Gentile Arena · at Loyola Chicago
Closing line
LUC -17.5✓ CLE covered by 14.5
Closing total151.5Over by 27.5
| This season | LUC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CLE 64–77 LUC · ✓ LUC (87%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | 51 | 37 | 88 |
| LUC | 50 | 41 | 91 |
1st half: CLE 51, LUC 50 (CLE by 1). The model had LUC by 7.7 and a total of 65.8 (actual 101).
Team stats
| CLE | LUC | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-64 44% | Field goals | 29-66 44% |
| 11-30 37% | 3-pointers | 14-37 38% |
| 21-23 91% | Free throws | 19-25 76% |
| 47 18 off | Rebounds | 30 12 off |
| 18 | Assists | 21 |
| 2 | Steals | 6 |
| 4 | Blocks | 7 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 7 |
| 19 | Fouls | 19 |
| 22 | Points in paint | 30 |
| 11 | Fast-break points | 8 |
Players
| CLE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayan Nessah G | 31 | 25 | 11 | 2 | 8-13 | 1-2 |
| Tre Beard G | 30 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 3-5 | 2-3 |
| Foster Wonders G | 29 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-6 |
| Josiah Harris F | 29 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 8-20 | 2-7 |
| Jaidon Lipscomb G | 21 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1-5 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Chevalier Emery G | 17 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-5 |
| Preist Ryan F | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Kamari Jones G | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 3-4 | 3-3 |
| David Giddens G | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Ivan Spirov F | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Holden Pierre-Louis F | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Manny Hill, Waqo Tessema, Lucas Burton, Kevo St. Hilaire
| LUC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kayde Dotson G | 34 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 5-11 | 4-10 |
| Justin Moore G | 31 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 3-12 | 0-3 |
| Miles Rubin C | 28 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-0 |
| Kymany Houinsou G | 20 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 2-6 | 1-3 |
| Dominick Harris G | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Joshua Ola-Joseph F | 25 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Chuck Love III G | 21 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 3-7 |
| Deywilk Tavarez G | 14 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 5-7 | 5-7 |
| Alexander Richardson C | 12 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Daniil Glazkov G | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Zachary Royster, Brayden Young, Nic Anderson, Caleb Reese, Sam Yurasek, Xavier Amos
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketLUC -17.5
ModelLUC -12.9
Model edgeCLE +4.6
W CLE covered
Total
Market151.5
Model140.4
Model edgeUnder 11.1
L Over
Projected score
CLE 63.7 · LUC 76.6
CLE 88 · LUC 91
Win probability
LUC 87%
1st half
Spread
LUC -7.7
CLE -1.0
Total
65.8
101 points
Projected score
CLE 29 · LUC 36.7
CLE 51 · LUC 50
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLUC -14.5
3 → LUC
CloseLUC -17.5
3 pts toward LUC
Total
Open148.5
▲ 3
Close151.5
Up 3 since the open
Moneyline
CLE +900 · LUC -1800
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LUC -14.5 · closed LUC -17.5 · moved 3 toward LUCmodel LUC -13
model LUC -13
Opened 148.5 · closed 151.5 · moved 3 upmodel 140.5
model 140.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Cleveland St
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 53-101 | +21.5 | L −26.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 64-77 | +23.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 75-67 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 71-63 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 47-58 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | U 105 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 52-68 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 56-53 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | U 109 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 69-71 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 128.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 67-79 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 83-61 | +2.5 | W +24.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 92-75 | -0.5 | W +16.5 | 128.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 78-64 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 67-61 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 80-69 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 80-72 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 76-58 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 73-62 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 65-50 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 81-66 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 68-58 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 75-85 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 77-60 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 59-68 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 60-68 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-65 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 86-91 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 76-82 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 68-57 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 54-56 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 110 |
| Mar 24 | vs | W 88-73 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 25 | vs | W 72-65 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 68-79 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
MICH
L 53-101
−26.5
9
@
KSU
L 64-77
+10.5
12
@
VAL
W 75-67
+11.5
16
vs
EMU
W 71-63
+1.5
19
@
MINN
L 47-58
+2.5
23
vs
KENT
L 52-68
−13.5
26
vs
NJIT
W 56-53
−9.5
29
vs
MORE
L 69-71
−7.5
5
@
MILW
L 67-79
−4.5
7
@
GB
W 83-61
+24.5
19
vs
OAK
W 92-75
+16.5
29
vs
WRST
W 78-64
+12.5
4
vs
IUIN
W 67-61
−3.5
8
@
RMU
W 80-69
+13.5
11
@
YSU
W 80-72
+12.5
15
vs
NKU
W 76-58
+13.5
19
@
IUIN
W 73-62
+5.5
22
vs
DETM
W 65-50
+0.5
25
vs
GB
W 81-66
−0.5
30
@
PFW
W 68-58
+14.5
5
@
NKU
L 75-85
−8.5
8
vs
MILW
W 77-60
+15.5
12
vs
RMU
L 59-68
−13.5
16
vs
YSU
L 60-68
−11.5
21
@
DETM
W 73-65
−0.5
23
@
OAK
L 86-91
−2.5
27
@
WRST
L 76-82
−4.5
1
vs
PFW
W 68-57
+8.5
6
vs
NKU
W 68-63
+0.5
10
vs
YSU
L 54-56
−4.5
24
vs
QUC
W 88-73
+10.5
25
vs
FGCU
W 72-65
+1.5
26
vs
ILST
L 68-79
−9.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
MICH
L 53-101
+6.5
9
@
KSU
L 64-77
−7.5
12
@
VAL
W 75-67
−6.5
16
vs
EMU
W 71-63
−5.5
19
@
MINN
L 47-58
−23.5
23
vs
KENT
L 52-68
−15.5
26
vs
NJIT
W 56-53
−23.5
29
vs
MORE
L 69-71
+11.5
5
@
MILW
L 67-79
+5.5
7
@
GB
W 83-61
−3.5
19
vs
OAK
W 92-75
+38.5
29
vs
WRST
W 78-64
−2.5
4
vs
IUIN
W 67-61
−12.5
8
@
RMU
W 80-69
+10.5
11
@
YSU
W 80-72
+14.5
15
vs
NKU
W 76-58
+1.5
19
@
IUIN
W 73-62
−4.5
22
vs
DETM
W 65-50
−22.5
25
vs
GB
W 81-66
+6.5
30
@
PFW
W 68-58
−21.5
5
@
NKU
L 75-85
+27.5
8
vs
MILW
W 77-60
−5.5
12
vs
RMU
L 59-68
−13.5
16
vs
YSU
L 60-68
−13.5
21
@
DETM
W 73-65
−1.5
23
@
OAK
L 86-91
+38.5
27
@
WRST
L 76-82
+10.5
1
vs
PFW
W 68-57
−23.5
6
vs
NKU
W 68-63
−9.5
10
vs
YSU
L 54-56
−28.5
24
vs
QUC
W 88-73
+14.5
25
vs
FGCU
W 72-65
−1.5
26
vs
ILST
L 68-79
+9.5
over 13under 20avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Loyola Chicago
36 games played
Straight up
24-12
67% wins
Against the spread
19-17
53% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-17
53% overs · avg +0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 79-72 | -21.5 | L −14.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-65 | -24.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 73-68 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 76-72 | -14.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 89-53 | -9.5 | W +26.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 76-54 | -18.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-72 | -10.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 66-76 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 72-60 | -24.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 71-72 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 23 | vs | L 68-77 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 25 | vs | L 68-71 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 65-84 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 79-68 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 57-93 | +5.5 | L −30.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 81-77 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 81-83 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 70-66 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 53-58 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 58-55 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 77-53 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 56-69 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 131.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 87-80 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-69 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 77-69 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 76-72 | +0.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 77-57 | -4.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 67-98 | +2.5 | L −28.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 82-72 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 74-51 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 148.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 72-64 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 55-62 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Mar 19 | @ | W 73-70 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 23 | @ | W 77-76 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 26 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Apr 1 | vs | L 73-80 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
CHST
W 79-72
−14.5
7
vs
DETM
W 87-65
−2.5
15
@
PRIN
W 73-68
+6.5
19
vs
SUU
W 76-72
−10.5
23
vs
TLSA
W 89-53
+26.5
3
vs
EMU
W 76-54
+3.5
7
vs
USF
W 74-72
−8.5
15
vs
SF
L 66-76
−6.5
18
vs
CAN
W 72-60
−12.5
22
vs
OAK
L 71-72
−7.5
23
vs
COFC
L 68-77
−10.5
25
vs
MUR
L 68-71
−5.5
4
vs
VCU
L 65-84
−13.5
8
@
LAS
W 79-68
+9.5
11
@
JOES
L 57-93
−30.5
15
vs
URI
W 81-77
−0.5
18
@
DAY
L 81-83
+8.5
22
vs
FOR
W 70-66
−6.5
29
@
GMU
L 53-58
+1.5
1
vs
JOES
W 58-55
+4.5
4
vs
SBU
W 77-53
+20.5
8
@
DUQ
L 56-69
−14.5
11
@
RICH
W 87-80
+2.5
14
vs
SLU
W 78-69
+6.5
18
@
DAV
W 77-69
+10.5
21
vs
DAY
W 76-72
+4.5
26
vs
GW
W 77-57
+15.5
1
@
SLU
L 67-98
−28.5
5
vs
DAV
W 82-72
+4.5
8
@
MASS
W 74-51
+19.5
14
vs
SLU
W 72-64
+6.5
15
vs
VCU
L 55-62
+2.5
19
@
SJSU
W 73-70
−0.5
23
@
SF
W 77-76
+5.5
26
vs
KENT
W 72-62
+4.5
1
vs
UTC
L 73-80
−9.5
covered 19didn’t cover 17avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
CHST
W 79-72
+13.5
7
vs
DETM
W 87-65
+11.5
15
@
PRIN
W 73-68
−6.5
19
vs
SUU
W 76-72
+0.5
23
vs
TLSA
W 89-53
−6.5
3
vs
EMU
W 76-54
−14.5
7
vs
USF
W 74-72
−1.5
15
vs
SF
L 66-76
+5.5
18
vs
CAN
W 72-60
−7.5
22
vs
OAK
L 71-72
+9.5
23
vs
COFC
L 68-77
−2.5
25
vs
MUR
L 68-71
+1.5
4
vs
VCU
L 65-84
+9.5
8
@
LAS
W 79-68
−0.5
11
@
JOES
L 57-93
+7.5
15
vs
URI
W 81-77
+11.5
18
@
DAY
L 81-83
+22.5
22
vs
FOR
W 70-66
−12.5
29
@
GMU
L 53-58
−20.5
1
vs
JOES
W 58-55
−29.5
4
vs
SBU
W 77-53
−4.5
8
@
DUQ
L 56-69
−6.5
11
@
RICH
W 87-80
+37.5
14
vs
SLU
W 78-69
+6.5
18
@
DAV
W 77-69
+6.5
21
vs
DAY
W 76-72
+7.5
26
vs
GW
W 77-57
−5.5
1
@
SLU
L 67-98
+22.5
5
vs
DAV
W 82-72
+15.5
8
@
MASS
W 74-51
−23.5
14
vs
SLU
W 72-64
−5.5
15
vs
VCU
L 55-62
−19.5
19
@
SJSU
W 73-70
+0.5
23
@
SF
W 77-76
+7.5
26
vs
KENT
W 72-62
−8.5
1
vs
UTC
L 73-80
+6.5
over 19under 17avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Cleveland St
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
Loyola Chicago
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.