Northeast ConferencePower #35411-17 SU16-12 ATS15-13 O/U
Wagner went 11-17 straight up, 16-12 against the spread (57% covers, average cover margin +1.9 points), 15-13 on over/unders in 2025-26, including 6-3 ATS as a favorite and 10-9 ATS as an underdog.
Last 5 (result · ATS · O/U):WWU·WWU·WWO·WWU·LLU
Cover margin by gameTotal margin by game
Points by which WAG beat (up) or missed (down) its closing linePoints the final score landed over (up) or under (down) the closing total
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers
Avg cover margin
+1.9
points vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs
Points for / against
69.6 / 72.7
per game
Wagner 2025-26 team stats
28 games · rank among 365 teams · a longer bar is a better rank
Scoring
Points per game69.6 #292
Points per possession1.05 #250
Pace (possessions)66.4 #299
Shooting
Effective FG%49.6 #262
3-point %36.6 #36
3-point attempt rate36.1 #249
Free throw rate32.4 #252
Possessions
Turnover rate18.6 #303
Offensive rebound rate32.8 #96
Assists per game11.9 #289
Defense
Points allowed72.7 #126
Points allowed per possession1.09 #208
Opponent effective FG%50.4 #123
Opponent 3-point %34.3 #202
Turnovers forced14.9 #295
Defensive rebound rate70.5 #139
Steals per game5.2 #321
Blocks per game2.3 #320
Wagner 2025-26 schedule, lines & results
28 played · 1 to go
| Date | Opponent | Line | Total | Result | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @  VCU non-conf | +25.5 | 133.5 | L 74-103 | L -3.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 7 | @  Seton Hall non-conf | +21.5 | 134.5 | L 61-68 | W +14.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 11 | @  Fordham non-conf | +12.5 | 139.5 | L 61-63 | W +10.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 16 | @  UMBC non-conf | +6.5 | 140.5 | L 70-71 | W +5.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 22 | @  Georgetown non-conf | +25.5 | 140.5 | L 75-92 | W +8.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 26 | @  Manhattan non-conf | +2.5 | 144.5 | W 103-101 | W +4.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 2 | @  Maryland non-conf | +22.5 | 143.5 | L 63-89 | L -3.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 17 |  MD Eastern non-conf | -4.5 | 131.5 | W 78-64 | W +9.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 2 | @  Chicago St | -1.5 | 146.5 | W 79-72 | W +5.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 4 |  Stonehill | -7.5 | 139.5 | L 60-69 | L -16.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 |  Saint Francis Red Wolves | -7.5 | 144.5 | L 69-71 | L -9.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 10 |  Mercyhurst | -1.5 | 132.5 | L 69-70 | L -2.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | @  New Haven | +1.5 | 129.5 | L 74-80 | L -4.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 19 | @  FDU | +2.5 | 137.5 | L 61-68 | L -4.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 23 | @  Le Moyne | +7.5 | 143.5 | L 67-69 | W +5.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 29 |  C Connecticut | +2.5 | 136.5 | L 55-62 | L -4.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 31 | FDU | -1.5 | 133.5 | W 75-72 | W +1.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 5 | Le Moyne | +1.5 | 138.5 | W 79-78 | W +2.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | @ C Connecticut | +5.5 | 136.5 | L 67-84 | L -11.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 12 |  Long Island | +6.5 | 135.5 | L 57-67 | L -3.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | @ Stonehill | +3.5 | 128.5 | W 68-57 | W +14.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 16 | @ Long Island | +10.5 | 138.5 | L 65-83 | L -7.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 19 | @ Mercyhurst | +3.5 | 133.5 | W 83-80 | W +6.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 21 | @ Saint Francis Red Wolves | -1.5 | 151.5 | W 65-56 | W +7.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 26 | New Haven | -2.5 | 131.5 | W 65-62 | W +0.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | Chicago St | -4.5 | 134.5 | W 80-61 | W +14.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 4 | @ C Connecticut | +3.5 | 139.5 | W 70-60 | W +13.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ Long Island | +6.5 | 138.5 | L 56-64 | L -1.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 26 | @ Long Island | +10.5 | 144.5 | — | — | — |
Wagner 2025-26 ATS and over/under splits
Home, away, favorite, underdog and conference
| Situation | SU | ATS | Cover % | Avg margin | O/U | PF | PA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All games | 11-17 | 16-12 | 57% | +1.9 | 15-13 | 69.6 | 72.7 |
| Home | 5-5 | 5-5 | 50% | -0.8 | 5-5 | 68.7 | 67.6 |
| Away | 6-12 | 11-7 | 61% | +3.3 | 10-8 | 70.1 | 75.6 |
| As favorite | 6-3 | 6-3 | 67% | +1.2 | 5-4 | 71.1 | 66.3 |
| As underdog | 5-14 | 10-9 | 53% | +2.2 | 10-9 | 68.9 | 75.7 |
| In conference | 9-11 | 10-10 | 50% | +0.3 | 9-11 | 68.2 | 69.3 |
| Non-conference | 2-6 | 6-2 | 75% | +5.8 | 6-2 | 73.1 | 81.4 |
How Wagner’s games played out
By the score at halftime
Led at halftime13 games · won 7 · covered 11
Trailed at halftime12 games · won 3 · covered 4
Tied at halftime3 games · won 1 · covered 1