Townsley Law Arena · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
SFA -6.5✓ AMCC covered by 4.5
Closing total135.5Under by 17.5
| This season | SFA | |
|---|---|---|
| 14-14 | Record | 25-4 |
| 15-13 | ATS | 22-7 |
| 14-14 | O/U | 12-17 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: AMCC 66–71 SFA · ✓ SFA (67%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMCC | 39 | 19 | 58 |
| SFA | 32 | 28 | 60 |
1st half: AMCC 39, SFA 32 (AMCC by 7). The model had SFA by 3.0 and a total of 64.3 (actual 71).
Team stats
| AMCC | SFA | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-45 49% | Field goals | 25-57 44% |
| 7-15 47% | 3-pointers | 5-16 31% |
| 7-10 70% | Free throws | 5-10 50% |
| 36 6 off | Rebounds | 25 6 off |
| 14 | Assists | 10 |
| 4 | Steals | 10 |
| 2 | Blocks | 4 |
| 17 | Turnovers | 6 |
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 30 |
| 3 | Fast-break points | 11 |
Players
| AMCC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheldon Williams F | 30 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| D'Avian Houston G | 29 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 6-8 | 1-3 |
| Cenker Evran F | 29 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-0 |
| Daniel Michelini-Jackson G | 28 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Nick Shogbonyo G | 28 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 6-12 | 3-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Franck Yetna F | 20 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| Mason Gibson G | 16 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Kam Parker G | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Leo Torbor G | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Kobi Pearson F | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jamal Ambrose, Cedric Horton, Trenton Pane, Jaden Haire, Bryson Wheatfall, Michael Oaks, Kayden Crosby
| SFA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keon Thompson G | 35 | 24 | 6 | 5 | 10-16 | 1-1 |
| Lateef Patrick Jr. G | 33 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 5-17 | 2-6 |
| Chrishawn Christmas G | 32 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Jerald Colonel F | 30 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Kam Burton G | 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Narit Chotikavanic G | 20 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-3 |
| Ahamed Mohammed G | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| Gediminas Alisas F | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Christian Green G | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Marcus Scurry G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Eltramon Smith, Tichyque Musaka, Yohan Gutierrez, Harris Dar, Bryceson Melvin
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketSFA -6.5
ModelSFA -5.2
Model edgeAMCC +1.3
W AMCC covered
Total
Market135.5
Model137.4
Model edgeOver 1.9
L Under
Projected score
AMCC 66.1 · SFA 71.3
AMCC 58 · SFA 60
Win probability
SFA 67%
1st half
Spread
SFA -3.0
AMCC -7.0
Total
64.3
71 points
Projected score
AMCC 30.7 · SFA 33.7
AMCC 39 · SFA 32
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSFA -6.5
no move
CloseSFA -6.5
No change since the open
Total
Open135.5
no move
Close135.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
AMCC +235 · SFA -290
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SFA -6.5 · unchangedmodel SFA -5
model SFA -5
Opened 135.5 · unchangedmodel 137.5
model 137.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 9-1 90% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
AMCC 1–3 SFASFA leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · SFA has won the last 3 meetings · AMCC 1-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2025-26 | SFA 78 @ AMCC 68 | AMCC +5.5 | SFA W |
| Dec 17, 2025-26 | AMCC 60 @ SFA 69 | SFA -6.5 | SFA W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | AMCC 64 @ SFA 78 | SFA +2.5 | SFA W |
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | SFA 48 @ AMCC 67 | AMCC -1.5 | AMCC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Texas A&M-CC
28 games played
Straight up
14-14
50% wins
Against the spread
15-13
54% covers · avg +1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 58-69 | +23.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 77-85 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 46-77 | +25.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 69-85 | +20.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 67-88 | +13.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 57-49 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 60-69 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 71-76 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 83-69 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 63-59 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 81-65 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 132.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 78-79 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 61-50 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 68-56 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 130.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 53-69 | +9.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-71 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 55-64 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 73-71 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 69-71 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 83-76 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 78-84 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 76-63 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 68-78 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-70 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 23 | @ | W 73-68 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 130.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-59 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 84-71 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 74-61 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
SMU
L 58-69
+12.5
8
@
TAR
L 77-85
−4.5
11
@
KU
L 46-77
−5.5
16
@
OKST
L 69-85
+4.5
28
@
XAV
L 67-88
−7.5
6
@
LAM
W 57-49
+11.5
17
@
SFA
L 60-69
−2.5
29
vs
NICH
L 71-76
−10.5
31
vs
NOLA
W 83-69
+9.5
3
@
RGV
W 63-59
+6.5
5
@
HCU
W 81-65
+12.5
10
@
NWST
L 78-79
−6.5
12
@
ETAM
W 61-50
+7.5
17
vs
SELA
W 68-56
+6.5
19
vs
MCN
L 53-69
−6.5
24
@
UIW
W 79-71
+9.5
26
vs
RGV
L 55-64
−11.5
31
vs
HCU
W 73-71
−5.5
2
vs
UIW
L 69-71
−6.5
7
@
NICH
W 83-76
+8.5
9
@
NOLA
L 78-84
−7.5
14
vs
LAM
W 76-63
+10.5
16
vs
SFA
L 68-78
−4.5
21
@
MCN
L 54-70
−1.5
23
@
SELA
W 73-68
+3.5
28
vs
NWST
W 71-59
+6.5
2
vs
ETAM
W 84-71
+5.5
9
vs
NOLA
W 74-61
+10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 13avg +1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
SMU
L 58-69
−33.5
8
@
TAR
L 77-85
+19.5
11
@
KU
L 46-77
−22.5
16
@
OKST
L 69-85
−0.5
28
@
XAV
L 67-88
+8.5
6
@
LAM
W 57-49
−30.5
17
@
SFA
L 60-69
−10.5
29
vs
NICH
L 71-76
+9.5
31
vs
NOLA
W 83-69
+9.5
3
@
RGV
W 63-59
−15.5
5
@
HCU
W 81-65
+13.5
10
@
NWST
L 78-79
+18.5
12
@
ETAM
W 61-50
−31.5
17
vs
SELA
W 68-56
−6.5
19
vs
MCN
L 53-69
−18.5
24
@
UIW
W 79-71
+13.5
26
vs
RGV
L 55-64
−16.5
31
vs
HCU
W 73-71
+8.5
2
vs
UIW
L 69-71
−0.5
7
@
NICH
W 83-76
+21.5
9
@
NOLA
L 78-84
+15.5
14
vs
LAM
W 76-63
+3.5
16
vs
SFA
L 68-78
+10.5
21
@
MCN
L 54-70
−15.5
23
@
SELA
W 73-68
+10.5
28
vs
NWST
W 71-59
−4.5
2
vs
ETAM
W 84-71
+18.5
9
vs
NOLA
W 74-61
−12.5
over 14under 14avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
SF Austin
29 games played
Straight up
25-4
86% wins
Against the spread
22-7
76% covers · avg +3.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-17
41% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 90-65 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 81-69 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 76-66 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 78-80 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 63-60 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 61-66 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 73-60 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 96-76 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 69-60 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 75-48 | -4.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 74-64 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-63 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 64-66 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 85-67 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 56-46 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 102 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-79 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 79-62 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-81 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 69-67 | -14.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 85-58 | -9.5 | W +17.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 67-60 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-74 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 74-70 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 66-57 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 78-68 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 81-78 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 23 | vs | L 73-77 | -11.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 77-56 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 76-68 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
ARST
W 90-65
+26.5
11
@
RICE
W 81-69
+14.5
14
vs
ACU
W 76-66
+3.5
18
@
FRES
L 78-80
−4.5
21
@
PEPP
W 63-60
+1.5
29
@
UTA
L 61-66
−3.5
3
vs
RGV
W 73-60
+6.5
7
vs
ULM
W 96-76
+0.5
17
vs
AMCC
W 69-60
+2.5
29
@
ETAM
W 75-48
+22.5
31
@
NWST
W 74-64
+1.5
3
@
SELA
W 73-63
+6.5
5
@
MCN
L 64-66
+8.5
10
vs
HCU
W 85-67
+5.5
12
vs
UIW
W 56-46
+2.5
17
@
NOLA
W 84-79
−1.5
19
@
NICH
W 79-62
+12.5
24
@
LAM
W 88-81
+2.5
27
vs
NWST
W 69-67
−12.5
31
vs
SELA
W 85-58
+17.5
2
vs
MCN
W 67-60
+9.5
7
vs
LAM
W 84-74
+1.5
9
vs
ETAM
W 74-70
−12.5
14
@
RGV
W 66-57
+7.5
16
@
AMCC
W 78-68
+4.5
21
vs
NICH
W 81-78
−9.5
23
vs
NOLA
L 73-77
−15.5
28
@
HCU
W 77-56
+12.5
2
@
UIW
W 76-68
+0.5
covered 22didn’t cover 7avg +3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
ARST
W 90-65
−0.5
11
@
RICE
W 81-69
+0.5
14
vs
ACU
W 76-66
−0.5
18
@
FRES
L 78-80
+11.5
21
@
PEPP
W 63-60
−25.5
29
@
UTA
L 61-66
−11.5
3
vs
RGV
W 73-60
−10.5
7
vs
ULM
W 96-76
+29.5
17
vs
AMCC
W 69-60
−10.5
29
@
ETAM
W 75-48
−23.5
31
@
NWST
W 74-64
−0.5
3
@
SELA
W 73-63
−1.5
5
@
MCN
L 64-66
−14.5
10
vs
HCU
W 85-67
+14.5
12
vs
UIW
W 56-46
−38.5
17
@
NOLA
W 84-79
+15.5
19
@
NICH
W 79-62
−3.5
24
@
LAM
W 88-81
+32.5
27
vs
NWST
W 69-67
−5.5
31
vs
SELA
W 85-58
+7.5
2
vs
MCN
W 67-60
−14.5
7
vs
LAM
W 84-74
+19.5
9
vs
ETAM
W 74-70
+0.5
14
@
RGV
W 66-57
−21.5
16
@
AMCC
W 78-68
+10.5
21
vs
NICH
W 81-78
+11.5
23
vs
NOLA
L 73-77
−3.5
28
@
HCU
W 77-56
−5.5
2
@
UIW
W 76-68
+1.5
over 12under 17avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas A&M-CC
14-14 overall · 14-9 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs LSU N Orleans74–61
- Wvs East Texas A&M84–71
- Wvs N'Western St71–59
- W@ SE Louisiana73–68
- L@ McNeese54–70
1 day since their last game.
SF Austin
25-4 overall · 20-2 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Incarnate Word76–68
- W@ Hou Christian77–56
- Lvs LSU N Orleans73–77
- Wvs Nicholls81–78
- W@ Texas A&M-CC78–68
A week or more of rest.