Montagne Center · at Lamar · Conference game
Closing line
LAM -6.5✓ LAM covered by 14.5
Closing total140.5Over by 2.5
| This season | LAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-12 | Record | 8-10 |
| 9-9 | ATS | 8-10 |
| 9-9 | O/U | 9-9 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ETAM 66–73 LAM · ✓ LAM (74%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETAM | 33 | 28 | 61 |
| LAM | 35 | 47 | 82 |
1st half: ETAM 33, LAM 35 (LAM by 2). The model had LAM by 4.2 and a total of 65.3 (actual 68).
Team stats
| ETAM | LAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-64 36% | Field goals | 31-64 48% |
| 7-24 29% | 3-pointers | 11-24 46% |
| 8-17 47% | Free throws | 9-14 64% |
| 33 13 off | Rebounds | 49 16 off |
| 15 | Assists | 17 |
| 9 | Steals | 5 |
| 3 | Blocks | 9 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 12 | Fouls | 13 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 36 |
| 13 | Fast-break points | 3 |
Players
| ETAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianni Hunt G | 35 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 3-11 | 1-2 |
| Ronnie Harrison F | 35 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 5-15 | 0-4 |
| Damian Garcia G | 34 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 4-9 | 2-4 |
| Noah Pagotto F | 30 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2-9 | 0-2 |
| Tay Mosher F | 14 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Vinny Sigona G | 16 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 2-5 |
| London Fields G | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Michael Folarin F | 11 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Josh Taylor F | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Evan Phelps G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Chris Adlam, Kamren Robinson, Mykol Sanchez-Vega, Parker Whisenhunt, Alex McCray, Kollin Tolbert
| LAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cody Pennebaker G | 32 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Rob Lee Jr. G | 26 | 28 | 7 | 2 | 9-12 | 6-9 |
| Andrew Holifield F | 26 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 3-8 |
| King-Njhsanni Wilhite G | 21 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-2 |
| Braden East F | 19 | 12 | 11 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Eian Lowe G | 24 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-1 |
| Errol White F | 22 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Janko Bulajic C | 13 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Jayden Gambrell G | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-3 |
| Spencer Ezewiro F | 8 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Quinton Sanders, Jayden Barrs, Christian Thomas, B.B. Knight, Izuchukwu Emelife
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLAM -6.5
no move
CloseLAM -6.5
No change since the open
Total
Open139.5
▲ 1
Close140.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
ETAM +240 · LAM -298
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LAM -6.5 · unchangedmodel LAM -7
model LAM -7
Opened 139.5 · closed 140.5 · moved 1 upmodel 139.5
model 139.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | LAM -6.5 | LAM -7.2 | LAM +0.7 | W LAM covered |
| Total | 140.5 | 139.4 | Under 1.1 | L Over |
| Projected score | — | ETAM 66.1 · LAM 73.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LAM -4.2 | LAM -2.0 |
| 1H total | 65.3 | 68 |
| 1H projected score | ETAM 30.6 · LAM 34.8 | ETAM 33 · LAM 35 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 7 since 2021-22
ETAM 2–5 LAMLAM leads · 7 games since 2021-22 · LAM has won the last 5 meetings · ETAM 2-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2025-26 | LAM 69 @ ETAM 62 | ETAM +5.5 | LAM W |
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | LAM 65 @ ETAM 55 | ETAM +5.5 | LAM W |
| Jan 25, 2024-25 | ETAM 58 @ LAM 61 | LAM -9.5 | ETAM W |
| Mar 4, 2023-24 | LAM 70 @ ETAM 53 | ETAM +4.5 | LAM W |
| Jan 22, 2023-24 | ETAM 65 @ LAM 76 | LAM -5.5 | LAM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
East Texas A&M
18 games played
Straight up
6-12
33% wins
Against the spread
9-9
50% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-9
50% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 54-76 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 74-100 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 84-67 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 59-83 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 75-68 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 66-102 | +20.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 15 | @ | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 77-118 | +28.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 48-75 | +4.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 62-69 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 58-80 | +6.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 73-83 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 77-69 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 50-61 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 70-81 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 80-58 | +6.5 | W +28.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
UNM
L 54-76
+0.5
10
@
HAW
L 74-100
−7.5
14
@
RICE
L 64-71
+3.5
24
@
FDU
W 70-65
+1.5
25
vs
ARMY
W 84-67
+14.5
5
@
CONN
L 59-83
+12.5
7
vs
CARK
W 75-68
+4.5
12
@
MCN
L 66-102
−15.5
15
@
SELA
W 70-69
+5.5
21
@
TA&M
L 77-118
−12.5
29
vs
SFA
L 48-75
−22.5
31
vs
LAM
L 62-69
−1.5
3
@
NICH
L 58-80
−15.5
5
@
NOLA
L 73-83
−3.5
10
vs
RGV
W 77-69
+11.5
12
vs
AMCC
L 50-61
−7.5
17
@
HCU
L 70-81
−8.5
19
@
UIW
W 80-58
+28.5
covered 9didn’t cover 9avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
UNM
L 54-76
−13.5
10
@
HAW
L 74-100
+28.5
14
@
RICE
L 64-71
−11.5
24
@
FDU
W 70-65
−14.5
25
vs
ARMY
W 84-67
+7.5
5
@
CONN
L 59-83
+0.5
7
vs
CARK
W 75-68
−2.5
12
@
MCN
L 66-102
+25.5
15
@
SELA
W 70-69
+1.5
21
@
TA&M
L 77-118
+28.5
29
vs
SFA
L 48-75
−23.5
31
vs
LAM
L 62-69
−12.5
3
@
NICH
L 58-80
−8.5
5
@
NOLA
L 73-83
+5.5
10
vs
RGV
W 77-69
+0.5
12
vs
AMCC
L 50-61
−31.5
17
@
HCU
L 70-81
+11.5
19
@
UIW
W 80-58
−4.5
over 9under 9avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Lamar
18 games played
Straight up
8-10
44% wins
Against the spread
8-10
44% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-9
50% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ | L 65-78 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 79-66 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 68-63 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 68-83 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 65-55 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 49-57 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 71-89 | +17.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 72-83 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 82-85 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 76-61 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 69-62 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 70-82 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 52-60 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 63-51 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 64-56 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 90-80 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 76-89 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 81-88 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 169 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@
TCU
L 65-78
+5.5
17
@
ULM
W 79-66
+1.5
23
@
MONT
W 68-63
+9.5
24
vs
OAK
L 68-83
−11.5
3
vs
UL
W 65-55
−0.5
6
vs
AMCC
L 49-57
−11.5
10
@
SDSU
L 71-89
−0.5
16
vs
RGV
L 72-83
−14.5
20
vs
OMA
L 82-85
−8.5
29
@
NWST
W 76-61
+11.5
31
@
ETAM
W 69-62
+1.5
2
@
MCN
L 70-82
+4.5
5
@
SELA
L 52-60
−9.5
10
vs
UIW
W 63-51
+10.5
12
vs
HCU
W 64-56
−0.5
17
@
NICH
W 90-80
+13.5
19
@
NOLA
L 76-89
−14.5
24
vs
SFA
L 81-88
−2.5
covered 8didn’t cover 10avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@
TCU
L 65-78
−4.5
17
@
ULM
W 79-66
+4.5
23
@
MONT
W 68-63
−17.5
24
vs
OAK
L 68-83
+2.5
3
vs
UL
W 65-55
−9.5
6
vs
AMCC
L 49-57
−30.5
10
@
SDSU
L 71-89
+24.5
16
vs
RGV
L 72-83
+15.5
20
vs
OMA
L 82-85
+25.5
29
@
NWST
W 76-61
−1.5
31
@
ETAM
W 69-62
−12.5
2
@
MCN
L 70-82
+6.5
5
@
SELA
L 52-60
−23.5
10
vs
UIW
W 63-51
−26.5
12
vs
HCU
W 64-56
−14.5
17
@
NICH
W 90-80
+30.5
19
@
NOLA
L 76-89
+20.5
24
vs
SFA
L 81-88
+32.5
over 9under 9avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
East Texas A&M
6-12 overall · 3-7 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Incarnate Word80–58
- L@ Hou Christian70–81
- Lvs Texas A&M-CC50–61
- Wvs UT Rio Grande77–69
- L@ LSU N Orleans73–83
A week or more of rest.
Lamar
8-10 overall · 5-6 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SF Austin81–88
- L@ LSU N Orleans76–89
- W@ Nicholls90–80
- Wvs Hou Christian64–56
- Wvs Incarnate Word63–51
3 days since their last game.