Dale E. and Sarah Ann Fowler Events Center · at CA Baptist · Conference game
Closing line
CBU -9.5✓ CBU covered by 29.5
Closing total136.5Under by 1.5
| This season | CBU | |
|---|---|---|
| 10-16 | Record | 21-8 |
| 13-13 | ATS | 15-14 |
| 14-12 | O/U | 10-19 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ACU 64–71 CBU · ✓ CBU (74%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACU | 19 | 29 | 48 |
| CBU | 49 | 38 | 87 |
1st half: ACU 19, CBU 49 (CBU by 30). The model had CBU by 4.2 and a total of 63.2 (actual 68).
Team stats
| ACU | CBU | |
|---|---|---|
| 14-42 33% | Field goals | 31-53 58% |
| 4-15 27% | 3-pointers | 7-15 47% |
| 16-30 53% | Free throws | 18-33 55% |
| 27 6 off | Rebounds | 38 9 off |
| 5 | Assists | 11 |
| 7 | Steals | 11 |
| 1 | Blocks | 4 |
| 21 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 25 | Fouls | 20 |
| 14 | Points in paint | 44 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 10 |
Players
| ACU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cbo Newton G | 28 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Rich Smith G | 21 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bradyn Hubbard F | 18 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 4-10 | 2-3 |
| Yaniel Rivera G | 17 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| Cade Hornecker F | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Joseph Venzant G | 21 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Christian Alston G | 16 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-2 |
| Joseph Scott F | 16 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Zy Wright G | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-3 |
| Isaac Dye G | 12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-5 |
| Tylan Lewis G | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Ma'Shy Hill F | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Isaiah Neyhart G | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| CBU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayden Jackson G | 25 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2-7 | 2-7 |
| Dominique Daniels Jr. G | 24 | 22 | 4 | 4 | 9-13 | 3-5 |
| Martel Williams G | 22 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-1 |
| Jonathan Griman F | 17 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| Bradey Henige F | 12 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Devon Malcolm G | 20 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Thomas Ndong F | 16 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Jordan Muller G | 16 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Miles Daniels G | 15 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-1 |
| Monty Bowser G | 12 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2-2 | 1-1 |
| Nate Garcia C | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Rene D'Amelio F | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Jalen Dollar G | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Chase Mayo Harmon, Mouhamadou Dioum, OJ Blankson
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketCBU -9.5
ModelCBU -7.2
Model edgeACU +2.3
L CBU covered
Total
Market136.5
Model135.0
Model edgeUnder 1.5
W Under
Projected score
ACU 63.9 · CBU 71.1
ACU 48 · CBU 87
Win probability
CBU 74%
1st half
Spread
CBU -4.2
CBU -30.0
Total
63.2
68 points
Projected score
ACU 29.5 · CBU 33.7
ACU 19 · CBU 49
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCBU -9.5
no move
CloseCBU -9.5
No change since the open
Total
Open136.5
no move
Close136.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
ACU +370 · CBU -485
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CBU -9.5 · unchangedmodel CBU -7
model CBU -7
Opened 136.5 · unchangedmodel 135
model 135
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
ACU 3–6 CBUCBU leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · CBU has won the last 4 meetings · ACU 3-5-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2025-26 | ACU 63 @ CBU 65 | CBU -8.5 | ACU W |
| Jan 15, 2025-26 | CBU 74 @ ACU 58 | ACU -1.5 | CBU W |
| Jan 30, 2024-25 | ACU 60 @ CBU 83 | CBU -7.5 | CBU W |
| Jan 18, 2024-25 | CBU 60 @ ACU 54 | ACU +1.5 | CBU W |
| Feb 22, 2023-24 | CBU 65 @ ACU 71 | ACU -2.5 | ACU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Abilene Chrstn
26 games played
Straight up
10-16
38% wins
Against the spread
13-13
50% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | vs | W 73-71 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 66-76 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 49-63 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | U 112 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 61-50 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 58-92 | -1.5 | L −35.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 71-63 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 77-69 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 131.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 62-96 | +34.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 67-85 | +33.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 75-68 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 64-79 | -5.5 | L −20.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 85-68 | +7.5 | W +24.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 84-80 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 72-82 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 134.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 58-74 | -1.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 52-74 | -3.5 | L −25.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 70-76 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 76-79 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 55-68 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 63-65 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 67-63 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 73-59 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 62-65 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-83 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 81-85 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-74 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
vs
OMA
W 73-71
−2.5
14
@
SFA
L 66-76
−3.5
18
@
TXST
L 49-63
−12.5
24
vs
UTSA
W 61-50
+8.5
25
vs
W&M
L 58-92
−35.5
2
@
PEPP
W 71-63
+6.5
6
vs
NMSU
W 77-69
+9.5
16
@
ARIZ
L 62-96
+0.5
19
@
BYU
L 67-85
+15.5
22
@
TXSO
W 75-68
+2.5
1
vs
UTU
L 64-79
−20.5
3
vs
UVU
W 85-68
+24.5
8
@
TAR
W 84-80
+8.5
10
@
UTA
L 72-82
−6.5
15
vs
CBU
L 58-74
−17.5
17
@
SUU
L 52-74
−25.5
29
vs
UTU
L 70-76
−9.5
31
vs
SUU
L 76-79
−9.5
5
@
UVU
L 55-68
+1.5
7
@
CBU
L 63-65
+6.5
12
vs
UTA
W 67-63
+2.5
14
vs
TAR
W 73-59
+10.5
16
@
TAR
L 62-65
−4.5
21
vs
SUU
W 87-83
−4.5
26
@
UTU
L 81-85
−1.5
28
@
UVU
L 67-74
+7.5
covered 13didn’t cover 13avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
vs
OMA
W 73-71
−6.5
14
@
SFA
L 66-76
−0.5
18
@
TXST
L 49-63
−26.5
24
vs
UTSA
W 61-50
−33.5
25
vs
W&M
L 58-92
+2.5
2
@
PEPP
W 71-63
−3.5
6
vs
NMSU
W 77-69
+14.5
16
@
ARIZ
L 62-96
+12.5
19
@
BYU
L 67-85
+5.5
22
@
TXSO
W 75-68
+4.5
1
vs
UTU
L 64-79
+3.5
3
vs
UVU
W 85-68
+13.5
8
@
TAR
W 84-80
+23.5
10
@
UTA
L 72-82
+19.5
15
vs
CBU
L 58-74
−8.5
17
@
SUU
L 52-74
−23.5
29
vs
UTU
L 70-76
+0.5
31
vs
SUU
L 76-79
+4.5
5
@
UVU
L 55-68
−22.5
7
@
CBU
L 63-65
−7.5
12
vs
UTA
W 67-63
−4.5
14
vs
TAR
W 73-59
−2.5
16
@
TAR
L 62-65
−7.5
21
vs
SUU
W 87-83
+26.5
26
@
UTU
L 81-85
+26.5
28
@
UVU
L 67-74
+0.5
over 14under 12avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
CA Baptist
29 games played
Straight up
21-8
72% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-19
34% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-75 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 69-61 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 69-59 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-57 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 72-59 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 76-61 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 75-69 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 1 | @ | L 70-78 | +13.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 60-91 | +18.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 85-91 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 12 | @ | W 88-83 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 75-67 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 74-67 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 66-73 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 51-63 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 84-72 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 58-55 | -14.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 74-58 | +1.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 73-64 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 78-71 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-77 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 56-55 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 65-63 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 83-66 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-70 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 46-65 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 68-56 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-67 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UPST
W 87-75
−2.5
7
@
UCI
W 69-61
+16.5
14
vs
WIU
W 69-59
−5.5
18
vs
UCR
W 80-57
+10.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 72-59
−1.5
25
vs
USD
W 76-61
+7.5
29
@
ORST
W 75-69
+7.5
1
@
COLO
L 70-78
+5.5
3
@
BYU
L 60-91
−12.5
6
@
UTAH
L 85-91
−0.5
12
@
EWU
W 88-83
+1.5
16
vs
SOU
W 75-67
−4.5
20
vs
SAC
W 74-67
−7.5
29
@
UVU
L 66-73
+0.5
1
@
UTA
L 51-63
−14.5
3
@
TAR
L 76-81
−3.5
8
vs
UTU
W 84-72
+4.5
10
vs
SUU
W 58-55
−11.5
15
@
ACU
W 74-58
+17.5
21
vs
UTU
W 73-64
+0.5
24
vs
UVU
W 78-71
+5.5
31
@
UTA
W 87-77
+8.5
5
vs
TAR
W 56-55
−9.5
7
vs
ACU
W 65-63
−6.5
12
@
SUU
W 83-66
+11.5
14
@
UTU
L 65-70
−7.5
19
@
UVU
L 46-65
−10.5
26
vs
UTA
W 68-56
+5.5
28
vs
TAR
W 82-67
+6.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UPST
W 87-75
+9.5
7
@
UCI
W 69-61
−17.5
14
vs
WIU
W 69-59
−12.5
18
vs
UCR
W 80-57
−5.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 72-59
−13.5
25
vs
USD
W 76-61
−9.5
29
@
ORST
W 75-69
+6.5
1
@
COLO
L 70-78
−2.5
3
@
BYU
L 60-91
−2.5
6
@
UTAH
L 85-91
+30.5
12
@
EWU
W 88-83
+17.5
16
vs
SOU
W 75-67
−13.5
20
vs
SAC
W 74-67
−17.5
29
@
UVU
L 66-73
−9.5
1
@
UTA
L 51-63
−20.5
3
@
TAR
L 76-81
+9.5
8
vs
UTU
W 84-72
+11.5
10
vs
SUU
W 58-55
−37.5
15
@
ACU
W 74-58
−8.5
21
vs
UTU
W 73-64
−6.5
24
vs
UVU
W 78-71
+1.5
31
@
UTA
W 87-77
+29.5
5
vs
TAR
W 56-55
−27.5
7
vs
ACU
W 65-63
−7.5
12
@
SUU
W 83-66
+1.5
14
@
UTU
L 65-70
−8.5
19
@
UVU
L 46-65
−31.5
26
vs
UTA
W 68-56
−10.5
28
vs
TAR
W 82-67
+9.5
over 10under 19avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Abilene Chrstn
10-16 overall · 5-11 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Utah Valley67–74
- L@ Utah Tech81–85
- Wvs Southern Utah87–83
- L@ Tarleton St62–65
- Wvs Tarleton St73–59
5 days since their last game.
CA Baptist
21-8 overall · 11-5 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Tarleton St82–67
- Wvs UT Arlington68–56
- L@ Utah Valley46–65
- L@ Utah Tech65–70
- W@ Southern Utah83–66
5 days since their last game.