The Field House · at East Texas A&M · Conference game
Closing line
SFA -4.5✓ SFA covered by 22.5
SFA -4.5✓ SFA covered by 22.5Closing total146.5Under by 23.5
| SFA | This season | ETAM |
|---|---|---|
| 7-2 | Record | 4-6 |
| 7-2 | ATS | 7-3 |
| 3-6 | O/U | 6-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SFA 75–70 ETAM · ✓ SFA (67%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFA | 39 | 36 | 75 |
| ETAM | 30 | 18 | 48 |
1st half: SFA 39, ETAM 30 (SFA by 9). The model had SFA by 3.1 and a total of 67.7 (actual 69).
Team stats
| SFA | ETAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-63 41% | Field goals | 18-51 35% |
| 11-29 38% | 3-pointers | 8-22 36% |
| 12-17 71% | Free throws | 4-14 29% |
| 45 15 off | Rebounds | 31 7 off |
| 16 | Assists | 11 |
| 9 | Steals | 5 |
| 0 | Blocks | 5 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| 20 | Points in paint | 14 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 8 |
Players
| SFA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lateef Patrick Jr. G | 31 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 6-14 | 3-8 |
| Keon Thompson G | 28 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 6-12 | 1-2 |
| Chrishawn Christmas G | 28 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-0 |
| Jerald Colonel F | 24 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| Kam Burton G | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 2-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Narit Chotikavanic G | 22 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 4-8 | 4-8 |
| Gediminas Alisas F | 16 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Ahamed Mohammed G | 16 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-3 |
| Eltramon Smith F | 12 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3-4 | 1-2 |
| Marcus Scurry G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Christian Green, Bryceson Melvin, Harris Dar, Yohan Gutierrez, Tichyque Musaka
| ETAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronnie Harrison F | 30 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 4-12 | 1-5 |
| London Fields G | 24 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Damian Garcia G | 22 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 |
| Michael Folarin F | 21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| Gianni Hunt G | 16 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Vinny Sigona G | 26 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 4-11 | 3-8 |
| Noah Pagotto F | 22 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-2 |
| Evan Phelps G | 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Alex McCray G | 14 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Josh Taylor F | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Tay Mosher F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Kamren Robinson, Parker Whisenhunt, Chris Adlam, Mykol Sanchez-Vega, Kollin Tolbert
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSFA -6.5
2 → ETAM
CloseSFA -4.5
2 pts toward ETAM
Total
Open146.5
no move
Close146.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
SFA -225 · ETAM +185
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SFA -6.5 · closed SFA -4.5 · moved 2 toward ETAMmodel SFA -5
model SFA -5
Opened 146.5 · unchangedmodel 144.5
model 144.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | SFA -4.5 | SFA -5.0 | SFA +0.5 | W SFA covered |
| Total | 146.5 | 144.6 | Under 1.9 | W Under |
| Projected score | — | SFA 74.8 · ETAM 69.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SFA -3.1 | SFA -9.0 |
| 1H total | 67.7 | 69 |
| 1H projected score | SFA 35.4 · ETAM 32.3 | SFA 39 · ETAM 30 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFAlast 9 | 7-2 78% | 7-2 78% | 3-6 33% |
| ETAM | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SFA 2–0 ETAMSFA leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · SFA has won the last 2 meetings · SFA 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2024-25 | SFA 76 @ ETAM 74 | ETAM +6.5 | ETAM W |
| Jan 27, 2024-25 | ETAM 72 @ SFA 79 | SFA -9.5 | ETAM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SF Austin
9 games played
Straight up
7-2
78% wins
Against the spread
7-2
78% covers · avg +5.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-6
33% overs · avg −1.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs ARST | W 90-65 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ RICE | W 81-69 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs ACU | W 76-66 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 18 | @ FRES | L 78-80 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | @ PEPP | W 63-60 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 29 | @ UTA | L 61-66 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 3 | vs RGV | W 73-60 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 7 | vs ULM | W 96-76 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 17 | vs AMCC | W 69-60 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vsARST
ARSTW 90-65
+26.5
11
@RICE
RICEW 81-69
+14.5
14
vsACU
ACUW 76-66
+3.5
18
@FRES
FRESL 78-80
−4.5
21
@PEPP
PEPPW 63-60
+1.5
29
@UTA
UTAL 61-66
−3.5
3
vsRGV
RGVW 73-60
+6.5
7
vsULM
ULMW 96-76
+0.5
17
vsAMCC
AMCCW 69-60
+2.5
covered 7didn’t cover 2avg +5.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vsARST
ARSTW 90-65
−0.5
11
@RICE
RICEW 81-69
+0.5
14
vsACU
ACUW 76-66
−0.5
18
@FRES
FRESL 78-80
+11.5
21
@PEPP
PEPPW 63-60
−25.5
29
@UTA
UTAL 61-66
−11.5
3
vsRGV
RGVW 73-60
−10.5
7
vsULM
ULMW 96-76
+29.5
17
vsAMCC
AMCCW 69-60
−10.5
over 3under 6avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
East Texas A&M
10 games played
Straight up
4-6
40% wins
Against the spread
7-3
70% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
6-4
60% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ UNM | L 54-76 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ HAW | L 74-100 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 14 | @RICE | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | @ FDU | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs ARMY | W 84-67 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 5 | @ CONN | L 59-83 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs CARK | W 75-68 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 12 | @ MCN | L 66-102 | +20.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 15 | @ SELA | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ TA&M | L 77-118 | +28.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@UNM
UNML 54-76
+0.5
10
@HAW
HAWL 74-100
−7.5
14
@RICE
RICEL 64-71
+3.5
24
@FDU
FDUW 70-65
+1.5
25
vsARMY
ARMYW 84-67
+14.5
5
@CONN
CONNL 59-83
+12.5
7
vsCARK
CARKW 75-68
+4.5
12
@MCN
MCNL 66-102
−15.5
15
@SELA
SELAW 70-69
+5.5
21
@TA&M
TA&ML 77-118
−12.5
covered 7didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@UNM
UNML 54-76
−13.5
10
@HAW
HAWL 74-100
+28.5
14
@RICE
RICEL 64-71
−11.5
24
@FDU
FDUW 70-65
−14.5
25
vsARMY
ARMYW 84-67
+7.5
5
@CONN
CONNL 59-83
+0.5
7
vsCARK
CARKW 75-68
−2.5
12
@MCN
MCNL 66-102
+25.5
15
@SELA
SELAW 70-69
+1.5
21
@TA&M
TA&ML 77-118
+28.5
over 6under 4avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SF Austin
7-2 overall · 2-0 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Texas A&M-CC69–60
- Wvs UL Monroe96–76
- Wvs UT Rio Grande73–60
- L@ UT Arlington61–66
- W@ Pepperdine63–60
A week or more of rest.
East Texas A&M
4-6 overall · 1-1 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Texas A&M77–118
- W@ SE Louisiana70–69
- L@ McNeese66–102
- Wvs C Arkansas75–68
- L@ UConn59–83
A week or more of rest.