Burns Arena · at Utah Tech · Conference game
Closing line
UTU -6.5✓ UTU covered by 4.5
UTU -6.5✓ UTU covered by 4.5Closing total149.5Over by 43.5
 SUU | This season | UTU |
|---|---|---|
| 4-13 | Record | 7-11 |
| 9-8 | ATS | 9-9 |
| 9-8 | O/U | 8-10 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SUU 73–78 UTU · ✓ UTU (68%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUU | 43 | 48 | 91 |
| UTU | 52 | 50 | 102 |
1st half: SUU 43, UTU 52 (UTU by 9). The model had UTU by 3.1 and a total of 70.8 (actual 95).
Team stats
| SUU | UTU | |
|---|---|---|
| 31-58 53% | Field goals | 39-72 54% |
| 5-14 36% | 3-pointers | 9-21 43% |
| 24-30 80% | Free throws | 15-20 75% |
| 32 9 off | Rebounds | 33 12 off |
| 14 | Assists | 25 |
| 2 | Steals | 6 |
| 4 | Blocks | 2 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 3 |
| 16 | Fouls | 22 |
| 42 | Points in paint | 46 |
| 14 | Fast-break points | 13 |
Players
| SUU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaiden Feroah F | 36 | 35 | 12 | 1 | 13-16 | 1-2 |
| Tanner Hayhurst G | 34 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| Dylan Jones G | 32 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 3-9 | 3-7 |
| Elijah Duval G | 31 | 28 | 7 | 8 | 8-17 | 1-2 |
| Isaiah Cottrell F | 30 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jalen Lee G | 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Lorenzo Abellar G | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Cale Barclay F | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Kai Burdick C | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Zeplin Kidd, Juok Riak, Brayden Johnson, Langston Binns, Zach Bell, Logan Stephens, Chuks Isitua
| UTU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jusaun Holt G | 35 | 10 | 3 | 12 | 3-13 | 1-3 |
| Ethan Potter F | 32 | 29 | 11 | 4 | 11-15 | 0-0 |
| Tanner Davis G | 32 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6-7 | 0-0 |
| Noah Bolanga G | 29 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-5 |
| Britton Berrett G | 26 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 5-7 | 4-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Chance Trujillo G | 32 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 7-13 | 3-7 |
| Samuel Ariyibi F | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Dario Domingos F | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Boston Harker, Hunter Schenck, Preston Vandermyde, Madiba Owona, Dallin Grant, Marvel Allen
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUTU -6.5
ModelUTU -5.5
Model edgeSUU +1.0
L UTU covered
Total
Market149.5
Model151.3
Model edgeOver 1.8
W Over
Projected score
SUU 72.9 · UTU 78.4
SUU 91 · UTU 102
Win probability
UTU 68%
1st half
Spread
UTU -3.1
UTU -9.0
Total
70.8
95 points
Projected score
SUU 33.9 · UTU 37
SUU 43 · UTU 52
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUTU -6.5
no move
CloseUTU -6.5
No change since the open
Total
Open146.5
▲ 3
Close149.5
Up 3 since the open
Moneyline
SUU +220 · UTU -270
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UTU -6.5 · unchangedmodel UTU -5.5
model UTU -5.5
Opened 146.5 · closed 149.5 · moved 3 upmodel 151.5
model 151.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUU | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
| UTU | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
SUU 6–5 UTUSUU leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · UTU has won the last 2 meetings · SUU 4-7 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2025-26 | SUU 66 @ UTU 80 | UTU -7.5 | UTU W |
| Mar 11, 2024-25 | UTU 72 vs SUU 65 | SUU +4.5 | UTU W |
| Feb 27, 2024-25 | SUU 82 @ UTU 75 | UTU -3.5 | SUU W |
| Feb 13, 2024-25 | UTU 74 @ SUU 76 | SUU -2.5 | UTU W |
| Feb 8, 2023-24 | SUU 68 @ UTU 70 | UTU +3.5 | UTU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Southern Utah
17 games played
Straight up
4-13
24% wins
Against the spread
9-8
53% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-8
53% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ ASU | L 64-81 | +17.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 8 | vs RGV | L 72-95 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 15 | @ OMA | L 85-90 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 17 | @ GONZ | L 50-122 | +35.5 | L −36.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 19 | @ WSU | L 74-98 | +12.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 28 | @ RMU | L 54-61 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 29 | vs STET | W 70-68 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 6 | @ ORST | L 70-81 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 13 | @ WASH | L 69-105 | +25.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 18 | @ NAU | L 57-65 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 29 | @UTU | L 66-80 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 3 | vs UTA | L 77-86 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | @ UVU | L 72-89 | +18.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | @ CBU | L 55-58 | +14.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 15 | vs TAR | W 106-105 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 17 | vs ACU | W 74-52 | +3.5 | W +25.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 21 | vsUVU | W 84-70 | +12.5 | W +26.5 | 160.5 | U 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@ASU
ASUL 64-81
+0.5
8
vsRGV
RGVL 72-95
−21.5
15
@OMA
OMAL 85-90
+3.5
17
@GONZ
GONZL 50-122
−36.5
19
@WSU
WSUL 74-98
−11.5
28
@RMU
RMUL 54-61
+1.5
29
vsSTET
STETW 70-68
+0.5
6
@ORST
ORSTL 70-81
−0.5
13
@WASH
WASHL 69-105
−10.5
18
@NAU
NAUL 57-65
−2.5
29
@UTU
UTUL 66-80
−6.5
3
vsUTA
UTAL 77-86
−3.5
8
@UVU
UVUL 72-89
+1.5
10
@CBU
CBUL 55-58
+11.5
15
vsTAR
TARW 106-105
+4.5
17
vsACU
ACUW 74-52
+25.5
21
vsUVU
UVUW 84-70
+26.5
covered 9didn’t cover 8avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@ASU
ASUL 64-81
−6.5
8
vsRGV
RGVL 72-95
+6.5
15
@OMA
OMAL 85-90
+21.5
17
@GONZ
GONZL 50-122
+11.5
19
@WSU
WSUL 74-98
+14.5
28
@RMU
RMUL 54-61
−37.5
29
vsSTET
STETW 70-68
−10.5
6
@ORST
ORSTL 70-81
+4.5
13
@WASH
WASHL 69-105
+20.5
18
@NAU
NAUL 57-65
−28.5
29
@UTU
UTUL 66-80
−2.5
3
vsUTA
UTAL 77-86
+24.5
8
@UVU
UVUL 72-89
+6.5
10
@CBU
CBUL 55-58
−37.5
15
vsTAR
TARW 106-105
+60.5
17
vsACU
ACUW 74-52
−23.5
21
vsUVU
UVUW 84-70
−6.5
over 9under 8avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Utah Tech
18 games played
Straight up
7-11
39% wins
Against the spread
9-9
50% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-10
44% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ SDAK | W 81-79 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 7 | @ ARIZ | L 67-93 | +33.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 9 | @ASU | L 66-81 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 12 | vs MAN | L 75-79 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 14 | vs MVSU | W 81-75 | -26.5 | L −20.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | @ HAW | L 62-68 | +16.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 25 | vs PRST | L 63-68 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 29 | vs UCR | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 3 | @ SCU | L 80-90 | +20.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | @ WEB | W 82-80 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 22 | @ CREI | L 69-92 | +19.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 29 | vsSUU | W 80-66 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 1 | @ACU | W 79-64 | +5.5 | W +20.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 8 | @CBU | L 72-84 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @UVU | L 76-92 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 15 | vsUTA | L 52-56 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 17 | vsTAR | W 75-71 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | @CBU | L 64-73 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@SDAK
SDAKW 81-79
+3.5
7
@ARIZ
ARIZL 67-93
+7.5
9
@ASU
ASUL 66-81
−2.5
12
vsMAN
MANL 75-79
−6.5
14
vsMVSU
MVSUW 81-75
−20.5
15
@HAW
HAWL 62-68
+10.5
25
vsPRST
PRSTL 63-68
−3.5
29
vsUCR
UCRW 77-69
+2.5
3
@SCU
SCUL 80-90
+10.5
20
@WEB
WEBW 82-80
+7.5
22
@CREI
CREIL 69-92
−3.5
29
vsSUU
SUUW 80-66
+6.5
1
@ACU
ACUW 79-64
+20.5
8
@CBU
CBUL 72-84
−4.5
10
@UVU
UVUL 76-92
−2.5
15
vsUTA
UTAL 52-56
−5.5
17
vsTAR
TARW 75-71
+0.5
21
@CBU
CBUL 64-73
−0.5
covered 9didn’t cover 9avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@SDAK
SDAKW 81-79
−4.5
7
@ARIZ
ARIZL 67-93
−2.5
9
@ASU
ASUL 66-81
−5.5
12
vsMAN
MANL 75-79
−4.5
14
vsMVSU
MVSUW 81-75
+10.5
15
@HAW
HAWL 62-68
−19.5
25
vsPRST
PRSTL 63-68
−15.5
29
vsUCR
UCRW 77-69
+0.5
3
@SCU
SCUL 80-90
+25.5
20
@WEB
WEBW 82-80
+9.5
22
@CREI
CREIL 69-92
+13.5
29
vsSUU
SUUW 80-66
−2.5
1
@ACU
ACUW 79-64
+3.5
8
@CBU
CBUL 72-84
+11.5
10
@UVU
UVUL 76-92
+18.5
15
vsUTA
UTAL 52-56
−33.5
17
vsTAR
TARW 75-71
−4.5
21
@CBU
CBUL 64-73
−6.5
over 8under 10avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Southern Utah
4-13 overall · 3-4 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Utah Valley84–70
- Wvs Abilene Chrstn74–52
- Wvs Tarleton St106–105
- L@ CA Baptist55–58
- L@ Utah Valley72–89
3 days since their last game.
Utah Tech
7-11 overall · 3-4 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ CA Baptist64–73
- Wvs Tarleton St75–71
- Lvs UT Arlington52–56
- L@ Utah Valley76–92
- L@ CA Baptist72–84
3 days since their last game.