crypto.com Arena · at Lakers · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 5-2 |
| 1-5 | ATS | 4-3 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 4-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LAL 124–112 · win probability LAL 81%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 236.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LAL has more of the edges
UTAH 1, LAL 7 · 2026-27 so far
LAL offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 4th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9; LAL 60.1 and allows 53.7
Context
Schedule so far
UTAH has played the 4th-hardest schedule, LAL the 16th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%; LAL hits 38.9% and allows 36.7%. Threes are 41.7% and 45.7% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UTAH 25.7%, LAL 26.8%. Defensive: UTAH 77.1%, LAL 67.4%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UTAH 17.0%, LAL 18.3%. Forced: UTAH 13.3%, LAL 17.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: UTAH 31.6, LAL 37.2. Allowed: UTAH 33.8, LAL 30.7
Recent form
Last 5: UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2; LAL 3-2 ATS, margin +1.4
Home court
LAL at home. This season: LAL 3-1 at home, UTAH 0-1 away
Even
UTAH offense vs LAL defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 17th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: UTAH plays 104.0 a game (12th fastest), LAL 102.9 (17th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UTAH 100%, LAL 100%. Transfers in: UTAH 0, LAL 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelLAL -12.3
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model236.4
Model edge—
Projected score
UTAH 112 · LAL 124.4
Win probability
LAL 81%
1st half
Spread
LAL -6.8
Total
118.1
Projected score
UTAH 55.7 · LAL 62.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% | |
| 5-2 71% | 4-3 57% | 4-3 57% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 19 since 2021-22
UTAH 5–14 LALLAL leads · 19 games since 2021-22 · LAL has won the last 5 meetings · UTAH 10-9 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2026-27 | LAL 132 @ UTAH 123 | UTAH +6.5 | LAL W |
| Apr 12, 2025-26 | UTAH 107 @ LAL 131 | LAL -14.5 | LAL W |
| Dec 18, 2025-26 | LAL 143 @ UTAH 135 | UTAH +9.5 | UTAH W |
| Nov 23, 2025-26 | LAL 108 @ UTAH 106 | UTAH +9.5 | UTAH W |
| Nov 18, 2025-26 | UTAH 126 @ LAL 140 | LAL -13.5 | LAL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Lakers
7 games played
Straight up
5-2
71% wins
Against the spread
4-3
57% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-3
57% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 | vs | W 127-105 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 233.5 | U 232 |
| Oct 23 | vs | W 125-117 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 225.5 | O 242 |
| Oct 25 | @ | W 132-123 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 237.5 | O 255 |
| Oct 27 | vs | L 129-136 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 234.5 | O 265 |
| Oct 28 | @ | W 103-87 | +1.5 | W +17.5 | 224.5 | U 190 |
| Oct 30 | @ | L 95-112 | -2.5 | L −19.5 | 234.5 | U 207 |
| Nov 1 | vs | W 131-125 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 224.5 | O 256 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
GS
W 127-105
+15.5
23
vs
LAC
W 125-117
−0.5
25
@
UTAH
W 132-123
+2.5
27
vs
POR
L 129-136
−8.5
28
@
LAC
W 103-87
+17.5
30
@
GS
L 95-112
−19.5
1
vs
TOR
W 131-125
+2.5
covered 4didn’t cover 3avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
GS
W 127-105
−1.5
23
vs
LAC
W 125-117
+16.5
25
@
UTAH
W 132-123
+17.5
27
vs
POR
L 129-136
+30.5
28
@
LAC
W 103-87
−34.5
30
@
GS
L 95-112
−27.5
1
vs
TOR
W 131-125
+31.5
over 4under 3avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Lakers has the better starters
Position by position: Jazz 1, Lakers 3, even 1
JazzBetterLakers
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
→LALBig
G A. Reaves23.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 82
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
→LALBig
G L. Doncic37.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 7.3 ast
Score 79
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
→LALSmall
G M. Thybulle9 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 50
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
←UTAHSmall
F J. LaRavia5.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 70
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
=Even
C W. Kessler14.3 pts · 9.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 42
JazzBetterLakers
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
=Even
LAL defense17th of 30 · -0.2
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
→LALBig
LAL offense4th of 30 · +3.2
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
→LALBig
Backcourt+24.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
←UTAHBig
Frontcourt+7.4 · 2 players
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
→LALBig
Bench+6.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUTAH betterLAL betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Guards
A. Reaves36 minL. Doncic36 minM. Thybulle25 minQ. Grimes27 minC. Sexton18 minJ. Hardy16 min
Forwards
J. LaRavia23 minS. Mamukelashvili24 minJ. Vanderbilt15 minK. Looney8 minA. KalumaNewA. OkerekeNew
Centers
W. Kessler31 min
Out
Z. WilliamsOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 108.7 #24 | Points per game | 120.3 #5 |
| 1.05 #25 | Points per possession | 1.18 #2 |
| 104.0 #12 | Pace (possessions) | 102.9 #17 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #24 | Effective FG% | 60.1 #1 |
| 32.6 #23 | 3-point % | 38.9 #4 |
| 41.7 #21 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.7 #9 |
| 31.6 #10 | Free throw rate | 37.2 #2 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.0 #25 | Turnover rate | 18.3 #28 |
| 25.7 #22 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.8 #19 |
| 26.2 #19 | Assists per game | 23.4 #27 |
| Defense | ||
| 118.8 #25 | Points allowed | 115.0 #17 |
| 1.14 #25 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #19 |
| 53.9 #18 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.7 #17 |
| 37.6 #25 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.7 #22 |
| 13.3 #28 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #4 |
| 77.1 #4 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.4 #29 |
| 6.2 #29 | Steals per game | 10.4 #4 |
| 6.5 #5 | Blocks per game | 6.7 #3 |
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.
Lakers
5-2 overall · 4-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Raptors131–125
- L@ Warriors95–112
- W@ Clippers103–87
- Lvs Trail Blazers129–136
- W@ Jazz132–123
A week or more of rest.