 · UTU 47 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | |
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
ACU 7–2 UTUACU leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · UTU has won the last 2 meetings · ACU 7-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2025-26 | UTU 76 @ ACU 70 | ACU -3.5 | UTU W |
| Jan 1, 2025-26 | UTU 79 @ ACU 64 | ACU -5.5 | UTU W |
| Feb 22, 2024-25 | UTU 72 @ ACU 80 | ACU -6.5 | ACU W |
| Feb 6, 2024-25 | ACU 86 @ UTU 72 | UTU -2.5 | ACU W |
| Mar 2, 2023-24 | ACU 86 @ UTU 79 | UTU +1.5 | ACU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Abilene Chrstn
24 games played
Straight up
10-14
42% wins
Against the spread
12-12
50% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-12
50% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | vs | W 73-71 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 66-76 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 49-63 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | U 112 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 61-50 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 58-92 | -1.5 | L −35.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 71-63 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 77-69 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 131.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 62-96 | +34.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 67-85 | +33.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 75-68 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 64-79 | -5.5 | L −20.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 85-68 | +7.5 | W +24.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 84-80 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 72-82 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 134.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 58-74 | -1.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 52-74 | -3.5 | L −25.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 70-76 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 76-79 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 55-68 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 63-65 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 67-63 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 73-59 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 62-65 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-83 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
vs
OMA
W 73-71
−2.5
14
@
SFA
L 66-76
−3.5
18
@
TXST
L 49-63
−12.5
24
vs
UTSA
W 61-50
+8.5
25
vs
W&M
L 58-92
−35.5
2
@
PEPP
W 71-63
+6.5
6
vs
NMSU
W 77-69
+9.5
16
@
ARIZ
L 62-96
+0.5
19
@
BYU
L 67-85
+15.5
22
@
TXSO
W 75-68
+2.5
1
vs
UTU
L 64-79
−20.5
3
vs
UVU
W 85-68
+24.5
8
@
TAR
W 84-80
+8.5
10
@
UTA
L 72-82
−6.5
15
vs
CBU
L 58-74
−17.5
17
@
SUU
L 52-74
−25.5
29
vs
UTU
L 70-76
−9.5
31
vs
SUU
L 76-79
−9.5
5
@
UVU
L 55-68
+1.5
7
@
CBU
L 63-65
+6.5
12
vs
UTA
W 67-63
+2.5
14
vs
TAR
W 73-59
+10.5
16
@
TAR
L 62-65
−4.5
21
vs
SUU
W 87-83
−4.5
covered 12didn’t cover 12avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
vs
OMA
W 73-71
−6.5
14
@
SFA
L 66-76
−0.5
18
@
TXST
L 49-63
−26.5
24
vs
UTSA
W 61-50
−33.5
25
vs
W&M
L 58-92
+2.5
2
@
PEPP
W 71-63
−3.5
6
vs
NMSU
W 77-69
+14.5
16
@
ARIZ
L 62-96
+12.5
19
@
BYU
L 67-85
+5.5
22
@
TXSO
W 75-68
+4.5
1
vs
UTU
L 64-79
+3.5
3
vs
UVU
W 85-68
+13.5
8
@
TAR
W 84-80
+23.5
10
@
UTA
L 72-82
+19.5
15
vs
CBU
L 58-74
−8.5
17
@
SUU
L 52-74
−23.5
29
vs
UTU
L 70-76
+0.5
31
vs
SUU
L 76-79
+4.5
5
@
UVU
L 55-68
−22.5
7
@
CBU
L 63-65
−7.5
12
vs
UTA
W 67-63
−4.5
14
vs
TAR
W 73-59
−2.5
16
@
TAR
L 62-65
−7.5
21
vs
SUU
W 87-83
+26.5
over 12under 12avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Utah Tech
26 games played
Straight up
14-12
54% wins
Against the spread
16-10
62% covers · avg +2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-13
50% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 81-79 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 67-93 | +33.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 66-81 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 75-79 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 81-75 | -26.5 | L −20.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 62-68 | +16.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 63-68 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-90 | +20.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 82-80 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 69-92 | +19.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 80-66 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 79-64 | +5.5 | W +20.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 72-84 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 76-92 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 52-56 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 75-71 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 64-73 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 102-91 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 76-70 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 65-59 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 87-84 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 81-77 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 70-65 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 50-63 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 80-72 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SDAK
W 81-79
+3.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 67-93
+7.5
9
@
ASU
L 66-81
−2.5
12
vs
MAN
L 75-79
−6.5
14
vs
MVSU
W 81-75
−20.5
15
@
HAW
L 62-68
+10.5
25
vs
PRST
L 63-68
−3.5
29
vs
UCR
W 77-69
+2.5
3
@
SCU
L 80-90
+10.5
20
@
WEB
W 82-80
+7.5
22
@
CREI
L 69-92
−3.5
29
vs
SUU
W 80-66
+6.5
1
@
ACU
W 79-64
+20.5
8
@
CBU
L 72-84
−4.5
10
@
UVU
L 76-92
−2.5
15
vs
UTA
L 52-56
−5.5
17
vs
TAR
W 75-71
+0.5
21
@
CBU
L 64-73
−0.5
24
vs
SUU
W 102-91
+4.5
29
@
ACU
W 76-70
+9.5
31
@
TAR
W 65-59
+7.5
5
vs
UTA
W 87-84
+1.5
12
vs
UVU
W 81-77
+13.5
14
vs
CBU
W 70-65
+7.5
19
@
UTA
L 50-63
−8.5
21
@
TAR
W 80-72
+9.5
covered 16didn’t cover 10avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SDAK
W 81-79
−4.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 67-93
−2.5
9
@
ASU
L 66-81
−5.5
12
vs
MAN
L 75-79
−4.5
14
vs
MVSU
W 81-75
+10.5
15
@
HAW
L 62-68
−19.5
25
vs
PRST
L 63-68
−15.5
29
vs
UCR
W 77-69
+0.5
3
@
SCU
L 80-90
+25.5
20
@
WEB
W 82-80
+9.5
22
@
CREI
L 69-92
+13.5
29
vs
SUU
W 80-66
−2.5
1
@
ACU
W 79-64
+3.5
8
@
CBU
L 72-84
+11.5
10
@
UVU
L 76-92
+18.5
15
vs
UTA
L 52-56
−33.5
17
vs
TAR
W 75-71
−4.5
21
@
CBU
L 64-73
−6.5
24
vs
SUU
W 102-91
+43.5
29
@
ACU
W 76-70
+0.5
31
@
TAR
W 65-59
−25.5
5
vs
UTA
W 87-84
+31.5
12
vs
UVU
W 81-77
+9.5
14
vs
CBU
W 70-65
−8.5
19
@
UTA
L 50-63
−27.5
21
@
TAR
W 80-72
+11.5
over 13under 13avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Abilene Chrstn
10-14 overall · 5-9 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Southern Utah87–83
- L@ Tarleton St62–65
- Wvs Tarleton St73–59
- Wvs UT Arlington67–63
- L@ CA Baptist63–65
5 days since their last game.
Utah Tech
14-12 overall · 10-5 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Tarleton St80–72
- L@ UT Arlington50–63
- Wvs CA Baptist70–65
- Wvs Utah Valley81–77
- Wvs UT Arlington87–84
5 days since their last game.