Gentile Arena · at Loyola Chicago · Conference game
Closing line
DUQ -5.5✓ DUQ covered by 6.5
Closing total152.5Under by 22.5
| This season | LUC | |
|---|---|---|
| 8-9 | Record | 5-15 |
| 7-10 | ATS | 5-15 |
| 12-5 | O/U | 11-9 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: DUQ 81–76 LUC · ✓ DUQ (69%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUQ | 34 | 37 | 71 |
| LUC | 28 | 31 | 59 |
1st half: DUQ 34, LUC 28 (DUQ by 6). The model had DUQ by 3.6 and a total of 73.4 (actual 62).
Team stats
| DUQ | LUC | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-53 43% | Field goals | 20-53 38% |
| 10-26 38% | 3-pointers | 5-26 19% |
| 15-22 68% | Free throws | 14-19 74% |
| 33 5 off | Rebounds | 32 6 off |
| 17 | Assists | 16 |
| 7 | Steals | 5 |
| 6 | Blocks | 4 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 20 | Fouls | 19 |
| 24 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 12 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| DUQ | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarence Guinyard G | 35 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 7-14 | 6-10 |
| Jimmie Williams G | 34 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 4-11 | 3-5 |
| David Dixon F | 28 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Jakub Necas F | 27 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-2 |
| Brandon Hall G | 20 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Maximus Edwards G | 15 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| Alex Williams F | 13 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| John Hugley IV F | 12 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Jake DiMichele G | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Cam Crawford G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Seamus McDermott, Ethan Anish, Lazar Milosevic, Frederik Jellum, Dom Aekins, Arness Lawson, Lucas Prolla, Stef van Bussel
| LUC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miles Rubin C | 32 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Nic Anderson G | 30 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-4 |
| Joshua Ola-Joseph F | 30 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-5 |
| Caleb Reese G | 26 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Xavier Amos F | 26 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 2-10 | 1-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Deywilk Tavarez G | 22 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 4-10 | 1-5 |
| Daniil Glazkov G | 21 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| Alexander Richardson C | 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Sam Yurasek G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Brayden Young F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Zachary Royster F | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
Did not play: Dominick Harris, Kayde Dotson, Chuck Love III, Kymany Houinsou, Justin Moore
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenDUQ -2.5
3 → DUQ
CloseDUQ -5.5
3 pts toward DUQ
Total
Open156.5
▼ 4
Close152.5
Down 4 since the open
Moneyline
DUQ -218 · LUC +180
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened DUQ -2.5 · closed DUQ -5.5 · moved 3 toward DUQmodel DUQ -6
model DUQ -6
Opened 156.5 · closed 152.5 · moved 4 downmodel 156.5
model 156.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | DUQ -5.5 | DUQ -5.8 | DUQ +0.3 | W DUQ covered |
| Total | 152.5 | 156.7 | Over 4.2 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | DUQ 81.3 · LUC 75.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DUQ -3.6 | DUQ -6.0 |
| 1H total | 73.4 | 62 |
| 1H projected score | DUQ 38.5 · LUC 34.9 | DUQ 34 · LUC 28 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
DUQ 2–1 LUCDUQ leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · DUQ 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | LUC 56 @ DUQ 69 | DUQ +1.5 | DUQ W |
| Jan 6, 2023-24 | DUQ 67 @ LUC 72 | LUC -0.5 | LUC W |
| Jan 25, 2022-23 | LUC 58 @ DUQ 72 | DUQ -7.5 | DUQ W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Duquesne
17 games played
Straight up
8-9
47% wins
Against the spread
7-10
41% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-5
71% overs · avg +8.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-63 | -17.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 92-80 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 87-81 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 77-87 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 92-78 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 86-93 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 79-83 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 170.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-75 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 64-86 | +14.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 103-59 | -19.5 | W +24.5 | 143.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 89-83 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 80-93 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 90-97 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 65-71 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-63 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 77-81 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+2.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
−0.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
−6.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+0.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
−0.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
−14.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−9.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
−0.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−7.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+2.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+24.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+8.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
−7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
−8.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−3.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
+9.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
+4.5
covered 7didn’t cover 10avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NIA
W 83-63
+6.5
7
vs
SHU
W 92-80
+14.5
11
vs
QUC
W 87-81
+5.5
15
@
VILL
L 77-87
+12.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 92-78
+19.5
22
vs
NE
L 86-93
+31.5
2
vs
W&M
L 79-83
−8.5
6
vs
STBK
W 84-75
+8.5
10
@
BOIS
L 64-86
−0.5
13
@
NEV
L 75-78
+1.5
22
vs
CAN
W 103-59
+18.5
30
@
DAV
W 89-83
+21.5
3
vs
VCU
L 80-93
+7.5
7
@
JOES
L 90-97
+37.5
13
vs
DAY
L 65-71
−16.5
17
@
FOR
W 74-63
−8.5
20
vs
SLU
L 77-81
−7.5
over 12under 5avg +8.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Loyola Chicago
20 games played
Straight up
5-15
25% wins
Against the spread
5-15
25% covers · avg −7.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-9
55% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 91-88 | -17.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 65-73 | -21.5 | L −29.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 62-64 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 74-95 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 67-80 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 59-76 | -13.5 | L −30.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 51-72 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 51-63 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 73-68 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 75-84 | -15.5 | L −24.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 71-85 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 80-78 | +15.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 61-57 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 68-70 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 64-79 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 66-101 | +14.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 74-82 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 51-78 | +16.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 70-84 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CLE
W 91-88
−14.5
6
vs
MERC
L 65-73
−29.5
9
vs
UNT
L 62-64
−3.5
13
@
WICH
L 74-95
−15.5
16
vs
CSU
L 67-80
−9.5
21
vs
NIU
L 59-76
−30.5
25
vs
UNI
L 51-72
−12.5
26
vs
SJSU
L 51-63
−10.5
2
vs
CMU
W 83-72
+4.5
6
vs
PRIN
W 73-68
−1.5
14
vs
CHST
L 75-84
−24.5
17
@
SF
L 71-85
−2.5
20
vs
SCU
W 80-78
+17.5
31
@
URI
W 61-57
+13.5
3
vs
DAY
L 68-70
+5.5
7
vs
DAV
L 64-79
−13.5
10
@
GW
L 66-101
−20.5
13
vs
GMU
L 74-82
+3.5
16
@
DAY
L 51-78
−10.5
20
@
SBU
L 70-84
−3.5
covered 5didn’t cover 15avg −7.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CLE
W 91-88
+27.5
6
vs
MERC
L 65-73
−6.5
9
vs
UNT
L 62-64
−12.5
13
@
WICH
L 74-95
+15.5
16
vs
CSU
L 67-80
−4.5
21
vs
NIU
L 59-76
−13.5
25
vs
UNI
L 51-72
−11.5
26
vs
SJSU
L 51-63
−22.5
2
vs
CMU
W 83-72
+14.5
6
vs
PRIN
W 73-68
+4.5
14
vs
CHST
L 75-84
+18.5
17
@
SF
L 71-85
+12.5
20
vs
SCU
W 80-78
+6.5
31
@
URI
W 61-57
−27.5
3
vs
DAY
L 68-70
−2.5
7
vs
DAV
L 64-79
+6.5
10
@
GW
L 66-101
+12.5
13
vs
GMU
L 74-82
+15.5
16
@
DAY
L 51-78
−12.5
20
@
SBU
L 70-84
+6.5
over 11under 9avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Duquesne
8-9 overall · 2-4 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Saint Louis77–81
- W@ Fordham74–63
- Lvs Dayton65–71
- L@ Saint Joseph's90–97
- Lvs VCU80–93
4 days since their last game.
Loyola Chicago
5-15 overall · 1-6 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St Bonaventure70–84
- L@ Dayton51–78
- Lvs George Mason74–82
- L@ G Washington66–101
- Lvs Davidson64–79
4 days since their last game.