M.A.C. Center · at Kent State
Closing line
KENT -3.5✓ TROY covered by 9.5
Closing total142.5Over by 57.5
| This season | KENT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: TROY 69–71 KENT · ✗ KENT (57%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TROY | 42 | 45 | 16 | 103 |
| KENT | 34 | 53 | 10 | 97 |
1st half: TROY 42, KENT 34 (TROY by 8). The model had KENT by 1.1 and a total of 65.6 (actual 76).
Team stats
| TROY | KENT | |
|---|---|---|
| 33-63 52% | Field goals | 30-79 38% |
| 12-26 46% | 3-pointers | 12-31 39% |
| 25-33 76% | Free throws | 25-33 76% |
| 34 6 off | Rebounds | 45 22 off |
| 20 | Assists | 17 |
| 8 | Steals | 5 |
| 3 | Blocks | 5 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 24 | Fouls | 23 |
| 40 | Points in paint | 30 |
| 13 | Fast-break points | 11 |
Players
| TROY | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper Campbell G | 38 | 19 | 6 | 8 | 6-10 | 3-5 |
| Theo Seng F | 37 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 6-10 | 2-5 |
| Thomas Dowd F | 36 | 19 | 13 | 3 | 7-14 | 2-5 |
| Victor Valdes F | 35 | 23 | 3 | 6 | 7-14 | 2-5 |
| Cobi Campbell G | 34 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Austin Cross G | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-3 |
| Kerrington Kiel F | 13 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Jerrell Bellamy C | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Corbin Green F | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Javen Colbert G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Emmanuel Clarton G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Hikaru Awata, Javier Gilgeous-Glasgow, Evan Griffin, Kameryn Mitchell
| KENT | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Safford G | 37 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 7-15 | 5-10 |
| Delrecco Gillespie F | 37 | 22 | 16 | 2 | 7-14 | 0-2 |
| Cian Medley G | 33 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2-12 | 0-2 |
| Jahari Williamson G | 13 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| Magnus Entenmann F | 11 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Rob Whaley Jr. F | 30 | 21 | 8 | 2 | 6-18 | 2-3 |
| Rayvon Griffith G | 23 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-5 |
| Quinn Woidke G | 19 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 3-8 | 2-6 |
| Omer Hamama G | 15 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Dezmon Briscoe F | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Dylan Lakatos, Jaymen Townsend, Landon Vanderwarker, Drew Huffman, Derrick Lee Jr., Dre Jones, Jamal Sumlin, Brenden Moss
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketKENT -3.5
ModelKENT -2.1
Model edgeTROY +1.4
W TROY covered
Total
Market142.5
Model140.1
Model edgeUnder 2.4
L Over
Projected score
TROY 69 · KENT 71.1
TROY 103 · KENT 97
Win probability
KENT 57%
1st half
Spread
KENT -1.1
TROY -8.0
Total
65.6
76 points
Projected score
TROY 32.3 · KENT 33.4
TROY 42 · KENT 34
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenKENT -3.5
no move
CloseKENT -3.5
No change since the open
Total
Open142.5
no move
Close142.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
TROY +140 · KENT -165
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened KENT -3.5 · unchangedmodel KENT -2
model KENT -2
Opened 142.5 · unchangedmodel 140
model 140
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TROY 1–0 KENTTROY leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · TROY 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2023-24 | KENT 68 @ TROY 78 | TROY -5.5 | TROY W |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Troy
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
20-12
63% covers · avg +1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 84-74 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 78-61 | -12.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 49-65 | +12.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 61-82 | +12.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 84-65 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 86-72 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 68-72 | -11.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 84-74 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 42-62 | +26.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | U 104 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 77-57 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 69-61 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 58-57 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 73-74 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 78-84 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 77-58 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 63-64 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 65-55 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 70-61 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 81-74 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 87-50 | -17.5 | W +19.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 61-64 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 62-69 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 74-56 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 71-70 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 69-72 | -15.5 | L −18.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 83-66 | -15.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 74-69 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 70-58 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 75-59 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 79-60 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 132.5 | O 139 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 94-81 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 57-76 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
TOL
W 84-74
+4.5
9
@
NOLA
W 78-61
+4.5
13
@
ARK
L 49-65
−3.5
17
@
ORE
L 61-82
−8.5
19
@
WGA
W 84-65
+4.5
25
vs
UTSA
W 86-72
+3.5
29
vs
MRMK
L 68-72
−15.5
1
vs
EKU
W 84-74
+1.5
10
@
HOU
L 42-62
+6.5
21
vs
GAST
W 77-57
+8.5
2
@
APP
W 69-61
+5.5
4
@
MRSH
W 58-57
−0.5
9
vs
TXST
L 73-74
−7.5
11
vs
ARST
L 78-84
−8.5
15
@
ULM
W 77-58
+6.5
18
@
USA
L 63-64
+2.5
25
vs
USA
W 65-55
+6.5
27
vs
USM
W 70-61
−2.5
30
vs
GASO
W 81-74
−2.5
1
vs
ULM
W 87-50
+19.5
5
@
JMU
L 61-64
−0.5
8
@
M-OH
L 62-69
−8.5
12
@
UL
W 74-56
+8.5
15
@
ARST
W 71-70
+7.5
20
vs
UL
L 69-72
−18.5
22
vs
CCU
W 83-66
+1.5
25
@
TXST
W 74-69
+3.5
28
@
USM
W 70-58
+2.5
8
vs
ODU
W 75-59
+4.5
9
vs
JMU
W 79-60
+17.5
10
vs
ARST
W 94-81
+15.5
21
vs
UK
L 57-76
−8.5
covered 20didn’t cover 12avg +1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
TOL
W 84-74
+3.5
9
@
NOLA
W 78-61
−12.5
13
@
ARK
L 49-65
−39.5
17
@
ORE
L 61-82
−3.5
19
@
WGA
W 84-65
+4.5
25
vs
UTSA
W 86-72
+6.5
29
vs
MRMK
L 68-72
+5.5
1
vs
EKU
W 84-74
+11.5
10
@
HOU
L 42-62
−28.5
21
vs
GAST
W 77-57
−13.5
2
@
APP
W 69-61
−2.5
4
@
MRSH
W 58-57
−28.5
9
vs
TXST
L 73-74
+10.5
11
vs
ARST
L 78-84
+17.5
15
@
ULM
W 77-58
−1.5
18
@
USA
L 63-64
−4.5
25
vs
USA
W 65-55
−12.5
27
vs
USM
W 70-61
−14.5
30
vs
GASO
W 81-74
+10.5
1
vs
ULM
W 87-50
−1.5
5
@
JMU
L 61-64
−10.5
8
@
M-OH
L 62-69
−9.5
12
@
UL
W 74-56
−7.5
15
@
ARST
W 71-70
−4.5
20
vs
UL
L 69-72
+3.5
22
vs
CCU
W 83-66
+13.5
25
@
TXST
W 74-69
+0.5
28
@
USM
W 70-58
−15.5
8
vs
ODU
W 75-59
+3.5
9
vs
JMU
W 79-60
+6.5
10
vs
ARST
W 94-81
+32.5
21
vs
UK
L 57-76
−18.5
over 14under 18avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kent State
34 games played
Straight up
22-12
65% wins
Against the spread
16-18
47% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-21
38% overs · avg −1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | W 70-66 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 56-79 | +22.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 76-73 | -13.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 68-52 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 65-54 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 131.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 39-51 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 90 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-60 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 76-57 | -13.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 15 | vs | W 82-57 | -17.5 | W +7.5 | 127.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 54-81 | +20.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 67-75 | -10.5 | L −18.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 68-50 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 68-49 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 83-94 | -12.5 | L −23.5 | 139.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 61-70 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-64 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-61 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 75-57 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 71-85 | -3.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 70-49 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 76-75 | -0.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 91-83 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 91-84 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 92-96 | +0.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 105-65 | -6.5 | W +33.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 72-77 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 77-76 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 76-70 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 73-66 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 64-72 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 75-56 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 23 | @ | W 77-75 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 26 | @ | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
UL
W 70-66
+1.5
13
@
AUB
L 56-79
−0.5
21
vs
NIA
W 76-73
−10.5
23
@
CLE
W 68-52
+13.5
28
vs
TOW
W 65-54
+9.5
29
vs
UCI
L 39-51
−6.5
30
vs
KENN
W 67-60
+1.5
6
vs
PORT
W 76-57
+5.5
15
vs
MERC
W 82-57
+7.5
22
@
ALA
L 54-81
−6.5
4
vs
BALL
L 67-75
−18.5
7
@
NIU
W 68-50
+5.5
10
@
BUF
W 68-49
+8.5
14
vs
WMU
L 83-94
−23.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 61-70
−14.5
21
@
TOL
W 83-64
+20.5
24
@
OHIO
L 59-61
−3.5
28
vs
BGSU
W 75-57
+5.5
31
vs
AKR
L 71-85
−17.5
4
@
EMU
W 70-49
+13.5
8
vs
ARST
W 76-75
+0.5
11
vs
CMU
W 91-83
−0.5
14
vs
OHIO
W 76-75
−3.5
18
@
BGSU
W 91-84
+0.5
21
@
M-OH
L 92-96
−3.5
25
vs
TOL
W 105-65
+33.5
28
@
AKR
L 72-77
−1.5
4
@
WMU
W 77-76
−6.5
7
vs
EMU
W 76-70
−5.5
13
vs
WMU
W 73-66
−3.5
14
vs
M-OH
L 64-72
−11.5
18
@
SBU
W 75-56
+23.5
23
@
STAN
W 77-75
+9.5
26
@
LUC
L 62-72
−4.5
covered 16didn’t cover 18avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
UL
W 70-66
−8.5
13
@
AUB
L 56-79
−13.5
21
vs
NIA
W 76-73
+11.5
23
@
CLE
W 68-52
−15.5
28
vs
TOW
W 65-54
−12.5
29
vs
UCI
L 39-51
−46.5
30
vs
KENN
W 67-60
−13.5
6
vs
PORT
W 76-57
−7.5
15
vs
MERC
W 82-57
+11.5
22
@
ALA
L 54-81
−18.5
4
vs
BALL
L 67-75
+4.5
7
@
NIU
W 68-50
−22.5
10
@
BUF
W 68-49
−30.5
14
vs
WMU
L 83-94
+37.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 61-70
−10.5
21
@
TOL
W 83-64
−1.5
24
@
OHIO
L 59-61
−23.5
28
vs
BGSU
W 75-57
−8.5
31
vs
AKR
L 71-85
+10.5
4
@
EMU
W 70-49
−23.5
8
vs
ARST
W 76-75
+9.5
11
vs
CMU
W 91-83
+38.5
14
vs
OHIO
W 76-75
+3.5
18
@
BGSU
W 91-84
+32.5
21
@
M-OH
L 92-96
+41.5
25
vs
TOL
W 105-65
+19.5
28
@
AKR
L 72-77
−7.5
4
@
WMU
W 77-76
+6.5
7
vs
EMU
W 76-70
−1.5
13
vs
WMU
W 73-66
−4.5
14
vs
M-OH
L 64-72
−10.5
18
@
SBU
W 75-56
−6.5
23
@
STAN
W 77-75
+9.5
26
@
LUC
L 62-72
−8.5
over 13under 21avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Troy
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
Kent State
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.