NIU Convocation Center · at N Illinois
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NIU | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-4 | Record | 2-4 |
| 4-2 | ATS | 4-2 |
| 4-2 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NIU 79–76 · win probability NIU 58%
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BELL has more of the edges
BELL 5, NIU 2 · 2025-26 so far
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BELL 22.4%, NIU 30.3%. Defensive: BELL 65.8%, NIU 70.0%
Shooting
Effective FG%: BELL 59.4 and allows 59.4; NIU 47.6 and allows 55.6
Three-pointers
BELL hits 38.1% and allows 40.4%; NIU hits 30.9% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 41.2% and 45.0% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BELL 15.4%, NIU 21.7%. Forced: BELL 15.1%, NIU 16.3%
BELL offense vs NIU defense
Offense 239th of 366 against a defense 327th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
BELL has played the 229th-hardest schedule, NIU the 167th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: BELL plays 66.7 a game (288th fastest), NIU 69.0 (181st). Faster games mean more points
Home court
NIU at home. This season: NIU 1-0 at home, BELL 1-3 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BELL 56%, NIU 30%. Transfers in: BELL 1, NIU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Recent form
Last 5: BELL 4-1 ATS, margin -5.0; NIU 3-2 ATS, margin -13.6
Even
NIU offense vs BELL defense
Offense 327th of 366 against a defense 345th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BELL 35.0, NIU 38.3. Allowed: BELL 34.3, NIU 38.3
Even
Rest
BELL 4 days since its last game, NIU 4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NIU -2.3 | — |
| Total | — | 154.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | BELL 76.2 · NIU 78.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NIU -1.3 | — |
| 1H total | 72.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | BELL 35.6 · NIU 36.9 | — |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-4 33% | 4-2 67% | 4-2 67% | |
| 2-4 33% | 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bellarmine
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
4-2
67% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-2
67% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
−21.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+1.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
−4.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+17.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
+8.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
+7.5
covered 4didn’t cover 2avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
+12.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+0.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
+23.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+14.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
−28.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
−1.5
over 4under 2avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
N Illinois
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
4-2
67% covers · avg +5.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
ULM
W 102-82
+12.5
7
@
WIS
L 72-97
+3.5
10
@
GCU
L 59-88
−6.5
18
@
UNI
L 57-70
+6.5
21
@
LUC
W 76-59
+30.5
25
@
APSU
L 59-77
−11.5
covered 4didn’t cover 2avg +5.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
ULM
W 102-82
+36.5
7
@
WIS
L 72-97
+11.5
10
@
GCU
L 59-88
−16.5
18
@
UNI
L 57-70
−19.5
21
@
LUC
W 76-59
−13.5
25
@
APSU
L 59-77
−11.5
over 2under 4avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
N Illinois has the better starters
Position by position: Bellarmine 0, N Illinois 1, even 4
BellarmineBetterN Illinois
G K. Goodin11.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
=Even
G M. Weisbrod TR11 pts · 2 reb · 8 ast
Score 27
G T. Doyle10 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 35
=Even
G T. Polite15 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 45
F S. Donald6.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
→NIUBig
G U. Buntyn TR12.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 52
F J. Wassler3.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 4
=Even
G D. Douglas TR12 pts · 4 reb · 0 ast
Score 9
F T. Tornatta TR3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 26
=Even
F T. Samuels7 pts · 8.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 33
BellarmineBetterN Illinois
BELL offense239th of 366 · -7.3
←BELLSmall
NIU defense327th of 366 · -8.5
BELL defense345th of 366 · -9.2
=Even
NIU offense327th of 366 · -10.6
Backcourt-3.8 · 2 players
←BELLSmall
Backcourt-5.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-4.9 · 3 players
→NIUBig
Frontcourt-1.4 · 1 player
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
←BELLSmall
Bench-3.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestBELL betterNIU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Goodin33 minT. Doyle28 minG. Whitaker7 minG. Neal3 minT. Clark2 minJ. GizziNew
Forwards
S. Donald27 minJ. Wassler12 minT. Tornatta9 min · TRA. McAfeeNewB. KlopfensteinNewE. HarrellNew
Guards
M. Weisbrod31 min · TRT. Polite31 minU. Buntyn31 min · TRD. Douglas30 min · TRN. Carter-SmithNewC. HardrickNew
Forwards
T. Samuels30 minM. Ivanauskas20 min · TRJ. Daugherty10 min · TRA. McBirney-Griffin10 min · TRB. GrossNew
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.9 #80 | Points per game | 66.3 #341 |
| 1.18 #34 | Points per possession | 0.96 #354 |
| 66.7 #288 | Pace (possessions) | 69.0 #181 |
| Shooting | ||
| 59.4 #3 | Effective FG% | 47.6 #324 |
| 38.1 #17 | 3-point % | 30.9 #323 |
| 41.2 #145 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.0 #66 |
| 35.0 #178 | Free throw rate | 38.3 #95 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #100 | Turnover rate | 21.7 #360 |
| 22.4 #354 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.3 #187 |
| 14.8 #98 | Assists per game | 11.6 #308 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.3 #350 | Points allowed | 78.9 #291 |
| 1.25 #365 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #323 |
| 59.4 #365 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.6 #342 |
| 40.4 #364 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.3 #315 |
| 15.1 #277 | Turnovers forced | 16.3 #199 |
| 65.8 #320 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #161 |
| 5.8 #255 | Steals per game | 5.6 #288 |
| 1.7 #356 | Blocks per game | 1.9 #352 |
Bellarmine
2-4 overall · 0-0 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Hou Christian74–69
- W@ The Citadel70–58
- L@ Notre Dame79–86
- Lvs Wofford86–94
- L@ Kansas St71–98
4 days since their last game.
N Illinois
2-4 overall · 0-0 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Austin Peay59–77
- W@ Loyola Chicago76–59
- L@ Northern Iowa57–70
- L@ Grand Canyon59–88
- L@ Wisconsin72–97
4 days since their last game.